Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

A treat for you 1960's era DCAM proof Jefferson fans.

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
Got this one in a couple days ago:

image

Besides being a nice DCAM, it's unusual in that it doesn't have any spotting or hazing. Most of these I've seen in the proof sets do. This one likely grades PR68 because of a couple ticks in the fields as well as Jefferson's lower jaw. But, I'm still learning these, so I could be full of crap.

Russ, NCNE

Comments

  • Options
    JamericonJamericon Posts: 445 ✭✭✭
    Excellent coin. The cameo contrast is beautiful! I agree with you abotu the nicks on the chin.
    Jamie Yakes - U.S. paper money collector, researcher, and author. | Join the SPMCUS Small-Size Notes, National Bank Notes, and NJ Depression Scrip
  • Options
    Hey Russ, did you win the auction for Martys SMS nickel??
    image
    image
  • Options
    HootHoot Posts: 867
    Tremendous coin. The proofs of the 1960s and early 70s were works of art IMO. Very nice piece.

    Hoot
    From this hour I ordain myself loos'd of limits and imaginary lines. - Whitman
  • Options
    Here's what a 66 cam looks like:
    image
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Hey Russ, did you win the auction for Martys SMS nickel?? >>



    No, it went for way more than I can afford. Marty always has those good ones and I'm stuck with nothing.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    seanqseanq Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What a coinkydink - here are two I picked up in New Hampshire this weekend:

    The cameo is a little light on the obverse of this one:

    image

    ... but it will make a nice set-up coin for this next one:

    image

    That obverse pic is through a flip, as my first attepmt was out of focus. You can see the degree of frost and mirrors much better in the blurry pic, though:

    image

    The first coin came in an $7.50 set, the second one I picked up for the princely sum of $1.50. image


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Options
    Hey Russ,

    That 69 would fit just fine in my raw Jeff. proof set. If you decide to part with it, give me a shout.

    Thanks
    gary
    Gary
    image
  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,987 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Russ's 1969 Jeffy looks very nice. I have been lucky enough to find a couple of raw 1969's in proof sets that look similar. Putting together a 1969 proof set with all 5 coins that look like Russ's 1969 is tough, time consuming, yet doable without breaking the bank. Once completed, it is mighty fine to look at. The same goes for 1968 and 1970 sets. It has been my experience that the minors for these years are much more difficult to find than are the halves. Anyone have a similar experience?
  • Options
    Nice Jeff! The dies wear so quickly at the jaw it is hard to find them perfect there. Those nicks might be die wear rather than actual hits so they might not hurt the grade much.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That 69 would fit just fine in my raw Jeff. proof set. If you decide to part with it, give me a shout. >>



    That one will go in on a submission as a learning coin.



    << <i>It has been my experience that the minors for these years are much more difficult to find than are the halves. Anyone have a similar experience? >>



    In top grade deep cameo, absolutely. Since the half was the only coin with silver content, it didn't wear down the dies as fast as the harder cupro nickel coins. The Lincolns have their own set of problems - carbon spots.

    Russ, NCNE

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file