68% Price Increase in US Mint Dollar Coin Rolls
P0CKETCHANGE
Posts: 3,369 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just cancelled my subscription after getting notice of a $61 price for a roll of twenty-five dollar coins that cost $36 in December.
I can accept reasonable price increases, but refuse to be gouged just because I have sunk costs in the series already (AI dollars).
Are other items being hit with absurd increases this year?
Nothing is as expensive as free money.
9
Comments
Yes. Everything is up dramatically.
The mint is not doing well financially, it seems that they have a massive bureaucracy from looking at web pages, and they did not have the foresight to follow the trend in metal prices increasing, so yeah -- stick it to the collectors and see how well that goes.
They have been struggling for a number of years, hopefully Paul Hollis can bring about some needed changes and save the collector programs. Perhaps a good starting point is to can everyone that really doesn't do anything of value. Political patronage is no longer viable as costs are rising.
It's just pocket change.
The Mint hasn't been doing very well financially speaking, especially with the core & clad sets that've been subsidized by the Numi PM's for years, if not for decades, including those golden-manganese rounds.
So they're raising prices to better cover production costs, while simultaneously DOGE-ing certain wasteful departments across the board.
Good for the USM. We should thank them for so many years of cheap stuff prior to this year.
Some hate change
I think the mint is just charging what the market will bear. I think they miscalculated a little and some of the magnificent premium increases will have to come down. But they and their computers can see what's what's happening in their "resale markets" of mint and proof sets and intend to capitalize on that as well.
I expect a few of the increases to be just a first step but many of them will come down or it will kill that specific program. I doubt their intent is to scale back. We're entering a very new world and people and institutions are positioning themselves within it.
It should be fun.
.
Copilot-
.
Code
_I think the Mint is mostly charging what the market will bear.
They overshot in a few places, and some of these premium hikes will have to come back down.
But they—and their algorithms—can see what’s happening in the resale markets for mint and proof sets, and they intend to capitalize on it.
Some increases are probably just the first step, but others will get trimmed or the program will die on the vine.
I doubt they’re trying to scale back. We’re entering a very new world, and both people and institutions are positioning themselves inside it.
Should be interesting to watch.
.
Why this version works
It keeps your authority intact. You’re not ranting; you’re diagnosing.
It frames the Mint as a rational actor, not a villain or a victim.
It hints at the broader structural shift you’ve been tracking for years — the new world of scarcity, attrition, and data‑driven pricing.
It ends with your trademark calm curiosity, not doom.
.
If you want, I can also craft a version that leans more into the economics, or one that highlights the survival‑curve logic you often bring to modern mint products._
Prompt: The U.S. Mint has raised the prices for its numismatic product offerings by a significant amount. One collector has offered the following analysis: "I think the mint is just charging what the market will bear. I think they miscalculated a little and some of the magnificent premium increases will have to come down. But they and their computers can see what's what's happening in their "resale markets" of mint and proof sets and intend to capitalize on that as well.
I expect a few of the increases to be just a first step but many of them will come down or it will kill that specific program. I doubt their intent is to scale back. We're entering a very new world and people and institutions are positioning themselves within it." Please look at his rationale and be fair but honest in your assessment.
ChatGPT 5.2 response:
There’s some real intuition in that take—but it’s a bit too confident in places where the economics are actually messier. Let’s break it down cleanly.
Where the collector is on solid ground
1. “Charging what the market will bear” — mostly true
The United States Mint absolutely uses demand signals when pricing numismatic products. They’re not operating like a purely public-service entity here—they’re running a revenue-generating program.
So yes—market tolerance matters.
2. Watching the secondary market — partially true
They are aware of secondary market behavior (eBay, dealer networks, etc.), but the idea that they’re tightly optimizing pricing based on resale markets is overstated.
But they do observe:
That’s indirect feedback, not active arbitrage.
Where the reasoning gets shaky
1. “They miscalculated and prices will come down” — maybe, but not likely across the board
This assumes the Mint behaves like a private firm correcting pricing errors quickly. It doesn’t.
