Home U.S. Coin Forum

My PCGS Submissions!

GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

I have three submissions coming through, a crossover (NGC to PCGS), a 5-Coin US, and a World Coin. The crossover arrived today!!
Both coins were probably not the smartest decision but they are coins that I really love and I’m really happy to see that they BOTH crossed!


"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably

«1

Comments

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    I’m glad for you that the coins crossed. However, the cost to do so amounted to a high percentage of the coins’ values.

    I used vouchers so it was really only around $10 per coin

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,644 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good job! Keep us posted on the other grades and how you do with them also.

    I usually keep all the old tags with the coins when I crack and regrade, or cross over. Regular clear packing tape folded over so it gets both sides with one piece of tape (cheap, thin laminate) and then trimmed close to the label edges works well to protect them. A small piece of rolled scotch tape and they stick to the back of the PCGS holder easily and are always close at hand (and easily removable).


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2026 3:06PM

    @MFeld said:

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:
    I’m glad for you that the coins crossed. However, the cost to do so amounted to a high percentage of the coins’ values.

    I used vouchers so it was really only around $10 per coin

    That discounts the possibility that the vouchers could have later been (better) used for other submissions of higher value.

    All things considered those were probably the best-tier coins I could possibly buy
    I also just wanted those coins in new holders

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2026 3:47PM

    @MFeld said:

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:
    I’m glad for you that the coins crossed. However, the cost to do so amounted to a high percentage of the coins’ values.

    I used vouchers so it was really only around $10 per coin

    That discounts the possibility that the vouchers could have later been (better) used for other submissions of higher value.

    All things considered those were probably the best-tier coins I could possibly buy

    One last try..then why not buy such coins - which, by the way, look quite nice - already in their PCGS holders?

    The Morgan I bought before I had graded stuff on my mind (back around 2021-22) and the Walker I got just because it was really nice and it was only like $40 a few years back so I mean I didn't really have much to lose on either; it was also graded via voucher back when I had an NGC membership.

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 6,280 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Two straight crosses are good.

    Many happy BST transactions
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,886 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2026 4:38PM

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:
    I’m glad for you that the coins crossed. However, the cost to do so amounted to a high percentage of the coins’ values.

    I used vouchers so it was really only around $10 per coin

    That discounts the possibility that the vouchers could have later been (better) used for other submissions of higher value.

    All things considered those were probably the best-tier coins I could possibly buy

    One last try..then why not buy such coins - which, by the way, look quite nice - already in their PCGS holders?

    The Morgan I bought before I had graded stuff on my mind (back around 2021-22) and the Walker I got just because it was really nice and it was only like $40 a few years back so I mean I didn't really have much to lose on either; it was also graded via voucher back when I had an NGC membership.

    So you paid $80 to slab a $70 coin. That means you are $120 in to a $70 coin.

    Now, it's your money and you're right to do whatever you wish. There are also worse ways to spend money. But please make sure you're playing the game you want to play and not somebody else's game.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    So you paid $80 to slab a $70 coin. That means you are $120 in to a $70 coin.

    Now, it's your money and you're right to do whatever you wish. There are also worse ways to spend money. But please make sure you're playing the game you want to play and not somebody else's game.

    I think it's worth it if I personally enjoy the coin. I'm not looking to sell anything, just enjoy what I've got

    Also for the prior comment, I know they're not free, as I still have to pay for shipping, insurance, additional things such as TrueView, etc. but it's still $40 less I gotta pay

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,253 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:
    I’m glad for you that the coins crossed. However, the cost to do so amounted to a high percentage of the coins’ values.

    I used vouchers so it was really only around $10 per coin

    Regardless of how you wish to perceive this you paid for the vouchers when you bought either the gold or platinum level services vs the silver level with no vouchers. The gold level costs $149 vs $69 for the silver, an $80 upcharge which works out to $20 per voucher. Add in all the other costs (shipping, handling etc.) and it still cost you close to $40, then multiply that twice since you did the same at NGC and you now have $80+ in grading fees for a walker that is worth half that.

