Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Newbie

Greetings nuimismatists. My name is Rob and I am new to serious collecting of coins. I have collected US coins on an off for years, but nothing serious until lately. Not sure why, just been facinated with coins and getting more so as I get older. Perhaps it was the state quarters that re-sparked my interest, my favorite is the connecticut. I will be shopping for a high grade proof of that one for my collection.

Anyway, I am posting here to say hello and also to ask a few questions. Actually I have many questions but I know most will be answered in time. I purchased the PCGS guide to coin grading and I have a few other books and magazines about collecting coins. I will dutifully read these publications to learn as much as I can.

Before my first question, please feel free to flame me if I am not supposed to post newbie type questions here and I will look elsewhere for a place to ask questions. I did go and look at all the PCGS forums and this one seemed like a logical place to post. I saw a forum for Q and A but it said Q&A to PCGS, I certainly dont want to ask questions to experts there. If my postings bother anyone or if you know of a more appropriate place to post, please feel free to let me know and I shall be on my way. image

I have a couple questions. I recently took my coins out of storage and placed almost all of them (what a project) into 2x2s for protection / organization. Among the coins was a bag of war nickels. I would very much like to be able to better see them to see if maybe I got one of the 42P double eyes I read about. The problem is that they are very tarnished. In the state they are in it is sort of hard to inspect them closely as they are so dark. I do not want to clean them if I should not. My question is should they be cleaned at all or left alone? If cleanable what should I use?

This leads to question 2. What is the difference (if there is one) between tarnished coins and toned coins? I tend to believe that there is a difference as I often see coins with wonderful colors to them, my nickels are all simply dark gry/brown.

My final question for now concerns a coin I have I want to send in for grading. It is a 1884 GSA CC Morgan Dollar. I sent my other GSA coin (1883 cc) into PCGS some years ago, but the instructions told me to take the coin out of any holder and place it in a plastic holder, which I did. I recieved my coin back MS63 image. The 1884 is in much better shape, back when I submitted the 1883 I thought it would be worth more cause it was a year older, now I know its all about condition, condition, condition (and rarity, and age, hehe). I saw on Ebay that PCGS can differentiate between GSA and non GSA coins. This obviously means that you can somehow submit the coin in its container. What I want to know is how I do this. Also, should I do this? Is it better to have it certified GSA? I do not plan on selling it, but it would be nice to have it certified as best I can.

Thank you for your time and any input would be appreciated, and again, if I am in the wrong place let me know.

Rob
Rob the Newbie

Comments

  • LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
    Be Bop A Lula!!!
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • Welcome aboard! image
    Paul in Pine Hill
    ----------------------------------------
    My ebay auctions

  • Welcome to the board. I would not crack out the GSA for grading. If you really want it graded, send it to NGC, which will grade it in the goverment case. There is a strong demand for GSAs in their original holders.
  • Welcome aboard !!!!

    The only stupid questions around here are the ones that people are afraid to ask, so ask away!!!

    On the war nickles - think you can dip them in acetone to clean some of the tarnish off, but DO NOT rub them. You don't even need to rinse the acetone off because it will evaporate and leave no residue on the coin.

    The difference between toning and tarnish is the chemicals involved and the colors that they create - tarnish is a tone, it's just not considered as attractive as some other forms of toning.

    For the GSA coins - I would submit them to NGC. NGC will certify them in the GSA holder (w/o breaking them out of the holder). I would think that they will hold more value that way than by breaking them out and simply putting GSA on the slab.
    Cecil
    Total Copper Nutcase - African, British Ships, Channel Islands!!!
    'Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup'
  • Welcome to our full band of merr collectors!!
  • Rob85635Rob85635 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭
    Thank you all for your kind reception.

    In regards to dipping the coins as your recommend, will that detract from their desirability? How long do you dip them in acetone? I saw some silver cleaner in a plastic container at the jewelry counter of a department store. Is that more desirable to dip coins in?

    Thanks

    Rob
    Rob the Newbie
  • Welcome to the boards image.
    image

    image
  • fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    Welcome.

    I am one who believes coins should not be cleaned by novices. Too many coins are ruined by dipping or whatever. If a coin is really bad, maybe it could be sent to NCS. They make a determination before proceeding, so if there is a chance the coin won't conserve, they leave it alone.

    If you do decide to try dipping on your own, get a common roll of unc dimes, and experiment on those. Whatever you do, don't start trying to conserve without getting some experience. Again, all too many coins are ruined by people with good intensions.

    Tony

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Welcome aboard.

