Options
Should auction listings include the date on which the guarantee expires or expired?
Now that NGC grade and authenticity guarantees are only good for 10 years, the date of expiration can be an important consideration. At the very least, I would think eBay would want to require the disclosure.
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
4
Comments
I was wondering why they started including the grade date on the certification page. Now I know why.
Is this all coins or only copper? When did they drop that little gem? Before I would pay them to re-certify all my coins for liquidation, I would just cross all of them to a competitor.
I will treat all NGC coins as raw going forward.
I can understand grade ... but authenticity is a bust. I agree with cameonut2011 above.
OMG ... My Mother was Right about Everything!
I wake up with a Good Attitude Every Day. Then … Idiots Happen!
Does NGC lack confidence in their graders/authenticators?
End Systemic Elitism - It Takes All of Us
ANA LM, LSCC, EAC, FUN
It's the typical private equity model: Lie to your customers and promise them one thing, then don't deliver.
Most of my NGC coins were graded long ago and for them to retroactively void the guarantee seems fraudulent to me. No worries. I bought quality pieces so I will move them out of NGC plastic pronto. Thank goodness most are CACed and are guaranteed to cross to CACG.
NGC is no longer a top tier grading service IMHO. It joins ICG, ANACS, and PCI. Going forward PCGS and CACG only for me. I will treat the test as raw.
I can understand a limitation on the guarantee for copper and copper-nickel coins that can deteriorate in the slab. Initially, the NGC guarantee excepted those all together, but it was relaxed to a 10 year cut-off. The guarantee was made more generous not less, and I question whether NGC can legally retroactively amend its guarantee to include silver and gold coins. It would seem that NGC would be breaching its contract.
There are so many collectors out there attracted to the old no line fatty allure and frequently rumored stricter grading; however, there are a lot of instances of liberal grading in that period particularly with respect to PL coinage, and those collectors are now screwed.
I think that due to the deserved outcry and possible lawsuits they changed it so the 10 year time frame is only starting now and not retroactive to old coins.
Either way, absolutely despicable business practices from NGC. I hope they go out of business before they can be taken public and divested from their private equity overlords.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
That is still legally dubious as the guarantee attaches at the grading event when the submitter paid the submission fee. Regardless, NGC can bite me.
Do you remember where you might have seen this? The website says 10 years from grading. It really does appear that NGC is trying to retroactively void the guarantee for all coins graded before 2016. I find this very sleazy.
Besides being a terrible look, I have a hard time understanding how this is actually supposed to save money for NGC.
I know that counterfeits will sometimes make it through slabbing. The micro-O Morgans are an obvious example, and more recently the bust dimes that were outed on this board. So clearly more than zero. Is it enough more than zero to be worth talking about?
Of the ones that get through, how many of those are still floating around after 10 years?
I wonder if this is an accounting issue, where NGC doesn't want to keep an unbounded liability on their books. That's legitimate. Or at least legitimate-ish, from a pure accounting perspective, ignoring their business model. I mean, Guaranty is right in their name.
:-(
I suspect the goal is to force a large number of regrades to renew the guarantee and generate revenue. I predict this will blow up in their face and have the opposite effect. I now see a NGC slab as a liability. The reputational damage done cannot be completely fixed even if it reverses course now.
Personally, I’m not sure it matters much to me. If I like a coin at auction, I’m going to bid on it regardless of when it was graded.
On color, as far as I know neither NGC nor PCGS guarantees copper color designations like RD or RB anymore, since copper can turn in the holder at any time. It’s long been up to the buyer to decide whether a coin still deserves its color designation.
For everything else under the new 10-year limit, it feels to me like a way to get collectors to keep sending coins back for regrading to renew the guarantee. What NGC actually guarantees, authenticity and an accurate grade at the time of grading, rarely changes while a coin sits in the holder. And the problems that do develop over time, like milk spots, haze, and PVC, are excluded from the guarantee no matter how old the slab is.
As for retroactivity, the guarantee page has no effective date or grandfathering language, so as written it seems to apply to every NGC slab. That would mean coins graded more than 10 years ago are no longer covered at all, even for authenticity or overgrading. If that’s the intent, I wonder whether there are legal issues with changing the terms on coins people already bought relying on the old guarantee.
It was in a group chat of knowledgeable collectors but I did not read it myself which is why I said "I think". I'm confident my friends are correct but I can't lay my hands on a link to confirm it at the moment.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
Too harsh I believe.
NGC is owned by a private equity firm.
My belief is they all had a company meeting and told NGC this is what you're going to do.
I highly doubt that. It’s not really how BX operates in my experience.
I would guess that BX is looking to monetize NGC and their warranty liability needs disclosure on a potential S-1 or has the potential to be a diligence item in a sale. They are looking to cap it and NGC (not BX) chose poorly in how to execute.
Latin American Collection
Limiting the guarantee while sending email looking for graders. No experience required.
Latin American Collection
Yes, I think disclosure of new authentication policy is important.
Grading is fluid and sometimes a moving target. But authentication limits? That's a concern.
