opinions

pontiacinf · February 28, 2003 4:51AM

my purchase

well guys looks like that can be conserved...maybe i can do myself with ms70...if slabbed as dcam its big $$$$$$

opinions?

DanC · February 28, 2003 4:53AM

Sweet!

Hopefully those aren't embedded milk-spots.
Beautiful coin!

dorkkarl · February 28, 2003 4:57AM

those spots can't be removed.

K S

eagle7 · February 28, 2003 5:01AM

Its been dipped, probably numerous times, the spots can not be removed with ms70. Maybe NCS can do something with it, but until then its probably an pr 63 or 64 and I would not be too sure about the cam, blacklights and digital modifications can be very decieving. Im not saying this one is that way, just not sure that is all. JMHO.

MadMarty · February 28, 2003 5:01AM

I like the nice big fat fingers on the coin.

Russ · February 28, 2003 5:02AM

Karl is correct. If, as stated in the auction, that is glue residue, it is not removable without damaging the fields. I'd also note that this seller is not stupid. If he thought the coin would go DCAM, it would have been submitted (or maybe it has?). In addition, since it is not specifically mentioned one way or the other, I have to wonder about hairlining on this coin.

Russ, NCNE

Baley · February 28, 2003 5:03AM

uh oh, rub and tics on the highpoints. be sure to tilt it in some good light and look for color change.

pontiacinf · February 28, 2003 6:58AM

well coin is now in hand...let me open and examine...

littlewicher · February 28, 2003 7:08AM

This seller deals in slabs. Chances are that if it would make CAM, he most likely probably would have submitted it himself already? That proof walker he has sure looks like a beauty. I bet if that haze and stuff could be taken off, it would go CAM. A really beautiful coin.

ah · February 28, 2003 7:12AM

Nice spotted coin!But, sweet indeed.

opinions

Comments

Leave a Comment