Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Your opinion of the strike on this Albany half...

dan1ecudan1ecu Posts: 1,573
in U.S. Coin Forum
This coin is described as having an "improvable strike."

Albany PCGS MS67

I've looked at several examples, and I've seen more detail on the beaver. The leaves are also weakly struck on the above example, aren't they? Additionally, looking at the reverse, there's some detail missing on the coats and on the eagle.

What do you think of the above coin, and of Albany halves in general when it comes to strike? What would you look for in an Albany?

Thanks,

Dan
Dan McInnes

mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu

Comments

  • poorguypoorguy Posts: 4,317 ✭
    I don't think the image is as representative of the coin as it should be. I can see why one would assume the strike is not all that strong and I can also see that the coin is very very clean as to be expected from an MS67. I like the tab toning though. I suppose you would just have to see it in person to know for sure. Doing alot of work with lighting angles, I can see how it could be misrepresented but there's always the possibility that it is really softly struck.
    Brandon Kelley - ANA - 972.746.9193 - http://www.bestofyesterdaycollectibles.com
  • XpipedreamRXpipedreamR Posts: 8,059 ✭✭


    << <i>This coin is described as having an "improvable strike."



    Dan >>







    You mean UNimprovable, correct? That's what the auction says.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...