    If you are happy great, but it was not good money management.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:

    I think it's worth it if I personally enjoy the coin. I'm not looking to sell anything, just enjoy what I've got

    >

    What does crossing the coins have to do with enjoying what you have?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2026 6:04PM

    @MFeld said:

    @Goob said:

    I think it's worth it if I personally enjoy the coin. I'm not looking to sell anything, just enjoy what I've got

    >

    What does crossing the coins have to do with enjoying what you have?

    They’re both coins I liked, and the Morgan, for example, was in a holder too scuffed for me to enjoy, so I got it crossed over
    I also really didn’t want to sell them, as they’re both coins I think hold some sort of specialty to me, so the only thing to do was either recase them, which IMO NGC slabs scratch far too easily (no hate towards them, I just like my holders to have as few scuffs as possible) and so PCGS was my best bet.

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • bammbammbammbamm Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    I agree @Morgan White. If coin collecting is supposed to be about enjoyment and having fun, what's wrong with what @Goob did? You go @Goob. Crossover whatever you want. If it makes you happy, go for it.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bammbamm said:
    I agree @Morgan White. If coin collecting is supposed to be about enjoyment and having fun, what's wrong with what @Goob did? You go @Goob. Crossover whatever you want. If it makes you happy, go for it.

    Just because a number of us pointed out the true cost of the crossovers doesn’t mean we were telling @Goob he was having fun (or doing something) wrong. I hope that enjoying the hobby is number one on the priority list. Better yet, that it be informed/knowledgeable enjoyment.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,159 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    So you paid $80 to slab a $70 coin. That means you are $120 in to a $70 coin.

    Now, it's your money and you're right to do whatever you wish. There are also worse ways to spend money. But please make sure you're playing the game you want to play and not somebody else's game.

    I think it's worth it if I personally enjoy the coin. I'm not looking to sell anything, just enjoy what I've got

    *Also for the prior comment, I know they're not free, as I still have to pay for shipping, insurance, additional things such as TrueView, etc. but it's still $40 less I gotta pay

    With all due respect, i think you're still missing the point. Those vouchers were not "free". The cost of your membership was partially offset by the vouchers.

    Anyway, if you're happy that's fine. But your approach is a little costly. I think a lot of people are enticed into buying premium memberships by these "free" vouchers. 🤷‍♂️

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,886 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:
    Lol, everyone picking on Goob for having fun wrong.

    Lol. I told him that whatever he wants is fine. But he does seem to be ignoring the real costs and we were just trying to clarify it for him.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:
    Anyway, if you're happy that's fine. But your approach is a little costly. I think a lot of people are enticed into buying premium memberships by these "free" vouchers. 🤷‍♂️

    I mean as I mentioned I know they aren’t free, but at least its less money I gotta pay
    I mean $40 to submit one coin is a bit outta my budget yknow? I’d rather have more to spend on coins! The vouchers just make it less of a pain

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,886 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 6, 2026 8:03AM

    @Goob said:

    @JBK said:
    Anyway, if you're happy that's fine. But your approach is a little costly. I think a lot of people are enticed into buying premium memberships by these "free" vouchers. 🤷‍♂️

    I mean as I mentioned I know they aren’t free, but at least its less money I gotta pay
    I mean $40 to submit one coin is a bit outta my budget yknow? I’d rather have more to spend on coins! The vouchers just make it less of a pain

    That's the point. You PAID $40 to submit one coin. The voucher costs you the price of membership.

    I don't have a PCGS membership right now. Why? Because I don't have enough coins to submit, so I submit through a dealer. When I have enough coins, I buy a membership to get the vouchers. But it saves me nothing.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Goob said:

    @JBK said:
    Anyway, if you're happy that's fine. But your approach is a little costly. I think a lot of people are enticed into buying premium memberships by these "free" vouchers. 🤷‍♂️

    I mean as I mentioned I know they aren’t free, but at least its less money I gotta pay
    I mean $40 to submit one coin is a bit outta my budget yknow? I’d rather have more to spend on coins! The vouchers just make it less of a pain

    That's the point. You PAID $40 to submit one coin. The voucher costs you the price of membership.