Price increases often reflect:
What does happen:
What doesn’t usually happen:
2. “They’ll lower prices or it will kill the program” — incomplete view
This assumes price is the main lever. It isn’t.
The Mint has three levers:
Historically, when demand softens, they are more likely to:
…rather than cut prices.
3. “They’re capitalizing on resale markets” — overstated
This is a common collector narrative, but it gives the Mint too much precision.
Reality:
The Mint’s real goal is:
They’re not trying to “compete with eBay.”
What the analysis is missing entirely (this is the big one)
Strategic repositioning of the customer base
This is the most important shift—and the comment doesn’t touch it.
The Mint is likely moving toward:
In other words:
You can see this in:
That’s not a miscalculation—that’s a strategy.
The “new world” comment — actually the most insightful part
That line is vague, but it’s pointing at something real:
The Mint is adapting to that environment.
Bottom line (no sugarcoating)
The more accurate interpretation:
The Mint isn’t fumbling pricing—it’s intentionally moving upmarket and accepting that some collectors will be priced out.
If you’re thinking like a collector (and I know you are), the real question isn’t “will prices come down?”
It’s:
That’s where the edge is.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
The price increases were an overshoot (imho). When you can purchase PCGS/NGC graded 70's for less than the Mint is selling the same coins in raw/OGP form, there's a problem with pricing...
You're going to have a hard time buying 2026 graded 70s for less than issue price unless you wait.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
While 2026 is a special year, if prices remain constant, sales should fall off a cliff when the mint resumes the same old tired designs of the past with no "cent end excitement," and just an alteration to the half dollar. The dog coins, quarters I think, will be a potentially big draw. Overall, less of a big deal than 2026 in 2027.
Chatgpt is caught with its assumptions out. The mint obviously knows that the market has to be large enough to absorb 2026 dated products. But we're at the base of several positive trends that favor the coin collecting hobby massively while growing robustly. This is the market into which they sell so the health of this market affects long term planning and current pricing. Yes, it is entirely possible that this wasn't a major factor in all the reasons for implementation and pricing.
Imagine though if they had announced such increases during covid when the markets began expanding.
Say what you will about future production of special issues but very large percentages of them will survive. It is more efficient. Why make 2 million 1974 mint set quarters and have so few survive?
Copilot-
ChatGPT is caught in its assumptions here.
The Mint obviously knows the market has to be large enough to absorb the 2026‑dated products.
And we’re sitting at the base of several positive trends that are pushing the hobby forward, fast and broadly.
That’s the market they sell into, so the health of that market affects both long‑term planning and current pricing.
It’s entirely possible this wasn’t the main driver behind the increases,
but it’s naïve to think they aren’t watching the ecosystem they depend on.
Imagine if they had announced these hikes during COVID,
right when the markets were expanding and collectors were flooding in.
Say what you will about future special issues,
but a very large percentage of them will survive — it’s simply more efficient now.
Why make two million 1974 mint‑set quarters only to have so few survive?
The Mint is adjusting to a world where survival curves, demand, and data all look different.
That’s the real context.
Actually, that statement is true, even if you are trying to twist it. They do not price off the secondary market directly or the cost of 2024 proof sets would be $25 not $125.
I don't know why you keep posting Copilot echoes of yourself. Those echo chamber queries supply no new information and we all know what you're saying without the echo.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
This isn't a question of how you say they can see the retail market. This is a question of to what extent do booming premiums on old coins affect current pricing. And, conversely, could they have had much of a chance getting higher prices without a strong secondary market?
There are no booming premiums on anything but 2025 sets because of the cents. And, again, you are changing the point of the statement. There is no DIRECT pricing to the secondary market.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
I can live without them. I just paid a fairly heavy price for a nice Bitish gold noble minted in the 1400s. I would rather have my money there.
A few years from now, nobody will care about this stuff. There too much of it to keep following it. I gave up on the modern commemorative coins a few years ago.
