How many coins have you purchased slabbed, only to have them "turn" in the holder later?
Part of my collecting interest is in cameo proof franklins. I have around 30 or so slabbed cameo franklins right now, and about 4 of them in newer pcgs holders have subsequently (6-12 months later) developed really unattractive milkspots. I haven't had this happen with any other holder, so my guess is that a lot of folks have been making the franklins "blast white" right before sending them in for grading. How many coins and what types have you bought slabbed that later turned somehow- spots, haze, splotchiness, etc.?
My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
0
Comments
FrederickCoinClub
A PCGS red large cent WAS turning.
Don't like red copper. Shellac is all I'd trust on them.
Russ, NCNE
As for coins that I bought in the holder, probably four or five, all of them sliver.
Dippy-ee-de-du-da! That's why we have these problems.
<< <i>Dippy-ee-de-du-da! That's why we have these problems. >>
The vast majority of milk spots that emerge on 1950 to 1964 proof coins are because they weren't dipped to stabilize the surfaces and remove contaminants that can later materialize as milk spots. NONE that I've dipped have ever developed spots. Too many that I didn't dip did develop spots.
Brown or gold spotting is another matter - that usually indicates an improperly neutralized dip attempt.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Brown or gold spotting is another matter - that usually indicates an improperly neutralized dip attempt. >>
Yep, that's Dippy-ee-de-du-da! , and all of us have been caught by it one time or another.
BTY - Gold toning sells; with brown toning you get the shaft.
<< <i>Since I started dipping every proof prior to submission, it has never happened again.
>>
So you're the Big Dipper??
Doesn't dipping ruin a proof surface on modern stuff?
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>I see the clueless quotient in this thread has just multiplied exponentially.
Russ, NCNE >>
I see the clueless quotient in this thread has just multiplied exponentially.
OK- maybe now this thread will get a little more interesting......
<< <i>How many coins have you purchased slabbed, only to have them "turn" in the holder later? >>
Only one or two over the years. Proofs, as I recall.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
I was wondering about cases like that where a fingerprint reincarnates itself on your coin. I would guess that would be a case of a coin being dipped, then slabbed- but the dip didn't remove the fundamental imprint on the coin, and the print returns later?
<< <i>One that started to develop the "dreaded fingerprint" after I had it for awhile!!
I was wondering about cases like that where a fingerprint reincarnates itself on your coin. I would guess that would be a case of a coin being dipped, then slabbed- but the dip didn't remove the fundamental imprint on the coin, and the print returns later?
More likely it was dipped and then fingerprinted afterwards. In the past there was a problem with coins coming back from PCGS with fingerprints that weren't there when the coins were submitted. Numerous threads were generated on this board complaining about this problem. I haven't seen any for a while so they must have fixed the problem.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire