Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

population diarrhea -- defined

lavalava Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭
Population diarrhea is the product of modern coins getting submitted to Third-Party Graders.

I understand that an ms69 or ms70 coin is conditionally rare, but there are many bags, mint sets, proof sets, etc., containing modern coins that may contain many 69s and 70s -- it is just a matter of time before someone submits them. As a result, the population numbers for moderns are like a house of cards. It is ironic that what is conditionally rare today is likely to be proven, over time, not to be so rare after all.



I brake for ear bars.

Comments

  • Options
    SandhawkSandhawk Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭


    image



    image


    imageimage

  • Options
    islemanguislemangu Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭
    does anyone really pay attention to pops of modern coins because of these conditions? pops are more fun with something like morgans in the 1000 pop under rangeimage

    The declaration argued that governments exist by and for the people with citizens obligated to overthrow a tyrannical government.

  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
  • Options
    BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    I don't understand how anyone can pay attention to any of the pop numbers. With all the crackouts and bouncing around between services, the numbers can't come close to reality.
  • Options
    BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
    I didn't know diarrhea was spelled that way, but I am afraid to look it upimage-------------BigE
    I'm glad I am a Tree
  • Options
    lavalava Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭
    Russ, it may not be what you want to hear, but look at these results from your pal's grades of yesterday:

    1 21742767 1969-S 1C USA PR68DC Sooo close
    1 21742768 1969-S 1C USA PR68DC Sooo close
    1 21742769 1969-S 1C USA PR68CA Oops
    2 21742770 1971-S 1C USA PR64DC What the hell was I thinking!
    2 21742771 1971-S 1C USA PR68DC Not Bad!
    2 21742772 1971-S 1C USA PR64CA Damn!
    3 21742775 1971-S 50C USA PR64 Hmmm Damn again!
    3 21742773 1971-S 50C USA PR69DC CHA-CHING! This is the 1st one of these I have ever made!!
    3 21742774 1971-S 50C USA PR69CA Close
    4 21742776 1967 5C SMS USA MS66DC Nice
    4 21742777 1967 5C SMS USA MS67DC CHA-CHING!
    5 21742778 1967 10C SMS USA MS68 OK

    It seems like PCGS is spitting out these PR68DC grades on a daily basis. If you quote population data in a 10-day ebay auction you may be liable for misrepresentation by the time the auction ends -- that seems to be how fast these pop numbers change.
    I brake for ear bars.
  • Options
    islemanguislemangu Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭
    can pay attention to any of the pop numbers. With all the crackouts and bouncing around between services, the numbers can't come close to reality.

    If under a 1000 pop, I think I can get close enough to realityimage

    The declaration argued that governments exist by and for the people with citizens obligated to overthrow a tyrannical government.

  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 29,967 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Population diarrhea is the product of modern coins getting submitted to Third-Party Graders.

    I understand that an ms69 or ms70 coin is conditionally rare, but there are many bags, mint sets, proof sets, etc., containing modern coins that may contain many 69s and 70s -- it is just a matter of time before someone submits them. As a result, the population numbers for moderns are like a house of cards. It is ironic that what is conditionally rare today is likely to be proven, over time, not to be so rare after all. >>



    There are no MS-69 or 70's in proof sets.

    There are no MS-70's in mint sets most likely considering that none have been graded.

    In fact if you define modern as '65 to '98 there are no MS-69's in mint sets either I believe.

    Most modern regular issues were not made at all in very high grade. It simply doesn't mat-
    ter that no one saved the coins because they were not produced in ultra high grades. Those
    who neglected to save any of these coins can always fall back on the argument that there are
    many of them in mint sets but the fact is that most of the mint sets have already been destroyed
    and their contents left to the ravages of circulation. Many which haven't been destroyed have
    been checked for high grades and found wanting.

    Really collectors of the future will be far less concerned with the paucity of the high grade coins
    available as they will with the few choice and attractive coins available. Incredibly these coins
    ae actually intended for commerce and that's exactly what happened to almost all of them. They
    are out there greasing the wheels of commerce and are wearing thin in the process. That most
    didn't see any reason to collect crappy clads is the reason that nice coins are often very difficult
    to find. It's also the reason that so many today believe that these coins do exist in very high
    grade.

    As far as many bags to check. This, too, is simply false. You won't even find an original roll of
    a coin like a 1969 quarter, much less a bag. In fact if you look at the first one hundred Washing-
    ton quarter sets that walk into a coin shop there won't be more than a couple '69's in them.
    It's not only '69's that are tough, it's virtually every single date of the obsolete eagle reverse
    clads. You'll see plenty of the bicentennials and a smattering of '65's and '66's. There might be
    a '96 to '98 roll on rare occasion, but others are virtully impossible. The proof of this is right there
    for anyone to see. But people are not looking at the coins or anything else related to these ac-
    tual coins. The proof is the price of the '82 and '83 issues. Everyone knew there were no mint
    sets so they set aside extra coins of these dates. The price of the '83 25C roll is over $1,000 !!!

    If so few of these were saved then how many of the other dates were saved? Remember that
    there isn't much demand for any of these clads and one of the more common ones goes for
    $1,000 per roll. Eventually the amount of demand for intact sets will exceed the supply that
    comes on the market from estate sales and the like. When this occurs there will be a major
    change in the perception of the availability of the coins. There will be an even greater change
    when the supply of most of the moderns is simply ended. It is the sets yielding the vast majority
    of the moon money moderns. Even if there were bags the quality is so poor that the chances
    of finding gems in them are remote.

    Right now there are only several thousand people assembling nice attractive sets of most of
    these coins. I'm wagering this is just about the limit before the supply constraints start show-
    ing up. In fact for some dates there are likely already too many collectors and it's not yet rec-
    ognized. Even if I'm wrong about the timing (and I have been longer than anyone else), it is
    a probability that the day is coming even if not at hand.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options
    How many grading services Pop counts realy count. I only consider the big three as reality.
    too many 3rd world graders give regular unleaded coins premium unleaded grades!!!
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It seems like PCGS is spitting out these PR68DC grades on a daily basis. >>



    So? Most PR68DCAMs aren't even worth the submission fee.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    lavalava Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭
    Cladking, that was a very informative and persuasive post, and maybe the most subtle post I have ever seen in which my post is seemingly criticized as being short-sighted. You just might have something. An `83 roll of quarters goes for $1,000? Glad there wasn't a wager on that; I would have been off by 100x.
    I brake for ear bars.
  • Options
    islemanguislemangu Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭
    How many grading services Pop counts realy count. I only consider the big three as reality.

    You may not have a choice
    I remember reading here about the 2nd tier TPGs don't release pop numbers??

    The declaration argued that governments exist by and for the people with citizens obligated to overthrow a tyrannical government.

  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 29,967 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Cladking, that was a very informative and persuasive post, and maybe the most subtle post I have ever seen in which my post is seemingly criticized as being short-sighted. You just might have something. An `83 roll of quarters goes for $1,000? Glad there wasn't a wager on that; I would have been off by 100x. >>



    Thank you. I sometimes find the subtlety difficult to maintain. image
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options


    << <i>There are no MS-69 or 70's in proof sets.

    There are no MS-70's in mint sets most likely considering that none have been graded. >>



    Out of curiosity, then, where do these high grade coins come from? I guess the new high grade Statehood Quarters are coming out of mint set, or are they?
    David
  • Options
    The change in Modern pop's really has made me think of the Moderns I collect more as "hobby coins": ones I own just because they're neat. On my Morgans, especially PL's and DMPL's, you are ALMOST always going to be dealing with relatively smaller more stable pop's. The one concern I have is for the GSA releases. Some are potentially more diarrhea-like than Moderns!!!! For example, there were precisely 962,638 Mint State 1884-CC dollars released by the Gov't, but to date PCGS has only graded 25,849 of them! I don't have the NGC numbers, but if it's double that ( larger because they grade in the GSA holder) that means only around 75,000 of the 962,638 have been graded. That's around 880,000 to go! Everyone of them Mint State and protected by a plastic holder from abuse. You have to be a bit careful on any series be it CC Morgans or rare 19th Century gold that might show up in shipwreaks.
    morgannut2
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 29,967 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>There are no MS-69 or 70's in proof sets.

    There are no MS-70's in mint sets most likely considering that none have been graded. >>



    Out of curiosity, then, where do these high grade coins come from? I guess the new high grade Statehood Quarters are coming out of mint set, or are they? >>



    The ultra moderns are coming nicer due to improvements made at the mint. Most
    of these are still coming from the mint sets. Still, no regular issue modern or ultra-
    modern has been graded MS-70. I believe all the MS-69's are ultra-moderns.

    There are some very high grade Lincolns in the mint sets made since 1986 and it is
    entirely possible that some might grade 69 or 70. It would probably bring moon
    money if it did. There is no real chance that many of the moderns will ever grade
    MS-68 unless they are "graded on the curve". Some of these are quite difficult to
    find even in nice attractive MS-63. The distribution of grades is even more erratic
    than the pop reports list because people send in only the finest coins and some of
    these are not much easier to find even a few grades down.

    Prices are largely determined by demand which is still quite low. But it doesn't pay
    slab coins worth only a few dollars so pops are determined by demand also.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options


    << <i>I didn't know diarrhea was spelled that way, but I am afraid to look it upimage-------------BigE >>



    http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=diarrhea
    image
    Please check out my eBay auctions!
    My WLH Short Set Registry Collection

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file