Copper experts, does this Two Cent Piece look like it might be a proof?


Large images here:
Click for large obverse image.
Click for large reverse image.
The surfaces do seem prooflike, much more so than my mint state examples. But, I don't have any experience with these in proof - or any early copper proofs for that matter - so I don't know how to determine it one way or another.
What do you guys think? Proof or circulation strike?
Russ, NCNE
0
Comments
For what it's worth, here is a Proof of that date:
<< <i>Definitely not, Russ - sorry. >>
Mark,
Don't be sorry, I'm GLAD it's not a proof. I don't collect them so if it was I'd have to figure out some way to get rid of it and start trying to find another 1869.
<< <i>A proof with a die crack. Kind of doubt it. >>
Yeah, it has a BUNCH of them. I think it's pretty cool.
Russ, NCNE
It's a very nice looking coin!
Here, I'll add a thread magnet: PCGS sucks!
Russ, NCNE
Currently raw, formerly NGC MS64RB.
Russ, NCNE
Look for yourself.
Ray
<< <i>Diagnostic for the proof is the missing serif on the top of the "D" in UNITED on the reverse.
Look for yourself. >>
Actually, many of the business strike Two Cent Pieces have an incomplete D - including this one.
Russ, NCNE
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Ray
<< <i>Great photo Russ. I think it's a wonderful coin. Whoever you got that from must have quite an eye. >>
Mark,
You want to hear something funny? Despite the trials and tribulations thus far, it is actually my favorite piece.
Russ, NCNE
I'm a year off, but y'all have given me another opportunity to show mine, yet again:
I'm thinking of selling it. Just thinkin', mind you. Haven't made up my mind.