Options
...
TerrapinWill
Posts: 848
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3976977203&rd=1&sspagename=STRK:MEWN:IT&rd=1
Sorry, I am not good making links....
Sorry, I am not good making links....
0
Comments
1888-0 PCGS MS64
-Daniel
-Aristotle
Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
-Horace
courtesy link
Ralph
<< <i>the coin in the picture is the one i Rec'd...... >>
Then yes.....rip central
Bid: 36
Ask: 40
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>There is no coin Santa Claus and no way will he sent you a MS64 1880-O. >>
<< <i>the coin in the picture is the one i Rec'd...... >>
Russ, NCNE
Free Trial
It was his mistake and he should compensate for it, but not 2k.
">"http://www.cashcrate.com/5663377"
<< <i>Russ, you know as well and I that sellers get their photo urls mixed up all the time on the bay. >>
GAT,
He already stated he received the 1880-O pictured in the auction.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>I'm confused what was the cost and what was recieved? The 88-O is a $40 coin, I paid a bit over a grand for a high end 80-O even in NGC 64. There is no Santa but what gives? >>
The listing title said PCGS MS64 1888-O and the coin brought $43.
But, the image contained within the listing was of a PCGS MS64 1880-O and the coin received by the buyer was an 1880-O which matched the image. Therefore the buyer received a coin worth in excess of $1000, for which he had paid $43.
I wonder if someone else won and paid for an 1880-O and is going to receive or has received an 1888-O?
<< <i> Frankly it seems more like a bait-and-switch auction, temping greedy bidders to pay a little extra on the lottery chance of buying an 80-O for peanuts. But you never know these days >>
I would agree but for the fact that in this case, the buyer says he actually RECEIVED the 1880-O ($1000 plus coin) pictured.