Options
Net grade or details grade on this High Relief Saint?
dval2929
Posts: 7 ✭
I am trying to get some opinions on my NGC 62 high relief Saint.
My core question: Would PCGS or CACG straight grade this coin today (even at a lower grade) or would this go right into a bb?
I’ve been gathering opinions lately, and would love yours as well. I’ll include many photos as well as close ups of the offending area.
Thank you!
85fcvohhjrrg.jpeg "")
0
Comments
Details not body bag.
I don't think it will turn out differently than the first time.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Thank you, but the first time it was straight graded as an NGC 62, so I don’t quite understand
Two different points:
1. It wouldn't body bag. They don't do that for graffiti.
2. I don't see why wouldn't it straight grade again.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
EDITED:
Wait,
Is the coin not now in an NGC 62 holder?
30+ years coin shop experience (ret.) Coins, bullion, currency, scrap & interesting folks. Loved every minute!
i'm in the details camp
Got it, thanks
Yep, it is. And I am wondering if CACG/PCGS would cross it at any grade or details-only
There’s no harm in trying (aside from the expenses) as long as you submit as a cross at a minimum straight grade only. It might cross with PCGS but I wouldn’t hold my breath with CACG.
Yes, submit to PCGS under Crossover at MS62 minimum. That way you get the coin back still in the NGC holder if it fails.
30+ years coin shop experience (ret.) Coins, bullion, currency, scrap & interesting folks. Loved every minute!
I don't think those two marks alone would cause it to body bag. That's what MS 61-62 are for. The issues it may have include a light wiping that gives it an uncomfortable sheen that I don't see on other 61-62 CAC HR Saints. May just be the picture. The other thing I can't tell is if there's any tooling in the fields elsewhere that might get it a details grade.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Thank you. I’m pretty new to collecting and it’s wild how this coin looks different under different light. Here is the reverse under more subdued light:
The only sheen that looks off to me is the “cloud” that is sort of in her immediate background behind her shoulders and neck. It’s visible in pic #3.
But as is obvious I don’t have a great feel for all this yet. Happy to take close ups of the possible wipe spot if that helps! Thank you!
Don't mean this to be overly harsh but just as realistic as I can. I think the coin would likely grade at PCGS and possibly but less likely at CACG. The staple scratches bother me less than the overall color/texture of the surfaces. Additionally, there appears to be fairly noticeable wear/cabinet friction on the obverse.
Netted down to AU55 (from AU58) due to the scratches and not great surfaces IMO.
By all means try to cross it over if you want, worst it can cost you is a couple hundred dollars in grading fees, but I would not advise cracking it out.
My old 58 if that helps to have something to look at different features of condition:
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
those are some long scratches
No apology needed! I asked for feedback. That's a mighty nice 58 you have there.
I hear you with color and wear, but one thing I've realized in my short time owning this thing is that it's hard to pin down true color in photos, and likewise with the wear. Sometimes it look like a big, black dead spot but then if I change shirts or rotate the coin, it looks totally different. So I'm not saying you are wrong at all, but I also don't trust these iPhone shots where various colors are reflecting!
I would leave it in the NGC 62 holder.
Possible sell it in auction then buy a nice 63 or 64. PCGS or CACG.
I read that they essentially do not give 60s at all. Like this CACG population report says they have assigned 3 grades of 60 out of 2,800+ Saints!
Not a details coin. Recent scratches worse than the ones you posted could lead to a "details" coin.
I think that it would probably grade at PCGS. I would doubt it at CACG.
Here's a 1938-S Jeff I purchased recently. I had to get pass a rather large mark on the lower coat on Jefferson. While the strike looks full, there are some minor weak areas at the top of Jeff's hair. And as you can see, the luster and toning are phenomenal, almost proof-like. And the steps all 5.25 of them were not called by ANACS but they are there, no marks, bridges whatsoever. So, for the number of highlights, the MS65 coin has given me many reasons to look pass that mark on the coat.
But gold is soft, why would they take those marks serious and give a details grade for the coin? I've had zero success crossing coins unless I cracked them.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
High relief Saints are treated differently than almost all other coins, and problems that will (almost) always earn a "details" grade for any other issue frequently go into straight-grade holders, with an appropriate silent-net grade.
Official PCGS account of:
www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com