    I have dipped a Proof Eisenhower $1 in a solution of 50% Jewel Luster and 50% distilled water. Held the coin in the mixter for about 10 seconds then rinsed it in pure distilled water. I patted it dry in a clean cotton towel and it appeared to have done the trick.

    I have dipped a silver coin, to experiment, in acetone and that also worked but not as well as the previously described method. I have done this only to experment in both procedures.

    I collect colonials, so I don't do much dipping at all!
    Constellatio Collector sevenoften@hotmail.com
    ---------------------------------
    "No Good Deed Goes Unpunished!"
    "If it don't make $"
    "It don't make cents""
  • Welcome!

    Wow! Just think, there are 85,634 other Robs on the CU message boards. Amazing!



    imageimage
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    Here's a big fat welcome to ya!image

    You have come to the right place to ask questions.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,720 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Welcome aboard.

    Each individual collector draws his own line between toning and tarnish. Generally
    if he finds it attractive then it's toning. If it's borderline then it's heavy toning, and
    if it's unattractive it's tarnish. If it actually pits the coin or is very ugly then it's cor-
    rosion.

    Very small corrosion on copper is often called spotting or carbon spots.

    In checking for varieties (especially new ones), it's often helpful to lay out like coins
    on their obverse on a flat surface. As you look from coin to coin the differences will
    stand out better. Be sure to look at them with and without magnification.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Welcome to the forums. I`ve never dipped a coin but, from what I`ve read on these boards is that it is, to some degree, accepted. It`s a risky procedure because there is a very high risk of striping the luster of a mint state coin. It`s considered a negative when the luster is stripped or dulled because it`s one of the main parts of the beauty of a mint state coin. So use some discretion when you do dip on some of the better coins that you may dip. As some have already suggested, practice dipping on cheap, inexpensive coins so you`ll be able to fine tune on how to do it properly.

    Some, maybe alot of, collectors like the look of an " origanal " toned coin because of the aestetic appeal and the untampered element of an " original " toned coin. " Original " meaning never been cleaned or dipped. It`s not always easy to determine an " original " from one that isn`t and is a cause of debate when it isn`t clear cut. Here`s an example of one I consider to be an attractive " original " coin.

    imageimage
  • big welcome image
    Michael


  • << <i> Here`s an example of one I consider to be an attractive " original " coin. >>



    I like that coin and wouldn't touch that toning either. Especially on circulated coins, you can end up with an unnatural looking coin - and enhance every ding, scratch or other distraction - by dipping it.
    Time sure flies when you don't know what you are doing...

    CoinPeople.com || CoinWiki.com || NumisLinks.com
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    Toning is pretty tarnish
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • Rob85635Rob85635 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭
    Here is a picture of one of the coins in question. I am sorry for the bottom white in the picture, I need to learn more about photoshop elements. Also, sorry for the bad pics.

    What did you use to get that terrific picture ccr?

    I have a bunch of these war nickels, perhaps 50 or so, all in varying conditions and varying amounts of tarnish. The one pictured represents an average coin, some are darker, some lighter. Looking at the picture what do you think? leave them all alone? I am beginning to think so.


    Rob
    Rob the Newbie
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,720 ✭✭✭✭✭
    These appear very typical for circulated war nickels. these darkened very rapidly
    in circulation and are almost always dark by the time they wear to low grade XF.

    Most collectors prefer these in original condition even when they are dark.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • YOOO AYYYYYYYYYYYE! Welcome!...image
    What is money, in reality, but dirty pieces of paper and metal upon which privilege is stamped?
  • Welcome to the Forums Rob85635!!! image
    Glenn
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Greetings fellow collector.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • wingedlibertywingedliberty Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭
    Here is a full band welcome to ya.image
    I hope you enjoy yourself here.
  • ms71ms71 Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Welcome aboard!
    Successful BST transactions: EagleEye, Christos, Proofmorgan,
    Coinlearner, Ahrensdad, Nolawyer, RG, coinlieutenant, Yorkshireman, lordmarcovan, Soldi, masscrew, JimTyler, Relaxn, jclovescoins, justindan, doubleeagle07

    Now listen boy, I'm tryin' to teach you sumthin' . . . . that ain't no optical illusion, it only looks like an optical illusion.

    My mind reader refuses to charge me. . . . . . .
  • From one new guy to another, welcome. Bob
    Pecunia in arbotis non crescit.


  • << <i>What did you use to get that terrific picture ccr? >>



    A Hewlett-Packard scanner. I don`t have a digital camera but, digital cameras do take better pictures and pick-up details that a scanner can`t.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file