Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

The merits of collecting low-grade vs high grade

renomedphysrenomedphys Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 21, 2026 6:24PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I mean sure, I've always been attracted to the meatiness of a high grade specimen, but there is a lot to be said for particularly nice low-grade examples. I recently picked up a Fine-15 Head of '93 (S20-b) cent that's got great color and hardly any marks, just nice even wear, and is even beautiful in its own right. And along the same vein, I bought a VG-8 1812 Large Date cent that again was well-centered, had nice color, excellent appearance, and hardly any "marks". Just nice even wear. There is definitely something unusual and "sweet" about coins like these. And not to mention, they are far more affordable than their often over-processed high-grade bretheren. I mean, they may actually cost quite a lot more than a typical example in that grade, but I'd almost rather pay $3000 for an extremely nice $1500 "book value" coin than the regular price for a questionable Unc

I've given some thought to completing a date set of Sheldon cents. I mean, I'm only missing the '99 through the 1807. Maybe this is the way to go with these. I know I'm probably asking a lot (I usually am) but at least I won't have to sell 1000 shares of APPL for a nice 1799. Right?

Comments

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,824 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 22, 2026 5:18PM

    If high grade is not affordable lower grade should do.

    Ronnie can’t afford a certain slab coin in ms67 which is $620 but he could afford a MS64 example of this date for $259.

    Investor
  • Options
    CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 10,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 21, 2026 6:59PM

    I too find some lower grade coins to be attractive and collectable but at the end of the day I like the jaw droppers more.

  • Options
    ColonialcoinColonialcoin Posts: 891 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @renomedphys said:
    I mean sure, I've always been attracted to the meatiness of a high grade specimen, but there is a lot to be said for particularly nice low-grade examples. I recently picked up a Fine-15 Head of '93 (S20-b) cent that's got great color and hardly any marks, just nice even wear, and is even beautiful in its own right. And along the same vein, I bought a VG-8 1812 Large Date cent that again was well-centered, had nice color, excellent appearance, and hardly any "marks". Just nice even wear. There is definitely something unusual and "sweet" about coins like these. And not to mention, they are far more affordable than their often over-processed high-grade bretheren. I mean, they may actually cost quite a lot more than a typical example in that grade, but I'd almost rather pay $3000 for an extremely nice $1500 "book value" coin than the regular price for a questionable Unc

    I've given some thought to completing a date set of Sheldon cents. I mean, I'm only missing the '99 through the 1807. Maybe this is the way to go with these. I know I'm probably asking a lot (I usually am) but at least I won't have to sell 1000 shares of APPL for a nice 1799. Right?

    S-20b is my favorite large cent variety because of the placement of the date. Congrats on owning what sounds like a very pleasing coin.

  • Options
    ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,372 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sounds like EAC thinking. :)

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cougar1978 said:
    If high grade is not affordable lower grade should do.

    Ronnie can’t afford a certain slab coin in ms67 which is $620 but he can afford a MS64 example of this date for $259.

    Not what the OP was stating. He was speaking of mid-grade worn/circulated coins that are attractive and problem-free VS ultra Gems.
    What he wasn't doing was comparing MS64s to MS67s and the cost between them.

  • Options
    renomedphysrenomedphys Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Colonialcoin said:
    S-20b is my favorite large cent variety because of the placement of the date. Congrats on owning what sounds like a very pleasing coin.

    I feel the same way! The flat date is so unique in the series

  • Options
    DesertCoinDesertCoin Posts: 427 ✭✭✭

    Taking it step further to lowball collecting, I think moderns (and only moderns) should be collected in the lowest grade possible.

    “Land of the free because of the brave”
    “Saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone”
    In Deo solo confidimus
    ΙΧΘΥΣ
    ΙϹ ΧϹ ΝΙΚΑ (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ ΝΙΚΑ)


    Member since 2026
    Successful BST transactions with: Ted 1, JWP, bigjpst, Vetter, nickelsciolist, ajaan,
  • Options
    Old_CollectorOld_Collector Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinscratch said:
    I too find some lower grade coins to be attractive and collectable but at the end of the day I like the jaw droppers more.

    That would be nice if I had, oh say, Del Hansen's bank account. ;)

  • Options
    DDRDDR Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Agree 100% with @lermish. I am attracted to the history that comes with a nicely circulated old coin.

  • Options
    coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I also enjoy a well-circulated crusty coin look, as long as not dipped. Nothing is worse then a 100+ year old white coin in low grades.
    When I started collecting Morgans I started both a slabbed, mostly MS set (excluding several key dates) and a raw XF and lower graded set in a LOC album. I really enjoyed the look and history of these circulated coins. Most of the time I looked at the circulated set, more then the MS set, and enjoyed removing coins from the album and holding in my hand. Below was a set of my S mint coins.


  • Options
    CoinPhysicistCoinPhysicist Posts: 629 ✭✭✭✭

    Have to make compromises when you have a budget. I’d much rather have a nice $350 1921 Walking Liberty Half dollar than a nice $350 1944 Walking Liberty.

    Successful transactions with: wondercoin, Tetromibi, PerryHall, PlatinumDuck, JohnMaben/Pegasus Coin & Jewelry, CoinFlip, coinlieutenant, bigjpst, and joebb21.

  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I try to collect only MS coins but a charming, high-end AU or XF is always welcome in my sets. And the pops are often lower than the MS examples for the rarer issues.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Options
    john_nyc1john_nyc1 Posts: 225 ✭✭✭

    I mostly collect MS where I can afford but agree sometimes an old coin in say VG-F-VF that has really “earned” its genuine wear and age can be just as neat & beautiful.

