Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

A Commemerative question..........

keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
Oftentimes a seemingly lovely coin is listed for sale in a raw state and it's met with opinions which ask why it's still raw if it's so nice or state that it probably was submitted and rejected at least once by a major grading service, rejected and now is being offered raw. Logical assumptions, especially when the seller regularly auctions coins with rainbow toning and high grades. Given these facts, what do you think of this coin with regard to the color and the fact that it's still raw?

I have no reason to suspect that it is/isn't what it's purported to be, album toned. What does cause me to be cautious is the almost totally red obverse which lies mainly in the fields and the apparent lack of luster. Who'll dare to comment on this coin??

Al H.image

Comments

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,810 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It doesn't look like album toning to me, but it does look completely original.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,756 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Al, nice looking Oregon.

    I am not so sure I agree with the mindset that anything worth having would be in a slab, and, therefore, if it's not in a slab, there is a "reason" it's still raw.

    I think that there are a lot of coins out there that are in the hands of people that don't want slabbed coins, there are probably even some people that don't trust the certified grading companies.

    I think this is where the insights from this board can be valuable if not taken as always "gospel".

    There are many good brains here that can highlight why a particular coin may be suspect, those are good opinions to listen to. However, for anyone to state without a doubt, that a raw coin has an evil past, is simply unbelieveable.

    I like that commem, I'd be proud to have it in my collection, but then I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, so, get some other opnions.
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 36,004 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin looks "original" to me, but I don't find it overly attractive. It was probably soap and watered years ago in put into an envelope, probably moist. The parts that touched the paper did not tone; the parts that were away from the paper did tone. I've never cared much for these pieces with deep toning coupled with white sections.

    At any rate slabbing this piece is marginal. It's only worth $120 wholesale. Usually a coin should be worth at least a couple hundred to make slabbing it worthwhile.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
  • Options
    LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
    Oh No... its that Stevens cat again......

    Stevens.... where's Lucilles Winged Liberty?
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • Options
    I think it's important to note that we all know who this seller is, AND that he has no negatives or neutrals within the last six months. To have nearly 600 feedbacks with 6 negatives, more than half a year ago, isn't too shabby!
  • Options
    MacCoinMacCoin Posts: 2,544 ✭✭
    heck is a Commemerative! I would not waste my money having it graded. to me the are some coins you just don't submit and Commemeratives are some of them proof state quarters are another.
    image


    I hate it when you see my post before I can edit the spelling.

    Always looking for nice type coins

    my local dealer
  • Options
    EvilMCTEvilMCT Posts: 799 ✭✭✭
    If this were from some other, unknown seller, I would pass on it. The colors do not look right to me, but I am no expert. I avoid buying toned coins that aren't in hand. Knowing who the seller is would persuade me to think about it, but I would still pass. I do not have a problem with the coin being raw, I have a problem with not being a commemorative collector.

    Ken
    my knuckles, they bleed, on your front door
  • Options
    The coin is a 1926-S Oregon, which can be found with autumn colors or purples and blues, much more frequently than other Oregon issues (especially the 1926-P). This looks like original color to me, and the luster (satiny) is also typical of the issue. Here's another 1926-S that displays a similar palate of colors, albeit more wild and vibrant. It is certified NGC MS67:

    image
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Coinguy must agree with that "commemguy" guy in this instance, even if we do work together.image
  • Options
    LAWMANLAWMAN Posts: 1,274 ✭✭
    I was about to say the obverse looks like a blowtorch job until I saw Commemguy's coin with both sides looking like that. Hmmm.

    There ought to be a bodybagged registry to be able to see exactly what % of raw coins are raw because of BB'ing as opposed to somebody never getting around to getting it slabbed.
    DSW
  • Options
    keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    despite some of the reassuring comments, that link by Claus seems to be the most telling. six weeks and the coin offered raw begs me to pass. thanks for the input everyone.

    al h.image
  • Options
    relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570 ✭


    << <i>Coinguy must agree with that "commemguy" guy in this instance, even if we do work together. >>



    Tell us how you taught a monkey to grade coins. image Pretty impressive image

    BTW - I'll stick with my comments on the old post thread (Nice, but I'd pass)
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file