    I don't have a PCGS membership right now. Why? Because I don't have enough coins to submit, so I submit through a dealer. When I have enough coins, I but a membership to get the vouchers. But it saves me nothing.

    Fair enough
    at least it was worth it to get my lone gold coin graded though
    ...even if it’s been sitting in encapsulation for the past like month

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,921 ✭✭✭✭✭


    This is one of my submissions. You’ll notice the damage from a chop mark which doesn’t bother PCGS when it comes to grading. Then there’s this chopped up dollar. I wouldn’t bother submitting, but would probably be VG details (damage).


    Enjoy ! Be selective and have fun.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 6, 2026 10:38AM

    The US world coin submission FINALLY passed encapsulation! Thankfully grades aren't posted yet so I can still be surprised when the package arrives, BUT Trueviews are posted!
    Once again, probably not the wisest decisions (aside for MAYBE the 1878 7/8TF), but I really love the coins
    Guesses:
    1885 $1: MS64
    1886 $1: MS63
    1890: MS62-63 (mainly hoping it doesn't get details)
    1957 50C: I honestly don't know but I'm HOPING it gets CAM
    1878 7/8TF: AU55, AU58, or MS62 (mainly hoping it doesn't get details)
    I'll update this with better images (as I could only download from the submission page, NOT the TrueView page so the images are bound to be blurry)




    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Your 1957 half dollar certainly looks Cameo.
    What’s your concern with the 1890 dollar?

    Good luck.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    Your 1957 half dollar certainly looks Cameo.
    What’s your concern with the 1890 dollar?

    Good luck.

    The 1890 may or may not have been originally "slabbed" by NGC (but they didn't feel like slabbing it) and they called it obverse shipping. I personally disagree because both sides IMO genuinely look pretty much the same with luster and there's really no excess hairlines, so I think it shouldn't really be that bad. (at least I got most of my money back from NGC!)

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 933 ✭✭✭✭

    Not everything must have a bottom line on some expense spread sheet (@MFeld @Cougar1978).
    As Mr. M. White points out, please let Goob have some fun.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RedRocket said:
    Not everything must have a bottom line on some expense spread sheet (@MFeld @Cougar1978).
    As Mr. M. White points out, please let Goob have some fun.

    I never said otherwise. As I posted previously:
    Just because a number of us pointed out the true cost of the crossovers doesn’t mean we were telling @Goob he was having fun (or doing something) wrong. I hope that enjoying the hobby is number one on the priority list. Better yet, that it be informed/knowledgeable enjoyment.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 933 ✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @RedRocket said:
    Not everything must have a bottom line on some expense spread sheet (@MFeld @Cougar1978).
    As Mr. M. White points out, please let Goob have some fun.

    I never said otherwise. As I posted previously:
    Just because a number of us pointed out the true cost of the crossovers doesn’t mean we were telling @Goob he was having fun (or doing something) wrong. I hope that enjoying the hobby is number one on the priority list. Better yet, that it be informed/knowledgeable enjoyment.

    There is a lady on this forum (I won't divulge her identity other than to say she buys and sells pennies) who posts wonderful and entertaining threads on coin shows. She frequently will feature bottles of wine and scrumptious meals at famous steak houses throughout the country. These are not cheap or inexpensive. Not a single member here, including MFeld mocks her for the choices she makes.
    The takeaway: Please, let the Goob be a Goob and enjoy this hobby as he sees fit.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 6, 2026 11:19AM

    And now, we got the last trueview! This is for the third submission, the singular world coin!
    My one and only gold coin, Russian 5 Rouble 1904
    The value of this pretty much doubled since I first purchased it a little over a year ago...

    @MFeld , what do you think?

    On another note, AI (Microsoft Copilot) called the 1885 Morgan from my US submission an MS64. Let's see if they're right once I get the submission back!