Not sure if that is a PE driven decision. Could be future tech related. Wasn't there a huge sportscard counterfeit ring uncovered?
I don’t think the “No previous experience is necessary” is a big deal. It should have said “No previous professional grading experience is necessary.” But either way, there are probably many potential excellent graders out there, who, with training, could qualify. It’s better for NGC to have too many applicants than too few.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Does NGC have an automatic way to get this info at eBay's scale?
If not, would the individual sellers be responsible for posting the date?
I sure hope eBay removes it from its list of approved grading services. Every coin needs to be checked manually.
The PNG should ditch them too.
Is anyone here active on the NGC coin forums? If so, how are they reacting to this change of policy over there?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I post there occasionally and didn’t see a discussion on this topic. But I might have missed it, so I started a thread asking about it, a short while ago: https://boards.ngccoin.com/topic/441027-can-someone-post-a-linklinks-to-discussions-regarding-the-changes-to-ngc’s-guarantee-i-must-have-missed-it/
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
There were a whopping 2 posts in a related thread. It really is dead over there.
https://boards.ngccoin.com/topic/440990-anyone-notice-something-new-on-the-cert-verification-page/
Ebay could flag that new policy using software by photo image of slab, or description.
@MFeld
Is Heritage planning any change in policy with respect to NGC coins?
@ianrussell
Is GC planning any change in policy with respect to NGC coins?
Raw coins still sell. Certainly given that the holder is the highest quality without the raised parts that show even the slightest rub or scratch. Or how about the coin staying centered in the 'raw' holder rather than rattling around upside down. The raw coin holder may not have chipped edges or fins as well.
All joking aside I understand these changes will likely be industry wide over time and it just further exposes the risk taken upon purchase of collectables especially in the 5 or 6 figure dollar range.
What happens if NGC decides to shutdown?
Thats a good question but I dont think its there responsibility to clarify 3rd party grading policy or even disclose it. Auction houses do not have long term guaratees. It is good that this information is in this thread as it is important. Pretty poor move especially for resale in the future of NGC coins.
Its been said that education is important especially for dopes like me.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS88
I’m not aware of any, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be any.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I'm pretty sure auction houses will have, if they do not already a disclaimer provision. Spelling out the sale of any TPG item and the authenticity guarantees and the specific termination periods.
Auctioning authentic merch is a big deal for the reputation of all parties involved.
From Heritage's T&Cs:
COINS & CURRENCY TERM C: Coins sold referencing a third-party grading service are sold “as is”
without any express or implied warranty, except for a guarantee by Auctioneer that they are genuine.
Certain warranties may be available from the grading services and the Bidder is referred to them for
further details:
COINS & CURRENCY TERM F: Since we cannot examine encapsulated coins or notes, they are sold “as
is” without our grading opinion, and may not be returned for any reason. Auctioneer shall not be
liable for any patent or latent defect or controversy pertaining to or arising from any encapsulated
collectible. In any such instance, purchaser’s remedy, if any, shall be solely against the service
certifying the collectible.
FWIW...
Corporate entities do not like open ended liabilities no matter how likley they are. I do not see this as an indictment
as to NGC's athenticity while Rick montgomery is overseeing Authenticity. The real test will be whether any other service follows. Possibly the recent trend of reliance on graders vs Numismatist/Authenticators has had more of a negative impact than expected. I know ANACS does not presently intend to follow as we have the lowest buyback rate of any grading service. I wonder if this is to shield against changes in market acceptance of varieties like 1914/3 nickels, 1922 "NO D" cents, Proof vs Business strike calls. J.P. Martin
62 yrs in Coins, 42 yrs Certifying/Grading, CoinWorld's Most Influential People In Numismatics, 1960-2020. 30 consecutive yrs teaching ANA Summer seminar, Numismatic Ambassador award, 1998 Doctorate in Numismatics, Glenn Smedley Award, ANA Governor 2009/2011, Author/ Host of ANA's best selling video's, courses on grading & counterfeit detection. Taught over 1,100 paying students, Secret service agents, San Diego to Boston, Anchorage to Miami, including 2 coin cruise lecturer. many Free presentations. NLG book and video awards. ANA photographer, SEM operator, ASA Appraiser, Contributor to Redbook, Numismatist, Coin World, Numismatic News, ANA Grading Guides, 40,000 Volume Library, Founder ANAAB, ICG, 1995 ANA collector services appraisal/conservation, First full service Ancient coin grading service. Navy 75-77, WIU 77-81, Dealer1981-1984, ANA 1984-1998, 60 year Collector U.S./ 50 Year Ancient coins. ANA Advisory Committee. Life member ANA, ANS. Semi-retired grader in Denver area
Then don’t create them.
A couple of things to clarify.
First, just because NGC disclaims liability for coins graded more than 10 years ago doesn’t mean they won’t sometimes or even usually make good anyway. In fact, I’ve heard of a couple of cases of that happening just recently. (In both cases, the payments were significant and not completely unreasonable, but less than the owners thought was appropriate.)
