Options
Dec 8th CW front page article...
Mint seeks artistic infusion.
The sixth paragraph starts:
"Whether the selected artists will have their initials appear on coins or medals they design, but that later are modeled by Mint engravers, ..."
It should read:
Whether the selected artists will have their original designs totally changed on coins or medals they design, but are later modeled and credit taken by Mint engravers, ...
Makes one wonder how the great painters like Picaso, etc., would have felt having their work do by others and then signing off as if they did it.
The sixth paragraph starts:
"Whether the selected artists will have their initials appear on coins or medals they design, but that later are modeled by Mint engravers, ..."
It should read:
Whether the selected artists will have their original designs totally changed on coins or medals they design, but are later modeled and credit taken by Mint engravers, ...
Makes one wonder how the great painters like Picaso, etc., would have felt having their work do by others and then signing off as if they did it.
Dan
0
Comments
<< <i>Whether the selected artists will have their original designs totally changed on coins or medals they design, but are later modeled and credit taken by Mint engravers, ... >>
Would be
If not so true and
09/07/2006
They're just saying what you said it SHOULD say the politically correct way.
The mint also says, ON THEIR WEBSITE, and I quote, Artists selected to participate in the program will be paid honoraria for their work, and those whose designs are used for certain coins and medals will be named as the designer in historical documents, including certificates of authenticity and promotional materials.
So...their name will end up somewhere but not their initials on the coin/medal. Why should the engraver get credit? He/she is copying the original, right?
I bet Morgan would have been happy to have someone elses initials on his dollars.....
I just returned from doing a little shopping. Perhaps it was stress related.