Options
Type Set Question -- Poll
FrattLaw
Posts: 3,290 ✭✭
My Wayte Raymond Type Set has 1 space for Kennedy Halves. And I'm trying to decide what year/mintmark to use. At first I decided on a silver 1976 bicentennial issue. Then I thought about the 1965, SMS. And finally I saw a matte proof 1998 and thought that would be unique.
So I'd figure I'd put it out to a vote.
Thanks
Michael
So I'd figure I'd put it out to a vote.
Thanks
Michael
0
Comments
My type set album had space for THREE kennedies actually (silver, clad, and bicentenial) So i used one of russ', a proof from my birthyear, and a silver proof bicentenial.
Bytheway - happy belated birthday
Exactly what I was thinking.
Joe.
That's what I voted but don't tell Russ!
For me it's the only one i'll probably never have.
If there are several holes for the Kennedy then i would agree with those who chose the '64 AH as one of the picks to go along with the '98 MP.
Good Luck on whatever you decide.
a cameo '64, AH or not, would also be nice.
I would not choose a clad coin, myself.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
W.C. Fields
I voted for the 1976 Silver Bicentennial Unc. This is the most major design change. I'd have a 1964, 1976, and the 1998 Matte Proof in mine.
Actually to maintain a type set, you need the following:
1964 90% silver
1965 -'70 40% silver
1971 - date clad heraldic eagle
1776 - 1976 Bicentennial
I would not see any reason at all to include the 1998 Matte Proof in a type set. That's a difference in finish, not design.
If you really became super detailed type collector you could go for all of the hub changes that have been made to the JFK half dollars through the years. In addtion to the first hub change which was the accented hair and the non-accented hair there have been many minor adjustments that have been made. They include the hair style and the width of the rim.
BUT if you do that, remember that a lot of other type coins have had minor changes made to them through the years too. AND including them, especially the early coins, can get really expensive. For example you could collect four Pole to Cap large cents, the heads of 1793, '94, '95 and '96.
<< <i>1964 90% silver
1965 -'70 40% silver
1971 - date clad heraldic eagle
1776 - 1976 Bicentennial >>
Wouldn't you need two bicentennials: a silver and a clad?
Personally, I don't include the Bicentennials in my type set. I have them in a separate set of "circulating commemoratives" which include those, the SQs, and the new nickels. I have three JFK halves for type: 90% silver, 40% silver, and CuNi clad.
But if you've only got one slot, I voted for the 1998 Matte, cause it's so beautiful....
<< <i>I'd go with a nice uncirculated 1964-D. >>
Me too !!
Thanks everyone,
Michael