Options
Grade opinion on T1 SLQ
ad4400
Posts: 2,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
Have the set home and playing with a new photo set up. Interested in folks’s thoughts as far as grade on this piece. At least on my phone the pictures don’t appear crisp enough to determine full head or not, please feel free to chime in if you can discern. All pictures are the same coin with just different lighting.
Liberty Nickel Digital Album
Buffalo Nickel Digital Album
Toned Buffalo Date SetDigital Album
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/411385 7070 Registry<
Buffalo Nickel Digital Album
Toned Buffalo Date SetDigital Album
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/411385 7070 Registry<
0
Comments
For me, the pictures are too large on my computer screen.
MS-63. Flashy luster yet has contact marks and dullness on the high points.
"But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
BHNC #AN-10
JRCS #1606
AU58 FH. There appears to be light wear above the knee. But the pictures are less than optimal. So it might not be wear.
MS-61 FH
Official PCGS account of:
www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com
I’d go with MS63FH. However, the images aren’t of good quality and a grade as low as 58FH wouldn’t surprise me.
Edited to add: So far, the replies have been grade opinions, but not necessarily “Great opinion on T1 SLQ”
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Genuine based on the pics..
Looks clearly AU to me, whether it is AU55 or AU58 would depend on the look in-hand, but the coin is AU.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Looks like some phone filtered images to me.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
+1
For what reason?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Too much contrast and image compression to be useful images. Please try again.
There's clearly wear on Liberty's leg from above the knee down to the foot. However, I don't see signs of wear in the fields and the toning looks nice and even over most of the coin.
So to me, this is the epitome of a coin than could go either 58FH or 63FH.
63 FH
58 FH
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Can't tell from those photos; too much sharpening applied, and no way to tell luster. It's a very good strike, and probably FH. But it looks like there is rub on Liberty's right leg. I would go with 58FH.
55
58
AU