Options
GTG - Dual Denver Buffalo Nickels
Goob
Posts: 652 ✭✭✭✭✭
Another Guess the Grade, this time with my two Buffalo Nickels, mainly just since I have a third coming, I thought it’d be fun to do one of these.
This will end after 35 guesses or 48 hours, whichever comes first. Good luck!




"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably
1
Comments
I'll go 66 on both, I like the old fatty NGC. Nice coins but the strikes could be better.
Collector, occasional seller
Agree, other than I perfer the luster on the PCGS coin a bit better.
Personally (at least in-hand) I like the 1938’s frosty luster over the 1937’s satiny luster, but to each their own, of course
"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably
Mr. Goob,
I'll go with MS 64 on both (but the photos could be clearer).
64, 65
My Toned Coins • Seated Liberty Dimes
65/66
64 and 64
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS88
65/66
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Agree. Is that a fingerprint on the head of the 37D?
Yes, especially the NGC coin.
Gary TheGasMan - Retired Hank Hill
Honestly I get an AU details obv scratch vibe from the photo, but maybe I'm picking up some defects on the plastic. So my guess is P64, N66.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Here’s another attempt at decent imaging




Kept the reverse image for the 1937-D because it’s really difficult to take good pictures of Buffalo nickels with a phone, this one was especially hard
"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably
Both look like nice coins. I see a couple ticks and things, but I'm going to guess they are both graded 65.
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
1) MS65
2) MS66
65 for both. Nice coins @Goob.
The two are both 65.
Pete
Any chance we could get photos of just the coins (no slab shots)?
If not, I understand.
I would change my above MS66 (both coins) vote to MS67s now, if that is permissible.
Off photos 63 for both.
64/64
sure thing!


1937-D ⬆️
1938-D ⬇️

"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably
The 1938-D represents real quality in terms of the strike, the overall look, and a high MS population survived. The 1937-D is excellent as well… but no cigar in comparison to the 38-D. The 38-D is likely 66 and the 37-D is likely 65. One of the positives about this series is one can still obtain an attractive type Buff for a reasonable sum of money… the same can be said for the 1913- either type as plenty were saved.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Thanks for the new pics.
I'm sticking with my MS67 GTG picks.
Too many marks on cheek for MS 67 on the 37D. Maybe chance for 66, my guess is 65+
64 & 65
If your 1936 Buffalo is an MS64, these two could easily be a couple of point+ s higher.
MS 66 on both
No way.
Maybe the 38D definitely not the 37D. Even if I don’t get a gold sticker my coin beats these two on eye appeal easily as they have intense luster from the chrome like liquid fields and super strike. The 37D strike is lacking. . However they are nice coins but the 38D is much nicer