And second, I really did want answers to the question I asked in the OP. To me, I don’t think it’s enough for an auction company to bury their disclaimers in the fine print. If a major coin auction firm is offering an NGC coin that was certified 10+ years ago, I think the lot description should include a warning that the NGC guarantee has expired. And if graded less than 10 years ago, it should say when.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Does CAC stcikering transfer any potential liability on a bad coin? J.P. Martin
62 yrs in Coins, 42 yrs Certifying/Grading, CoinWorld's Most Influential People In Numismatics, 1960-2020. 30 consecutive yrs teaching ANA Summer seminar, Numismatic Ambassador award, 1998 Doctorate in Numismatics, Glenn Smedley Award, ANA Governor 2009/2011, Author/ Host of ANA's best selling video's, courses on grading & counterfeit detection. Taught over 1,100 paying students, Secret service agents, San Diego to Boston, Anchorage to Miami, including 2 coin cruise lecturer. many Free presentations. NLG book and video awards. ANA photographer, SEM operator, ASA Appraiser, Contributor to Redbook, Numismatist, Coin World, Numismatic News, ANA Grading Guides, 40,000 Volume Library, Founder ANAAB, ICG, 1995 ANA collector services appraisal/conservation, First full service Ancient coin grading service. Navy 75-77, WIU 77-81, Dealer1981-1984, ANA 1984-1998, 60 year Collector U.S./ 50 Year Ancient coins. ANA Advisory Committee. Life member ANA, ANS. Semi-retired grader in Denver area
I agree with you 100%.
The auction houses didn’t mention anything about copper coins or milk spots on Silver Eagles not being covered under the TPG guarantees. So I don’t think they will mention this either. It would be nice but I think the fine print is where it will remain buried.
I'm not an auction company so I can't say why they do the things they do, but it seems to me the purpose of having the fine print is to cover all the things that are common across their entire catalog of auction offerings and use the individual auction listing to describe that particular item. I suppose they could include the Terms and Conditions in every auction listing but that doesn't seem like it would be an improvement.
edited to add... The market values coins differently depending on the particular TPG holder, is that something that should be included in every description?
I mistakenly thought that NGC including the grading date was an improvement......until now.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907/publishedset/15628
March of Time - 27 Centuries in Gold
https://coins.www.collectors-society.com/WCM/CoinCustomSetView.aspx?s=36590
WOW! Heard on another thread,
I did not know Rick Montgomery was retiring. I am unaware of a single talent that can replace him. I worked with him in the early-mid 1980's. He was the sharp and fast then and has only gotten better. True Numismatists are hard to replace. I am sure his influence has strengthed his grading room, just as his retirement weakens it.
I am semi-retired at ANACS, Mike Fahey makes the calls now, We all had our origins in early ANACS. Rick was the 18 year old kid then, fresh out of high school. Tom Delorey was 27, Mike Fahey was 26, I was 27, when we started. End of an ERA. J.P.Martin
62 yrs in Coins, 42 yrs Certifying/Grading, CoinWorld's Most Influential People In Numismatics, 1960-2020. 30 consecutive yrs teaching ANA Summer seminar, Numismatic Ambassador award, 1998 Doctorate in Numismatics, Glenn Smedley Award, ANA Governor 2009/2011, Author/ Host of ANA's best selling video's, courses on grading & counterfeit detection. Taught over 1,100 paying students, Secret service agents, San Diego to Boston, Anchorage to Miami, including 2 coin cruise lecturer. many Free presentations. NLG book and video awards. ANA photographer, SEM operator, ASA Appraiser, Contributor to Redbook, Numismatist, Coin World, Numismatic News, ANA Grading Guides, 40,000 Volume Library, Founder ANAAB, ICG, 1995 ANA collector services appraisal/conservation, First full service Ancient coin grading service. Navy 75-77, WIU 77-81, Dealer1981-1984, ANA 1984-1998, 60 year Collector U.S./ 50 Year Ancient coins. ANA Advisory Committee. Life member ANA, ANS. Semi-retired grader in Denver area
It doesn’t transfer liability from NGC to CAC, but it does transfer risk. By which I mean that if CAC takes a bad stickered coin off the market, it may no longer have any recourse with NGC. And if the market punishes the value of NGC coins because the guarantee is gone, then CAC will take a bigger loss when they sell the newly unstickered coin back into the market.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Sometimes, auction houses will like to the TPG cert page.
Does anyone know what will happen with NGC Certificate Verification after 10 years? Does it stay up as now, does it stay up with a certificate lapsed message, or is it simply not certified and doesn't appear in the database lookup?
Sample size of one: https://www.ngccoin.com/certlookup/1540145-168/69/
I wonder if CAC will change its policy in reviewing older NGC coins.
I wonder why they keep this misleading statement near the bottom of the "Verify NGC Certification" page.
.
.
"NGC Guarantee
Every NGC-certified coin is backed by the industry-leading NGC Guarantee , which provides greater protection for both buyers and sellers"
"To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin