What grade in a coin would you expect if you read the following description...
<< <i>This is a well struck half dollar with sharp detail. A white monster with beautiful shimmering mirrors. Clean surfaces with stunning contrast fill this gem. A true PCGS beauty and a must have for any collection. >>
Edited to add: This is a modern proof.
Russ, NCNE
0
Comments
Cameron Kiefer
Would some of the want-to-be lawyers on this board claim that they would then have to send you a coin that actually fits that discription!
I'm sure I'm setting myself up, but with "sharp details" and "Clean surfaces", you would expect at least an MS-64, right?
JJacks
Russ, NCNE
OK - Fine then.
I would say I would expect PF67 out of that description - then again, I don't know much about proofs! I guess the "stunning contrast" could make a CAM or DCAM as well, right?
JJacks
One might assume so from the description.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>This is a well struck half dollar with sharp detail. A white monster with beautiful shimmering mirrors. Clean surfaces with stunning contrast fill this gem. A true PCGS beauty and a must have for any collection >>
This is a well struck half dollar with sharp detail. - If it's a proof, then why waste your breath - it's supposed to be this way.
A white monster with beautiful shimmering mirrors. - Let the coin do it's own talking
Clean surfaces with stunning contrast fill this gem. - same as above
A true PCGS beauty and a must have for any collection. I'll be the judge of that!
Ergo - over priced
White monster - untoned
shimmering mirrors - deep black mirrors
clean surfaces - no hairlining, milkspots, or field frost
stunning contrast - cameo devices
PR67Cam minimum, PR69Dcam best case.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Russ, NCNE
I've yet to see "shimmering " mirrors on any PF64 (modern, not a seated proof).
Brian.
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003