Home U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • Options
    If the coin is actually an 1880-O...yes...but I think his description pretty much leads you to believe he doesn't always include the actual picture of the coin....so I would say the going rate for an 1888-O in MS64 is around $50

    1888-0 PCGS MS64
  • Options
    DD Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭
    Text

    -Daniel
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."

    -Aristotle

    Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.

    -Horace
  • Options
    Not my area but looks like a good deal.

    courtesy link

    Ralph
    image
  • Options
    what if the coin in the picture is the one i Rec'd......
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow! Then you paid $43 for a $1300 coin.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options


    << <i>the coin in the picture is the one i Rec'd...... >>



    Then yes.....rip central imageimageimageimageimage
  • Options
    GATGAT Posts: 3,146
    There is no coin Santa Claus and no way will he sent you a MS64 1880-O. Anyone that believes that is day dreaming.
    USAF vet 1951-59
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    I would notify the seller - you'll hopefully feel and sleep better that way, even without the windfall.
  • Options
    what if i said the coin I was sent is the exact same coin pictured in the auction.....
  • Options
    TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,099 ✭✭✭
    1888-O

    Bid: 36
    Ask: 40

    TorinoCobra71

    image
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>There is no coin Santa Claus and no way will he sent you a MS64 1880-O. >>





    << <i>the coin in the picture is the one i Rec'd...... >>



    Russ, NCNE

  • Options
    GATGAT Posts: 3,146
    Russ, you know as well and I that sellers get their photo urls mixed up all the time on the bay.
    USAF vet 1951-59
  • Options
    Wolf359Wolf359 Posts: 7,666 ✭✭✭
    Will, no one believes you. Post a new photo of the coin you received and make us liars.
  • Options
    The question i am hoping to have answered is that if the coin Rec'd was the EXACT coin in the picture.....what would you do?
  • Options
    ddbirdddbird Posts: 3,168 ✭✭✭
    Notify the seller...worst case he takes the coin back, you feel better, and he may slip ya something nice for free. Least thats what I would do.
    It was his mistake and he should compensate for it, but not 2k.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Russ, you know as well and I that sellers get their photo urls mixed up all the time on the bay. >>



    GAT,

    He already stated he received the 1880-O pictured in the auction.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    morgannut2morgannut2 Posts: 4,293
    I'm confused what was the cost and what was recieved? The 88-O is a $40 coin, I paid a bit over a grand for a high end 80-O even in NGC 64. There is no Santa but what gives?
    morgannut2
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm confused what was the cost and what was recieved? The 88-O is a $40 coin, I paid a bit over a grand for a high end 80-O even in NGC 64. There is no Santa but what gives? >>

    The listing title said PCGS MS64 1888-O and the coin brought $43.

    But, the image contained within the listing was of a PCGS MS64 1880-O and the coin received by the buyer was an 1880-O which matched the image. Therefore the buyer received a coin worth in excess of $1000, for which he had paid $43.

    I wonder if someone else won and paid for an 1880-O and is going to receive or has received an 1888-O?
  • Options
    morgannut2morgannut2 Posts: 4,293
    The buyer has no ethical obligation to inform the seller on Ebay, of what his opinion of value might be. Why? The price was set by the marketplace-auction. However, I would feel on ethical obligation to myself to Email the seller and make certain that the actual 1880-O recieved was in fact the coin that the seller intended to auction. If there was a case of confusion or error, I'd offer to return the item. However I'd wouldn't have bid on an 88-O to begin with, without first finding out if that was what I'd get. Frankly it seems more like a bait-and-switch auction, temping greedy bidders to pay a little extra on the lottery chance of buying an 80-O for peanuts. But you never know these days----image
    morgannut2
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i> Frankly it seems more like a bait-and-switch auction, temping greedy bidders to pay a little extra on the lottery chance of buying an 80-O for peanuts. But you never know these days >>

    I would agree but for the fact that in this case, the buyer says he actually RECEIVED the 1880-O ($1000 plus coin) pictured.
  • Options
    morgannut2morgannut2 Posts: 4,293
    Thanks for clarification Coinguy1--I'd feel obligated to confirm via email the 1880-O with serial # XYZ PCGS was the item sold and recieved, and was the one transacted for by my auction bid of $43 on that auction number. You might want to punch in the # at PCGS to affirm that it isn't stolen from a registry member as well.
    morgannut2

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file