    Casual collector: Morgans & Peace Dollars & 20th Century Type Set. Successful BST transactions with ProofCollection, Morgan13, CoinFinder, CoinHunter4, Bretsan.

  • Options
    CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 10,952 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Old_Collector said:

    @Coinscratch said:
    I too find some lower grade coins to be attractive and collectable but at the end of the day I like the jaw droppers more.

    That would be nice if I had, oh say, Del Hansen's bank account. ;)

    Yeah, isn't that something to ponder. Get your money for nothing and your chicks for free :D

  • Options
    WildWestHalfDollarsWildWestHalfDollars Posts: 7,030 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I prefer the look of lower circulated grades. Even if I was richer that would not change that is just what I like. G-04 to F-12 and may up to VF-20 if I cannot find a lower grade with nice eye appeal.

    Liberty Seated Half Dollars

  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,830 ✭✭✭✭✭

    When I put together a date set of cents from 1793 to date, the grades range from VG-10 PR or MS-66. There are very few 66s. I could have collected all but couple dates from 1816 to 1857 in Mint State, but I didn’t. I just didn’t want to spend that much money. A no problem VF, wth hard, smooth surfaces was just as good for the money.

    I had a number Mint State Flying Eagle an Indian cents, but aimed to finish the set in raw EF and AU in an album. It felt good to fill well over half the album for about $2,000.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    TennesseeDaveTennesseeDave Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    When I was actively collecting Trade $'s, I usually tried to get the best XF-AU coins I could find. I have a couple VF's that fit the bill as well.

    Trade $'s
  • Options
    OwenSeymourOwenSeymour Posts: 19 ✭✭✭

    I love well circulated coins! VG/F is generally a little more worn than I like, however a superb VF or XF type coin will often bring me more dopamine than a bleh UNC :smile:

    Head coin nerd @ Rarity7

  • Options
    ColoradoCoinGuyColoradoCoinGuy Posts: 259 ✭✭✭

    In many of the sets I try to assemble I try to find nice XF to AU examples. More affordable but tougher to find than what the price guides indicate they should be.

    Member of LSCC, EAC, Fly-In Club, BCCS
    Life member of ANA
  • Options
    lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 9,380 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wasn't nearly as "invested" in this little side-venture doing Buffalo Nickels in mostly VF...

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1114715/completed-wayte-raymond-album-of-buffalo-nickels-pics-added#pagetop


    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,712 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like wholesome circulated coins and am sometimes tempted to keep them. But unless extremely rare, I usually decide against it. First, because the ROI usually sucks. (Doesn’t mean ROI is my primary focus, but it does matter.) And second, I know I’ll probably buy a better one when the opportunity presents itself, so why bother?

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 9,380 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think it really comes down to what gives you enjoyment from the hobby.

    For me, I'm much more interested in building a collection than waiting decades for "the perfect coin." I have a career outside of numismatics that pays the bills and allows me to buy coins when I can. If I held out for the absolute best example of every date, I'd own far fewer coins and would probably never complete many of the sets that interest me... especially in Early Copper.

    ROI isn't irrelevant, but it's never been my primary motivation. I buy coins because I enjoy studying them, comparing die varieties, and appreciating the history they represent. A wholesome, evenly worn coin that has survived 200+ years with honest circulation can be just as appealing to me as a Mint State example. Could I sell my entire copper collection and buy one spectacular 1793 cent? Probably. But then I'd have one coin instead of a collection, and for me the enjoyment comes from seeing the progression of dates, varieties, and history laid out together. There's also something wonderfully democratic about circulated early copper. These coins did what they were made to do. They passed through thousands of hands, bought bread, paid wages, and witnessed the first decades of the Republic. Honest wear isn't a defect to me... it's part of the coin's biography.

    Everyone has different priorities. Some collectors pursue the finest known examples. Others enjoy completing sets within a realistic budget. Neither approach is "right"... they're just different ways to enjoy the hobby.

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Options
    TimNHTimNH Posts: 270 ✭✭✭✭

    Wish this had been a poll, I'd like to see the breakdown. My favorites tend to be in the 25-40 range, and I have no problem going down to G if the pricing demands it, as I did for my Chain Cent.

    An old classic MS coin is similarly sad as a 1960s Ferrari with 12 miles.

  • Options
    BikergeekBikergeek Posts: 690 ✭✭✭✭✭

    For my Capped Bust half dime set, I aimed for AU to Gem grades. Now that I'm doing Capped Bust dimes, I realized that I'd have to accommodate some scarcity and higher prices, so I aim for XF45 through MS62+. (Some of the tuffies will be below 45, and I may find a "must-have" or two above 62). Here's the 1833 JR-5 in CACG 45. This isn't a tuffie, and I could have held out for a higher grade for this marriage. But I thought this coin was just lovely (and still do) and it makes me smile. Quality is found at all levels, and there's peace in being happy with something and not needing to strive for MORE.

    My hobby website Groovycoins.com, new and improved!

  • Options
    MikeDMikeD Posts: 44 ✭✭✭

    I think it also depends on the series. You don't often see a circulated St. Gaudens. Especially when the cost is just the gold value for a common date, choosing between a 63 or 64 and a 06, the the 06 is more fun to me.

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Return On Investment always has been and always will be enjoyment and relaxation along with inquisitive study.
    Let other aspects in life focus on the financial ROI.

  • Options
    zer0manzer0man Posts: 81 ✭✭✭

    There are beautiful coins in all grades. Collect what you like.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file