Best of the Mint (5) 1907 Saint-Gaudens High Relief $20 Gold Coin and Silver Medal Set

Options
mbr33
mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭



Coming September 24, 2026, right at the end of the Mint’s fiscal year. Is anyone hoping to still obtain the full set? Or are you making a choice between this final coin in the Best of the Mint series and the 1804?

«134

Comments

  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    My goal is to do a box of 20; the 5 BoM issues + medals and the Proof Set.

    I will (hopefully) get both of the big gold coins. Reading the various updates here has had my confidence in their potential availability on a rollercoaster ride.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • stawick
    stawick Posts: 608 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Since I collect the AGE I am in for this 1. As of now I am going to dig deep and try for the 1804 - but its gonna sting. If I dont get that I may be OK (unlike the V75 AGE, waaaahhh :'( - heheh, I'll get over it ... some day).

    I did not like the medals on the merc dime (very "Wonder Woman" ish, and I got that silver medal) nor the 50c (especially that, Tae Chi???). This 1 is OK tho.

  • mbr33
    mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @lermish said:
    My goal is to do a box of 20; the 5 BoM issues + medals and the Proof Set.

    I will (hopefully) get both of the big gold coins. Reading the various updates here has had my confidence in their potential availability on a rollercoaster ride.

    I’m going to try. Could go either way, as there are two schools of thought running about. Let’s just hope it costs enough that the buyer’s clubs stay away.

  • jakeblue
    jakeblue Posts: 339 ✭✭✭
    Options

    1,2, and 3 are ok. 4 and 5 are absolute must haves. I don’t mind the cost as long as it helps the individual collectors by keeping the flippers away.

    I was fortunate to get the FH gold. Having all 3 of them is the goal.

    Boom...we win.

  • mbr33
    mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Mintage numbers have been posted for BOM 5 today (as well as pricing for BOM 4)

    Item Number: 26BM5
    Item Limits
    Mintage Limit: 15,000

  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @jakeblue said:
    1,2, and 3 are ok. 4 and 5 are absolute must haves. I don’t mind the cost as long as it helps the individual collectors by keeping the flippers away.

    I was fortunate to get the FH gold. Having all 3 of them is the goal.

    That is a cool set!

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    So agree w that!
    The coin and the original packaging is beautiful , but it is absolutely too small.
    I wish they would have just made it.Look exactly like the real one.

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • zeesh
    zeesh Posts: 108 ✭✭✭
    Options

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Raufus said:

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    They probably could if they really wanted to but the original is 33.4 g of 90% gold whereas the new one is 31.1g of 99.99% gold.

    That (very roughly) 10% weight difference likely explains the (very roughly) 10% smaller size. I guess they chose not to make it much thinner to keep the high relief.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • TomB
    TomB Posts: 23,189 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    At one troy ounce and a specified 30.61mm they can make the new piece be slightly deeper relief than it might otherwise have. If the intent is to have a "high relief" coin then this smaller diameter would accommodate the depth more easily.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @lermish said:

    @Raufus said:

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    They probably could if they really wanted to but the original is 33.4 g of 90% gold whereas the new one is 31.1g of 99.99% gold.

    That (very roughly) 10% weight difference likely explains the (very roughly) 10% smaller size. I guess they chose not to make it much thinner to keep the high relief.

    Create point , but I certainly would have preferred just to duplicate the original in size even if the composition is different. Most collectors probably feel the same way I would guess.

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • mbr33
    mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Last one….just 26 days away. Anyone changing their mind after watching BOM 4 sales?

  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @mbr33 said:
    Last one….just 26 days away. Anyone changing their mind after watching BOM 4 sales?

    As I mentioned in passing, I have had varying levels of anxiety regarding BOM4 availability. I was very happy to be able to buy one without stress and I'm really looking forward to receiving it Monday. I can't wait for BOM5 and am excited to see the whole group all together.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • mbr33
    mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @lermish said:

    @mbr33 said:
    Last one….just 26 days away. Anyone changing their mind after watching BOM 4 sales?

    As I mentioned in passing, I have had varying levels of anxiety regarding BOM4 availability. I was very happy to be able to buy one without stress and I'm really looking forward to receiving it Monday. I can't wait for BOM5 and am excited to see the whole group all together.

    I’m still hoping to put the whole set together. One to go. Hopefully the sale happens the same way #4 went.

  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @mbr33 said:

    @lermish said:

    @mbr33 said:
    Last one….just 26 days away. Anyone changing their mind after watching BOM 4 sales?

