Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Heather, please remove me from this forum

burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,674 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

@PCGS_Moderator please remove me like my post that was removed; thanks!

Comments

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,671 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Temper tantrum?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,725 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just leave if you want to leave.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,107 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks like the whole thread is gone. Who started the thread and what was the purpose? 🤔

    There was already one thread about the 1959D cent closed and a duplicate one deleted. Was this a third attempt to highlight a problem attribution?

    The subject is obviously something that PCGS is trying to rectify.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,111 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 5:19PM

    @JBK said:
    It looks like the whole thread is gone. Who started the thread and what was the purpose? 🤔

    There was already one thread about the 1959D cent closed and a duplicate one deleted. Was this a third attempt to highlight a problem attribution?

    The subject is obviously something that PCGS is trying to rectify.

    I was under the impression that the thread referenced in the opening pos was the duplicate one (which was deleted) not a third one.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,671 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Temper tantrum?> @JBK said:

    It looks like the whole thread is gone. Who started the thread and what was the purpose? 🤔

    There was already one thread about the 1959D cent closed and a duplicate one deleted. Was this a third attempt to highlight a problem attribution?

    The subject is obviously something that PCGS is trying to rectify.

    No. His was the one that was deleted. They closed they other one. I don't see the big deal. Not the 1st time, not the last.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,671 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    Why ask to be removed? Just stay away until you're ready to return. I enjoyed you posts and hate to see you go. :)

    He wants to follow in Colonel Jessup's footsteps. But you have to curse and raise a bigger ruckus.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,239 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PCGS does not like to have the dirty laundry aired in public.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well, your request is easier to fulfill than removing a tattoo or stigma. I still like you.

    ``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5

  • HATTRICKHATTRICK Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭✭

    🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
    You need to throw a little gas on the fire.
    🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
    💀💀☠️☠️

    " If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. " The 1st Law of Opposition from The Firesign Theater
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,671 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 5:07PM

    @coinbuf said:
    PCGS does not like to have the dirty laundry aired in public.

    Demonstrably false since the original thread about that coin is still present. They simply deleted the duplicate thread when they closed the original.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,107 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Temper tantrum?> @JBK said:

    It looks like the whole thread is gone. Who started the thread and what was the purpose? 🤔

    There was already one thread about the 1959D cent closed and a duplicate one deleted. Was this a third attempt to highlight a problem attribution?

    The subject is obviously something that PCGS is trying to rectify.

    No. His was the one that was deleted. They closed they other one. I don't see the big deal. Not the 1st time, not the last.

    Aha! You guys missed the quickly deleted duplicate thread by bluhmp123 that he posted in the Q&A Forum. That one was deleted so I guess the score is one thread closed and two deleted.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,671 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 5:12PM

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Temper tantrum?> @JBK said:

    It looks like the whole thread is gone. Who started the thread and what was the purpose? 🤔

    There was already one thread about the 1959D cent closed and a duplicate one deleted. Was this a third attempt to highlight a problem attribution?

    The subject is obviously something that PCGS is trying to rectify.

    No. His was the one that was deleted. They closed they other one. I don't see the big deal. Not the 1st time, not the last.

    Aha! You guys missed the quickly deleted duplicate thread by bluhmp123 that he posted in the Q&A Forum. That one was deleted so I guess the score is one thread closed and two deleted.

    I see. I wish they'd delete more duplicate threads.

    I'd like to know what bluhmp123's story is. He seems awfully invested in this little mistake.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,693 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    I wish they'd delete more duplicate threads.

    Parking lot error finders hardest hit.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,671 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 5:14PM

    @MasonG said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    I wish they'd delete more duplicate threads.

    Parking lot error finders hardest hit.

    To be fair, those are NEW FINDS!!!! Fresh from the mud pits.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't get threads like this unless they are just for attention.
    An adult would just walk away

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,111 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Temper tantrum?> @JBK said:

    It looks like the whole thread is gone. Who started the thread and what was the purpose? 🤔

    There was already one thread about the 1959D cent closed and a duplicate one deleted. Was this a third attempt to highlight a problem attribution?

    The subject is obviously something that PCGS is trying to rectify.

    No. His was the one that was deleted. They closed they other one. I don't see the big deal. Not the 1st time, not the last.

    Aha! You guys missed the quickly deleted duplicate thread by bluhmp123 that he posted in the Q&A Forum. That one was deleted so I guess the score is one thread closed and two deleted.

    If it wasn’t posted on this particular forum it didn’t happen.😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 6:11PM

    We need to be mindful that this is not our forum.
    It belongs to PCGS to do with as it sees fit.
    If they deceided to do away with this forum altogether there wouldn't be a darn thing we could do about.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,111 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @coinbuf said:
    PCGS does not like to have the dirty laundry aired in public.

    Demonstrably false since the original thread about that coin is still present. They simply deleted the duplicate thread when they closed the original.

    By stating that the post was demonstrably false, you’re, in effect, saying that PCGS does like to have their dirty laundry aired in public. I disagree.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 13,010 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @coinbuf said:
    PCGS does not like to have the dirty laundry aired in public.

    Demonstrably false since the original thread about that coin is still present. They simply deleted the duplicate thread when they closed the original.

    By stating that the post was demonstrably false, you’re, in effect, saying that PCGS does like to have their dirty laundry aired in public. I disagree.

    Schrödinger's laundry.

  • lermishlermish Posts: 4,475 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:

    @MFeld said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @coinbuf said:
    PCGS does not like to have the dirty laundry aired in public.

    Demonstrably false since the original thread about that coin is still present. They simply deleted the duplicate thread when they closed the original.

    By stating that the post was demonstrably false, you’re, in effect, saying that PCGS does like to have their dirty laundry aired in public. I disagree.

    Schrödinger's laundry.

    H/t to @PeakRarities

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • TPringTPring Posts: 263 ✭✭✭

    @burfle23 said:
    @PCGS_Moderator please remove me...

    Just remember...the advice you receive on the site is worth every bit of what you paid for it.

This discussion has been closed.