Options
Should a July 4th privy Quarter be added to a type set
WALLE
Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭
What is your thinking about the July 4th quarter being added to a type set collection, or just adding any or all of the 2026 quarters would be enough.
1
Comments
strictly speaking, i'd think it's a variety and not a real type
I would think that its part of a type set.
If you dont have it you will be missing a coin that was minted in 2026.
Be patient though. The price will come down.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS88
Could be either. If you treat it like a mint mark, which privy marks are similar to, it's really more of a variety. If you consider it a design element, it's a type.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Call it an 09-S VDB and your set is complete.
That would make it part of the year set. I think it's more ambiguous whether it represents a distinct type. There is a non-privy quarter, so you wouldn't be missing a 2026 quarter.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Only if the individual collector chooses to . But only 250,000 of those will have one. How many holes in an album or folder will remain empty forever ?
https://acoinshop.com/ —-> https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
In my opinion, no.
Lol. Or replace it with a Sunoco token
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Then you'd have a complete set of Shell tokens.
What is your take on the State quarter series and all the other series that came after them? Should they all be included in type sets? If not, then you have your answer. If so, you might still have questions.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
For a type set, it should be considered the same type as the other quarters issued this year, all of which would be confined to a single spot in that set.
Now for a year, mint, and "finish" set, it's an absolute must.
Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.
I’m not planning to include it as the motivation behind it bothers me - it’s more gimmick than design element. Once it’s cheap enough I may weaken tho. We’ll see.
I think that's an interesting question. I think it is easier to consider the state quarters as different types than the privy. After all, they each have a different design. Yet, a 21st century type set would likely only include one of each series.
All commemorative halves are considered to be a single type in type sets.
Regardless, a privy is even a less dramatic difference.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Aren't the State Quarters, America The Beautiful Quarters, American Women Quarters, Presidential Dollars, Innovation Dollars all gimmicks?
I'm going to add it to my 250th anniversary album (I'm still working on it) being i think it fits better there.
No
Is your position that no quarters have been issued in 27 years?
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Limiting production is a major clue.
I wouldn't add it as a required coin, but I am personally adding one
Successful Transactions With: JWP, DBSTrader2, greencopper, bretsan, ajaan, Ted1
I'm looking for one with a hole in it for my type set.