    As I mentioned in passing, I have had varying levels of anxiety regarding BOM4 availability. I was very happy to be able to buy one without stress and I'm really looking forward to receiving it Monday. I can't wait for BOM5 and am excited to see the whole group all together.

    I’m still hoping to put the whole set together. One to go. Hopefully the sale happens the same way #4 went.

    Agreed. Here is how a portion of my spreadsheet looks....only one more ✅ to go!

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • mbr33
    mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    There’s a decent number of us striving for that full set. Haven’t seen anyone trying it to have been skunked yet.

  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 29, 2026 8:22AM
    Options

    @mbr33 said:
    Last one….just 26 days away. Anyone changing their mind after watching BOM 4 sales?

    I'm very much leaning against it, just to do cost. Also, the BOM 4 medal is so beautiful that it's brining enough value to make the purchase price of the set closer to spot gold. I don't like the BOM 5 medal much. I don't think that it will be nearly so sought after.

    As noted in another thread, I'll be going to the DC store when BOM 5 goes on sale. I'm sure that it will be out in the display case well before noon, as was the case for BOM 4. They were happy to take it out of the case for me to see and photo before noon. I'll do the same for BOM 5 so you guys can really see what it looks like before making a buying decision at noon.

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • Manorcourtman
    Manorcourtman Posts: 8,470 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Got the 4, thankfully. Not hot on the 5 or the medal. 2009 was enough of the design repeat for me. I don't think anyone will have any issue getting the 5. It's a beautiful coin and I look forward to pics of it.

  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'm leaning against 5. I'll take a look.

    I wish it and the UHR were essentially duplicates of the original

    If I ever just dump most all of my moderns, the one thing I'll buy coin wise is a nice actual HR.

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • Nephasth
    Nephasth Posts: 206 ✭✭✭
    edited August 29, 2026 10:52AM
    Options

    .

  • TomB
    TomB Posts: 23,189 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'm thinking seriously about attempting to get one of these upon release. The only BOM I have purchased thus far is the 1804 and I think this would make a nice pair.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • jakeblue
    jakeblue Posts: 339 ✭✭✭
    Options

    My concern is that since the 1804 is now 2nd market (at least for now), that the demand for the Saint could possibly increase. Clubs/bots might make a run on the Saint if the 2nd market for the 1804 proves short-term profitable. Still a ways to go, but have to watch the spot price as well.

    Boom...we win.

  • NJCoin
    NJCoin Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Raufus said:

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    Because the original did not contain one ounce of gold. And because it was not high relief. 2009 was ultra high relief, which is why it is smaller.

  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @NJCoin said:

    @Raufus said:

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    Because the original did not contain one ounce of gold. And because it was not high relief. 2009 was ultra high relief, which is why it is smaller.

    I know. I'm just saying I believe they should have made it the same as the original same metal content same size. I think it would have been so much nicer.

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • NJCoin
    NJCoin Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Raufus said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @Raufus said:

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    Because the original did not contain one ounce of gold. And because it was not high relief. 2009 was ultra high relief, which is why it is smaller.

    I know. I'm just saying I believe they should have made it the same as the original same metal content same size. I think it would have been so much nicer.

    I guess you're entitled to your opinion. But these are meant to be semiquincentennial tributes, not 2026 restrikes.

  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 29, 2026 3:59PM
    Options

    @NJCoin said:

    @Raufus said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @Raufus said:

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    Because the original did not contain one ounce of gold. And because it was not high relief. 2009 was ultra high relief, which is why it is smaller.

    I know. I'm just saying I believe they should have made it the same as the original same metal content same size. I think it would have been so much nicer.

    I guess you're entitled to your opinion. But these are meant to be semiquincentennial tributes, not 2026 restrikes.

    Absolutely true. No question.

    I, personally, would have loved re-strikes. I remember when I first saw the 2009 UHR. I thought, "man, is that small!"

    I do love the UHR in the OGP. I also think it's the nicest OGP of modern times, possibly since the Pan-Pacs.

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • Mitchell
    Mitchell Posts: 595 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Agreed. Here is how a portion of my spreadsheet looks....only one more ✅ to go!

    I’d include the Flowing Hair to this list.

    Successful BST: dmwjr, ike126, bajjerfan, morganman94, sonoradesertrat, 12voltman, duiguy, gsaguy, gsa1fan, martin, coinfame, zas107, bothuwui, gerard, kccoin, jtwitten, robcool, coinscoins, mountain_goat, and a few more.
  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Mitchell said:

    Agreed. Here is how a portion of my spreadsheet looks....only one more ✅ to go!

    I’d include the Flowing Hair to this list.

