Home U.S. Coin Forum

Matte Proof and Brilliant Proof Buffalo Nickels

BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
One of the members asked to me post pictures a Matte Proof and a Brilliant Proof Buffalo nickel. Here they are.

Matte Proof:

imageimage

Brilliant Proof:

imageimage

The first 1936 Proof nickels had a satin finish, which was brighter than the Matte Proof finish, but not nearly as bright as the brilliant finish. Collectors complained about satin Proof coins, which prompted the mint to polish the dies far more than it had in years. The resulting coins are almost so bright that one can almost not see the design. Everything on these coins was highly polished. including the devices. As a result very few Proof coins from the 1936 - 42 era show an cameo contrast. I've never seen a Proof Buffalo nickel with even a hint of cameo contrast.

The differences between a brilliant Proof Buffalo and even the brightest of business strike coins are significant. In addiiton to far sharper design details, the Proof coins have a very bright mirror surface. No business strike coin, unless it has been severely polished, can compare to it.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Comments

  • DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,042 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Got a comparative picture of the satin as well?
    Doug


  • Great post Bill, thanks!

    looks like I have a 36 p Buff w/ pretty heavy die polishing that gave the coin a PL look to it.

    Manuel
    Monday April 10, 2006 9:04 AM

    SM1 calls me a troublemaker....image

    --------------------------------------------
    Sunday August 19, 2007 9:17AM

    A mentor awarded " YOU SUCK!!"
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Below are pics of a 1936 Satin Proof. These coins do not possess the brilliant/mirror-like finish of the brilliant 1936 pieces, but they do display noticeably better strike detail and different luster than the business strikes:

    image

    image
  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    I need that 1913 T1 matte proof. Yes, I do. image

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I love the detail on proof buffalos. The matte proof are cooler, esp. the early ones with the textured fields.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • Neat coins!

    I had the pleasure of holding one of the PR 67 Cameos. It looked great, but not as cameo as a Jefferson.
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    Interesting to see -thanks!
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for providing the picture of the 1936 satin Proof, Mark. I didn't have one that I could post. image
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • MonstavetMonstavet Posts: 1,235 ✭✭
    Neat giveaway!!!! I'm in!
    Send Email or PM for free veterinary advice.
  • This one seemed difficult to photograph, but here is another 1936 Satin Proof.

    image

    Ken

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file