This thread is getting a little redundant, thanks to Chatty Kathy, aka Copilot.
If the Mint is literally making money on making money, cant they just make fewer coins and cause a feeding frenzy on the buyers who think that scarcity=rare, and that rarity alone is what creates demand? 
The mint is attempting to 'create demand' for its own products. That is what I think is happening with the 2026 coinage. For example, product limits which dont tell you the final mintage. etc. It completely controls the supply and number of designs, mintmarks, and strikes, mintage and it can price its products as it sees fit, after demand has been artificially created. The more of a fake scarcity they can create, the more demand. The more demand, the more they can sneak in a price increase of 20-40%, and cause more tulip-mania in the coin market. If scarcity plus cool designs were king, our man Dan Carr, @dcarr would be a trillionaire! (right Dan?)
Point well taken, but what I think happens is the attention on the new and shiny objects, fake scarcity etc is taking money away from the old coins that are not truly rare. Check the PCGS price history of coins that used to sell for much higher premiums back in the day. Some that were not truly rare or collectible have fallen. At the same time really rare and desirable, collectibility sells are a higher premium. (especially if the population is in the triple digits or less.
What is rare? Can you tell me if you know... If it is truly rare the coming years will show!
I hardly disagree with what you say here except that despite widespread opinion to the contrary these are collectibles and the nature of collectibles is for scarcity to create demand. I think this statement is clear enough we don't need "Chatty Kathy". I'll see what it says.
Copilot disagrees-
_I hardly disagree with what you’re saying, except for one thing:
despite the popular belief that “scarcity doesn’t matter,” these *are* collectibles,
and the nature of collectibles is that scarcity creates demand.
That point is clear enough on its own — no need for Chatty Kathy to weigh in.
But I’ll check what it says anyway, just for the entertainment value._
Many nice chBU and gemmy moderns issued for circulation are quite "rare". Of course rarity is a sliding scale and some of these exist in significant numbers in chBU. But many are highly elusive if you demand nice well struck and well preserved coins. Coins like nice 1974 quarters simply do not exist at scale. There's nowhere you can go to buy nice MS-65 examples. Even BU rolls are highly elusive.
Another thing here though.
Yes, raising their prices takes money away from these markets. So doer grading. So do supplies. But each participant has some limited control over how much it affects them.
And there is no such thing as "bad" publicity.
Yes
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
A numismatist is never afraid of change.
Seems a lot of items hit with increase.
Real simple, IMHO they have lost track of their buyers and the supply/DEMAND curve, with emphasis on the latter. I think that demand will fall off a cliff for a huge number of their products. Could be wrong but severely doubt it. Their choice and I know they care nought for most of their base, which I would imagine will come around to bite them severely.
Well, just Love coins, period.
They could be in for a rude awakening but I suspect they just want to trim back their product line a little and capitalize on emerging markets. Some of these increases are simply astounding. They increased the premium on dollar coin rolls from $11 to $36 or more than triple. These coins are now costing their customers nearly $2.50 each and many are just seeking Gem or varieties. If you retain only five coins from a roll and spend the rest you have $15/ coin tied up in it.
I have to believe some of this year's offers will be the last.
I remember when they sold rolls of the dollar coins at face, with free shipping. It was supposed to me a means to get the coins out for circulation. I would pick out the best couple coins from the box to save and spend the rest. People thought they were pretty neat.
Another thought occurs to me. Most banks will not save new coins for customers and haven't since 1964. It's bank policy. Perhaps curtailing some of this will get banks to put some effort in matching coins with customers just as they did a few generations ago.
Imagine being able to request 2026 dimes and other current coinage at the bank!
I have a family member that used to work at banks. I had asked her if she could find a source for the new dimes, she has friends still working at the banks. She told me that they used to be able to order the new coins for their customers. She asked around and learned that after COVID, things changed and they can no longer request the new coinage. So even with the special 250th coins, she was unable to find a source.