Strike doubling on the edge lettering of a coin?
sellitstore
Posts: 3,067 ✭✭✭✭✭
We understand how strike doubling can happen from a single blow from the dies but how does strike doubling happen when the design isn't impressed by a single sharp blow, where the die may bounce and leave a second impression. How does this happen when the design is being rolled onto the edge, under pressure, for a short period of time? Do we know or can we speculate?
Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
0
Comments
There we go.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
Now you're going to confuse him again. Lol
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
This is a good point.
Einstein’s view of God was non-traditional and pantheistic, focusing on the harmony, order, and intelligibility of the cosmos rather than a personal deity. His quotes reveal a profound respect for the universe’s mysteries, a belief in rational laws, and a moral philosophy grounded in compassion and understanding, bridging science and spirituality.
“My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.”
Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)
What is a good point? The basic premise - that edge lettering strike doubling exists - seems to be faulty.
Edge lettering can be partial if the coin gets stuck in the castaing machine and skips some of the process (expect to see a messy depression in the edge where the bar with the lettering ground against the coin), it can be added twice if the coin goes through the machine a second time (the second set of lettering can be upside down or not), or it can be missing altogether.
The above scenarios apply to business strikes, not proofs, which use a collar with the lettering on it.
Why can't it hop a little while going through the edge lettering machine?
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Partial/skipped lettering as mentioned above.
They are under great pressure when rolled between the lettered and blank bar.
I don't see any "strike doubling" being possible. Would love to see photos if anyone thinks they've seen it.
I still don't see why a tiny hop or slip couldn't cause local SD. It wouldn't be on the whole legend, obviously.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
You can also have "slide doubling." A form of strike doubling that is smooth rather than step-like. Not able to find a good pic so I am proxying with this mint mark [circled vertical] which may or may not qualify as slide doubling.
I don't see any chance for a "hop" and a "slip" where the lettered bar drags across the coin (or the coin drags across the bar) would not result in a doubled letter.
But billions of edge-lettered dollar coins have been struck so if MD/SD coins exist then let's see them.
There's one on the other thread that looks like MD/SD
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Not to me. It appears to me to just be very deeply struck.
Besides, there would need to be an informed explanation as to how it happened within the minting process, as is the case with all alleged errors.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
On my screen I am seeing extremely deep (and therefore wide) lettering, plus a gouge to the left of one of Rs.
This article has good photos of various edge-lettering errors.
I don't see anything I'd call MD/SD. One of the improperly spaced errors shows "dragged" letters.
https://minterrornews.com/features-7-31-07-george_washington_dollars.html
I think "dragged" letters would be the equivalent.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
To the OP ... are speculating for new coins, like the Washington Dollars being discussed in this and other threads recently, or are we talking about edge lettering imparted with a Castaing Machine?
These are entirely different methods, and done at a different sequence in the coining process (and for somewhat different reasons).
For Washington Dollars, maybe we should ask @MWallace to join the discussion. I think he has done quite a lot of research on the subject.
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
Unfortunately I don't have anything that I can add.
strike doubling or mechanical doubling occurs when there's slop in the machines workings.
it is possible for a coin to slide around in a castaing machine. the lettering gets smeared like peanut butter. i have one like it. i sent i in under the error level ond only got a graded coin back. i'd show a picture but i'm too lazy to get the dollar plus it's in a pronged holder that still shows too little of the problems. you can tell it slid against the lettering and stars, plus there is a wide blank spot where lettering would be. there is obvious signs of metal movement
To me, that's an error. Missing letters.
I had photos of bust half edge lettering shelf-doubling that I deleted last night. It was an interesting phenomenon that I posted about on a forum, but am unable to find the thread discussion. The edge lettering was complete, but showed a machine doubling effect on the letters, not strike doubled.
If this topic is serious, which it isn't looking like it, I can pull out coins and retake photos of the edges of my bust halves.
"But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
BHNC #AN-10
JRCS #1606
Thanks to everyone who offered useful information.
What about for those of us who reminded you that you owe an apology to @jmlanzaf because you got confused and chastised him incorrectly in an unrelated thread?
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
I'm good. But thanks for providing useful information on this thread!
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Lermish is wrong yet again. Yes, I did apologize when I realized my mistake (in the other thread) but I also feel sorry for the miserable who can't help themselves from attacking others at every opportunity, as well as deliberately switching comments between the two threads. Why are you trying to sabotage this thread? You owe me an apology. And you haven't even tried to answer the question that I posed. How childish! I'm hardly the first person to notice and comment about the problem posters who spend they sorry lives hanging out here. I've invested my five minutes and and am done for the day. See how easy it is? Bye for now.
No, you didn't. Here are all of your posts since then...where is the apology?
I was just trying to correct your error as you were, and clearly still are, very confused. You insulted @jmlanzaf by mistake because you got confused about which thread you were on. I moved your comment here to the correct thread, essentially without comment.
I figured you would be classy and want to apologize once you realized your mistake. I was wrong about that. Your snarky comment about "thanks" made your intention and attitude clear. I guess I shouldn't expect any gratitude for the help any time soon.
EDITED to remove a comment or two which, while valid, detract from my point.
I am interested in @messydesk 's answer. I greatly enjoyed his interview with Cabbage Coins this morning.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
Oh my
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Wondering if I should answer the OP's question or if we're beyond that now.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Please answer
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.