Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Buffalo Nickel with lamination loss of value

VetterVetter Posts: 981 ✭✭✭✭✭

I have this semi key date 1924 S Buffalo graded by ANACS as XF45 Lamination. It’s a very good strike for the date with a not often seen full horn. Unfortunately there is the “problem” on the obv.
Just wondering how much it takes away from the value?
Thanks for any opinions.

Members I have done business with:
Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.

Comments

  • Options
    GreenstangGreenstang Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26, 2026 3:50PM

    It depends. A lamination is considered a planchet error and might be desirable to an error collector.
    On the other hand someone who likes their coins unmarked would not be attracted to it.
    Personally I think it would add some value to it as it is an error although minor.

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,603 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see it as a slight distraction and would imagine a small discount from a normal XF45 to come into play.

  • Options
    124Spider124Spider Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26, 2026 8:17PM

    I would not buy it, but I generally don't buy error coins.

    As an example--I collect buffalo nickels; I have a PCGS XF40, problem free, copy of this coin. I would much rather have a problem-free XF40 than a lamination-error XF45.

    I suspect that someone who likes that sort of thing would pay a bit more for it that a "normal" example, but that people who don't collect them would not buy it.

  • Options
    cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,045 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26, 2026 7:41PM

    This is like getting a super-common VAM attribution on a common Morgan, or any VAM attribution on a rare one. By putting the variety or error on the holder, you immediately go from a large market (Morgan dollar collectors) to a much smaller one (VAM collectors). Obviously, it works out if the variety or error is rare or desirable, but most of the time it has a negative impact on value.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Vetter It had been my experience that in the 5 or 6 years that coins similar to this sell at par to Greysheet.

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,899 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ouch!

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file