Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Are Privy Marks a fad, or will they become as important as Mintmarks?

The past year seems to have been a boom for privy marks. We have had the Omega Cent, US soccer team privy on the Silver Eagles, the 9/11 Half Dollars, and the 4th of July privies on many coins.

Will the privys really become highly collectable, and expensive, varieties...or will they fade away with only specialist interest and small premiums?

Im curious what the collector community thinks about this.

Comments

  • Options
    GuzziSportGuzziSport Posts: 611 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 4, 2026 10:57AM

    Fad, artificially generated “scarcity” which is of zero numismatic interest.
    My $0.02…

    Other passions include golf, Moto Guzzi motorcycles, and Euro motorcycles in general.
    Chris

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,613 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Mints (and not just the US mint) intentionally creating "scarce/rare collectibles" are the reason I no longer collect modern coins.

  • Options
    jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 2,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    collecting oddball holders was a fad

  • Options
    Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,722 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fad

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP PROMETHIUS88

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,613 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MrEureka said:
    In a world where collectors still
    want both T1 and T2 1979 and 1981 proof sets, I would not rule out the possibility that collectors will still want the privy varieties for their sets in 50 years.

    No doubt, some will. Will that be lots of collectors or a few? I don't know.

    Regarding what collectors choose to collect- is it in the Redbook and what holes are in the albums? How many fewer people would want a 37-D three legged buffalo, if there wasn't a spot for it and it wasn't listed in coin guides and pricelists? Personally, I think a lot fewer.

  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 17,896 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They exist, therefore they will be collected.

    Will they be valuable? That remains to be seen.

  • Options

    Not a fan. Feels like a fad. Too many to keep up with, just feels like a cash grab.

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 34,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fad (dont over do it guys)

  • Options
    HarlequinHarlequin Posts: 269 ✭✭✭

    Well they definitely won't be as important as mintmarks to collectors but they're out there and they will continue to garner interest from some but long term I don't think they will hold any significant value or premium 😎

    🇺🇸 Harlequin
    harlequinnumismatic@gmail.com
    Home of the Americana Collection of USA silver coins

  • Options
    element159element159 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭

    Mostly a fad.

    Mint marks have a very long history, and of course have been readily available in circulation for ages. These privy marks are intentional and artificial rarities, if they are intended for circulation at all. I don't consider the privy marks interesting, but I would like to find one of the circulating ones in circulation, and if I ever wanted a 'complete' type set, I figure I would need one of them. I'd draw the line at just one of the privies, trying to get all of them is playing a suckers game imo.

  • Options
    DesertCoinDesertCoin Posts: 501 ✭✭✭

    I think in a world where large letters, small letters, micro S, trumpet S, small date, med date, large date, overdate, rpm, ddo, ddr, type 1, type 2, V.D.B., no cents, large motto, small motto, open 3, closed 3, tall date, rev 1, rev, 2, rev 3, and vast amounts of other relatively uninteresting micro varieties continue to be avidly collected, privy marks will hold their own as varieties of interest. I'm told even mintmarks were not of great interest to collectors in general before Whitman boards popularized them.

    However I do foresee a change in numismatics with the coming generations of collectors. From what I have observed, serious young collectors tend to focus less on complete sets or micro varieties, but more on superb coins, individual rarities (ex. owning an 1877 1c MS64RB PCGS CAC while ignoring other Indian cents altogether), and type coins. This is not universal by any means, but I do feel a shift in general with younger avid collectors.

    If this mentality becomes more standard and set building declines, privies along with other micro varieties, would likely suffer. If the current way of collecting remain standard, they're not going anywhere.

    “Land of the free because of the brave”
    “Saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone”
    In Deo solo confidimus
    ΙΧΘΥΣ
    ΙϹ ΧϹ ΝΙΚΑ (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ ΝΙΚΑ)


    Member since 2026
    Successful BST transactions with: Ted 1, JWP, bigjpst, Vetter, nickelsciolist, ajaan, USMarine6, ad4400, grote15, coinbuf, Gothat3rs, No Headlights, PROMETHIUS88, Harlequin, Coin Finder, Coins3675, CKcollectibles2
  • Options
    Alpha2814Alpha2814 Posts: 399 ✭✭✭✭

    @element159 said:
    Mint marks have a very long history, and of course have been readily available in circulation for ages. These privy marks are intentional and artificial rarities, if they are intended for circulation at all.

    See also: W-mint quarters. Privies are just a way of doing this at scale.

  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,232 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pogo sticks, hula hoops, & yo-yo’s are fads. Privy marks are an assault on normal collectors’ ways, but we are a resilient lot.

    Practice makes perfect & nobody is perfect. So, practice being nobody.

  • Options
    IkesTIkesT Posts: 4,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Are Privy Marks a fad, or will they become as important as Mintmarks?

    I'm not privy to that information.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,120 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 4, 2026 7:44PM

    Why can't the answer be "neither"? They don't have to be a fad or important, just another "thing" that some people might (or might not) care about.

    Personally, I don't think MMs are at all important and prefer privy marks to MMs. But I genuinely care very little about either.

    I'm not sure why MMs should be viewed any differently than privy marks: a mark added to a die to indicate "something".

    I don't even care that much about dates, quite frankly. (Although I'm probably in a very small group there.)