    That would be a nice companion piece however my goal was to create a box of 20 semi-quincentennial issues and this works out perfectly. I could see swapping out the cent or Sacagawea for a flowing hair at some point though.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MrBear said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @Raufus said:

    @zeesh said:

    @bigmountainlion said:
    Is the dimension of this coin closer to 2009 ultra high relief or is it closer to 1907 high relief? I find the 2009 ultra high relief to be too small.

    2009 was 27mm and this one will be 30.61mm. Still smaller than the OG which was 34mm

    No idea why they don't make it the same as the original.

    Because the original did not contain one ounce of gold. And because it was not high relief. 2009 was ultra high relief, which is why it is smaller.

    The original had .97 oz of gold in it and a few grams of copper. Not enough to make a difference. The story at the time was that St. Gaudens designed it with an ultra-high relief strike in mind, but it was too difficult to do with 1907 technology. They made it smaller (piedfort?) so they could make the relief deeper. Personally, I would have rather they make a heavier coin with the same diameter of the original. But that's just me.

    Totally agree!

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • toranamira
    Options

    This whole BOM series has been such a disappointment, on multiple levels. But have to go for the Gaudens, unless they somehow jack up the premium significantly higher.

  • Rarity
    Rarity Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I love my 2009 UHR and probably skip this 250th Roman Numeral HR.

  • Sweetpie
    Sweetpie Posts: 562 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Is she smirking at us?

    @Rarity said:
    I love my 2009 UHR and probably skip this 250th Roman Numeral HR.

  • ProofCollection
    ProofCollection Posts: 8,056 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I am interested in buying just the medal if anyone wants to sell me theirs to reduce the cost of the gold coin.

    The fun thing for the gold collectors is that you have to get both Position A and Position B to have the complete set with that edge lettering.

  • toranamira
    toranamira Posts: 14 ✭✭
    edited September 5, 2026 12:05PM
    Options

    I really wish this release would be the same diameter as the original classic Gaudens double eagle, but sounds like it's a good bit smaller.

  • mbr33
    mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Next up on the product schedule is this one BOM 5. Not much left on the schedule now (excluding all the Superhero offerings.....I think it leaves 6 items with a little less than 4 months to go.)

  • ProofCollection
    ProofCollection Posts: 8,056 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    It's early but they loaded ATS 15,000.

  • mbr33
    mbr33 Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @ProofCollection said:
    It's early but they loaded ATS 15,000.

    @ProofCollection said:
    It's early but they loaded ATS 15,000.

    Late next week it will be reduced by whatever the ABPP will have offered to them. They started with 15,000 early on with BOM4, with several adjustments in the two weeks prior to drop.

  • Survivor50
    Survivor50 Posts: 219 ✭✭✭
    Options

    @mbr33 said:
    Next up on the product schedule is this one BOM 5. Not much left on the schedule now (excluding all the Superhero offerings.....I think it leaves 6 items with a little less than 4 months to go.)

    Maybe a late edition will pop up soon.

  • tahbb143
    tahbb143 Posts: 391 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @olympicsos said:
    I think there was a HUGE missed opportunity with the Best of the Mint series to not do a 1926 Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar. It's the most beautiful commemorative coin and the 100th anniversary of the series.

    Honestly the 1907 High Relief and Ultra High Relief, I am not against the mint doing restrikes of them in perpetuity and in other sizes like 1, 2 or 5 oz with the date 1907 like the perpetually dated 1780 Maria Theresa Thalers or presidential medals. They can even do medal turn to readily distinguish from the originals

    that would've been super cool

  • MsMorrisine
    MsMorrisine Posts: 40,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    oh. never thought of a commem. the OT would be great

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MsMorrisine said:
    oh. never thought of a commem. the OT would be great

    Agree!!

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!
  • 53BKid
    53BKid Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭
    Options

    @Raufus said:
    I'm leaning against 5. I'll take a look.

    I wish it and the UHR were essentially duplicates of the original

    If I ever just dump most all of my moderns, the one thing I'll buy coin wise is a nice actual HR.

    That, or an Octagon Pan-Pac!

    HAPPY COLLECTING!!!
  • Raufus
    Raufus Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I shoul> @53BKid said:

    @Raufus said:
    I'm leaning against 5. I'll take a look.

    I wish it and the UHR were essentially duplicates of the original

    If I ever just dump most all of my moderns, the one thing I'll buy coin wise is a nice actual HR.

    That, or an Octagon Pan-Pac!

    Would be awesome (but not at today's gold price)

    Land of the Free because of the Brave!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file