Home U.S. Coin Forum

Your thoughts on this Proof Walker - New photos added.

SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 5, 2026 11:02PM in U.S. Coin Forum


Comments

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,516 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fuzzy images of a non-cameo example.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Decent. Looks like it would be a pleasant addition.
    As stated though, a better understanding of the photographer's intentions is unknown, although suspected.

  • MarkInDavisMarkInDavis Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭✭

    Pictures out of focus. No obvious hairlines. Might be some removable haze (or that could be the focus). No cameo, but maybe some decent contrast. Kind of speculating with those photos.

    image Respectfully, Mark
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The photos are cell phone photos taken quickly. I will try to get better pictures and post them later tonight.

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    The photos are cell phone photos taken quickly. I will try to get better pictures and post them later tonight.

    My apology. I was unaware you were the photographer.
    In that case, you owning it adds a possible few points to the overall grade, in my opinion.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 404 ✭✭✭✭

    Blurry photos but from what I can see, that walker looks really nice! 🙂

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,363 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Almost has a stripped look to it. The spot on the obverse breastplate is concerning.

  • VeepVeep Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭✭

    The last pics nailed it at its best. It’s not that close to cameo, but it looks pretty.

    "Let me tell ya Bud, you can buy junk anytime!"
  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,033 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PF66.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 4,045 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Too white.

  • The_Dinosaur_ManThe_Dinosaur_Man Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's a great piece

    Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
    Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
    https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.

  • humanssuckhumanssuck Posts: 663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin, I like it.

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,075 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice. High end 66.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,735 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JimTyler said:
    Too white.

    Yes, this comment sounds odd, but if you collect the 1936 to 1942 Proof coins, you come to appreciate the original coins which have not been dipped. It can be an acquired taste, and it’s not like “monster toning,” but the originality can be desirable. I’ll post photos later.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • shishshish Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice example, PF-66.

    Liberty Seated and Trade Dollar Specialist
  • NotSureNotSure Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭

    Wow, that was worth the wait for better pics, that's really a sweet looking coin. Wouldn't have guessed the first set of pics were of THAT beauty! That is a really, really nice example!!

    I'll come up with something.
  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 4,045 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:

    @JimTyler said:
    Too white.

    Yes, this comment sounds odd, but if you collect the 1936 to 1942 Proof coins, you come to appreciate the original coins which have not been dipped. It can be an acquired taste, and it’s not like “monster toning,” but the originality can be desirable. I’ll post photos later.

    84 year old silver doesn’t stay that white unless it was a CC $ hoard coin stuck in the middle of the bag. This coin was in something and not an inert PCGS plastic. It should have some evidence of some degree of patina. It may be odd but I would say dipped ( not necessarily detrimental) but too white for me to believe 100% original. I could be wrong… thought I was once… but I was wrong 😁

  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 4,045 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just noticed some area on the rim that looks like patina but that could have been where the dipper was holding the coin, been there done that.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,242 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely looks cleaned and/or wiped down at some point but still a nice piece. I think it would straight grade.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 7, 2026 12:28PM

    @JimTyler said:

    @BillJones said:

    @JimTyler said:
    Too white.

    Yes, this comment sounds odd, but if you collect the 1936 to 1942 Proof coins, you come to appreciate the original coins which have not been dipped. It can be an acquired taste, and it’s not like “monster toning,” but the originality can be desirable. I’ll post photos later.

    84 year old silver doesn’t stay that white unless it was a CC $ hoard coin stuck in the middle of the bag. This coin was in something and not an inert PCGS plastic. It should have some evidence of some degree of patina. It may be odd but I would say dipped ( not necessarily detrimental) but too white for me to believe 100% original. I could be wrong… thought I was once… but I was wrong 😁

    Most newbies will not like this one, but this is the look I tend to like. That does not mean that all of the Proof coins I have from the 1936 to 1942 sets look like this. I way over paid for this one years ago. We all make mistakes. NGC graded this PR-67.

    This one is a bit for fugly. I believe this toning comes from storing the coin in the cellophane sleves the mint used for the coins back in the day.

    And yes, this has been dipped. Contray to some opinions, dipped is not cleaned, and it does not kill the coin. It's just the attractive original is preferred. Sometimes you have have to dip a coin to sell it. "Original" is not always "attractive."

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The pictured half dollar, IMO, was dipped in the past. It has started to develop very light toning along/adjacent to the rim.

    For those who like white silver proofs , with contrast between the fields and devices this half dollar checks all the boxes.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,406 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Its a nice looking WLH.
    I would be happy to own it.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP

  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 4,045 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Like it or not this one (picture from above) looks original. I like it but don’t buy this type of coin.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file