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A marketing gimmick for sure, hopefully a fad. I suppose there remain a few collectors of beanie babies out there, so privies may have followers for some time. I won’t call out some of the other fads (IMO) popular currently - I do try not to criticize what others choose to collect.

  • Options
    oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Why can't the answer be "neither"? They don't have to be a fad or important, just another "thing" that some people might (or might not) care about.

    Personally, I don't think MMs are at all important and prefer privy marks to MMs. But I genuinely care very little about either.

    I'm not sure why MMs should be viewed any differently than privy marks: a mark added to a die to indicate "something".

    I don't even care that much about dates, quite frankly. (Although I'm probably in a very small group there.)

    Agree for the most part. I have included examples of all mints in my expanded type set and certain dates, such as first and last year of types. Historical relevance pieces pertaining to our history, including numismatic history.

  • Options
    illini420illini420 Posts: 11,676 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the privy mark on the Semiquincentennial Trump Dollars showing that the coins were actually minted on USA 250 July 4, 2026. Seems like a mark that means something. Many of the other privy marks don't seem to really mean much and are much less important in my opinion.

    I think they will remain popular if they are used sparingly, only for important events/dates. But if they have several coins each year with privy marks to hunt down, it'll be too much and collectors will lose interest.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,785 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1922 US Grant commemorative silver half dollar and gold dollar coins were selling poorly so the US Mint added a star above the date to create a new variety to encourage additional coin sales. It was claimed that the star represented Grant's rank as a general during his military service. Would this star be considered a privy mark? Also, would the "CAL." punched on the reverse die of the 1848 $2.5 gold coin be considered a privy mark?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    IkesTIkesT Posts: 4,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    The 1922 US Grant commemorative silver half dollar and gold dollar coins were selling poorly so the US Mint added a star above the date to create a new variety to encourage additional coin sales. It was claimed that the star represented Grant's rank as a general during his military service. Would this star be considered a privy mark? Also, would the "CAL." punched on the reverse die of the 1848 $2.5 gold coin be considered a privy mark?

    I'm not privy to that information either.

  • Options
    OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    The 1922 US Grant commemorative silver half dollar and gold dollar coins were selling poorly so the US Mint added a star above the date to create a new variety to encourage additional coin sales. It was claimed that the star represented Grant's rank as a general during his military service. Would this star be considered a privy mark? Also, would the "CAL." punched on the reverse die of the 1848 $2.5 gold coin be considered a privy mark?

    I believe so, yes.

  • Options
    cptbillycptbilly Posts: 159 ✭✭✭✭

    I'm an ASE collector with a "completist" compulsion. The PM issues were added to my checklist as they were affordable additions to my collection. I think the USM will continue to add PMs to its coinage.

  • Options
    fastfreddiefastfreddie Posts: 2,974 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It would be more collectable if left unknown when issued by the mint then discovered later on by a collector.

    It is not that life is short, but that you are dead for so very long.
  • Options
    scotty1419scotty1419 Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭✭

    Something tells me in a short 1-3 years they'll suddenly stop like the late night coin-fomercial material they are.

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Once the "right" people have made money on them and departed from the scene they will fade in importance and interest. Essentially, they are just another modern made-for-collector item.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,838 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They're a fad and they will become more important than the mint marks of the coins they're on.

    They're going to dictate value because people will throw money at them coming from the mint and in the secondary market without regard to what mint they come from. Circulation production attempts to balance the load at both mints, so there's not really a concept of one being scarcer than the others. They're a cheap and easy way to manufacture a rarity at the mint. What will make them a fad is when the mint kills their golden goose and people tire of chasing them. Maybe they make one with a privy mark collector privy mark (I think there was a Conder token like that).

    Thing is, once they stop doing that, they'll have to find a different way to move product and people making a killing flipping privy marks into the secondary market will clamor for something to take their place. One fad will be replaced by another.

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,789 ✭✭✭✭✭

    FWIW, it’s definitely a gimmick. And I wouldn’t call it a fad. I’d just call it a gimmick that is working.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    fathomfathom Posts: 2,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They are not mint marks, or as historically and geographically significant for sure.

    They can be rarities, especially considering the demand for some and the low mintages.

    From a cultural standpoint they can serve as reminders of significant events or institutions or commemorate numismatic anniversaries etc. So that is a important contribution IMO.

    My guesstimate is some will be valued, some will not down the road.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,785 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A lot will depend on how the coin industry treats privy marks. For example, will major price guides like the Red Book and Grey Sheet list and show separate prices the coins with privy marks?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,789 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    A lot will depend on how the coin industry treats privy marks. For example, will major price guides like the Red Book and Grey Sheet list and show separate prices the coins with privy marks?

    Of course they will.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,838 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    A lot will depend on how the coin industry treats privy marks. For example, will major price guides like the Red Book and Grey Sheet list and show separate prices the coins with privy marks?

    I'm sure they will, if they haven't already. The Greysheet can be more responsive to rapid market changes than the Red Book, so it makes more sense for them to be there first. Searching eBay completed auctions is probably best.

  • Options
    privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think they will have their own following similar to chop marks.

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • Options
    AdamLAdamL Posts: 233 ✭✭✭✭

    They've become boring, to me at least, very quickly.

  • Options
    RaufusRaufus Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I so hope they GO AWAY!

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • Options
    Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,815 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think they will be back in 2050.....

    The court jester does not play, but gently pulls the strings…

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file