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RedRocket said:

    @MFeld said:

    @RedRocket said:
    Not everything must have a bottom line on some expense spread sheet (@MFeld @Cougar1978).
    As Mr. M. White points out, please let Goob have some fun.

    I never said otherwise. As I posted previously:
    Just because a number of us pointed out the true cost of the crossovers doesn’t mean we were telling @Goob he was having fun (or doing something) wrong. I hope that enjoying the hobby is number one on the priority list. Better yet, that it be informed/knowledgeable enjoyment.

    There is a lady on this forum (I won't divulge her identity other than to say she buys and sells pennies) who posts wonderful and entertaining threads on coin shows. She frequently will feature bottles of wine and scrumptious meals at famous steak houses throughout the country. These are not cheap or inexpensive. Not a single member here, including MFeld mocks her for the choices she makes.
    The takeaway: Please, let the Goob be a Goob and enjoy this hobby as he sees fit.

    No one has mocked @Goob, and as far as I know, all of us want him to enjoy the hobby, however he sees fit. Pointing out the true cost of submissions - something that he might not have been aware of - isn’t inconsistent with that. And whether you see it this way or not, a number of us have tried to help him navigate the hobby, without telling him he should do so any particular way.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 933 ✭✭✭✭

    MFeld, I wouldn't be scolding you other than you being an esteemed member of this board and your words have meaning. Also, your tone.
    (You came off a bit condescending toward newbie Goob: "What does crossing the coins have to do with enjoying what you have?")
    I do appreciate your explanation though and will take that into account in the future before judging you too harshly.
    Regards,
    R. Rocket

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RedRocket said:
    MFeld, I wouldn't be scolding you other than you being an esteemed member of this board and your words have meaning. Also, your tone.
    (You came off a bit condescending toward newbie Goob: "What does crossing the coins have to do with enjoying what you have?")
    I do appreciate your explanation though and will take that into account in the future before judging you too harshly.
    Regards,
    R. Rocket

    My question to @Goob “What does crossing the coins have to do with enjoying what you have?” wasn’t meant to sound condescending and I apologize to him if it came across that way.

    It was in reply to a post of his, which said, in part “I think it's worth it if I personally enjoy the coin. I'm not looking to sell anything, just enjoy what I've got.” Considering that it was his reply to a post which noted @Goob’s submission cost, it sounded to me as if he was equating a crossover with enjoying the coin. So I asked my question in order to see if that was the case.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • ShaunBC5ShaunBC5 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll say I’ve appreciated the math lesson on submissions/vouchers/memberships. I haven’t submitted or crossed before and go back and forth between using a dealer or doing so myself (if I ever get around to it) and getting a membership. Goob did what he wanted and hopefully the grades come back nicely for him.
    Fo me, I’ll have to figure out what makes the most sense for my collection, which could just be selling what I’ve got and buying what I want in the lower end stuff.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    I accidentally looked at the grade of the 1878 7/8TF, it was MS62!!
    $300 value (according to PCGS) that I paid $85 for!

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • stawickstawick Posts: 512 ✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:
    The US world coin submission FINALLY passed encapsulation! Thankfully grades aren't posted yet so I can still be surprised when the package arrives, BUT Trueviews are posted!
    Once again, probably not the wisest decisions (aside for MAYBE the 1878 7/8TF), but I really love the coins
    Guesses:
    1885 $1: MS64
    1886 $1: MS63
    1890: MS62-63 (mainly hoping it doesn't get details)
    1957 50C: I honestly don't know but I'm HOPING it gets CAM
    1878 7/8TF: AU55, AU58, or MS62 (mainly hoping it doesn't get details)
    I'll update this with better images (as I could only download from the submission page, NOT the TrueView page so the images are bound to be blurry)




    Nice. B)
    I like Franklin halves. Kinda wish we'd go back to that ... maybe swap JFK on the Hundy / cnote, and Franky on the 50c. I know the reverse dont cut it as it needs a bigger eagle - but I like the bell.

    Also, I have about 20 various coins pre-1925 - many 19th century, and I KNOW many of them are NOT worth getting slabbed. But these were old coins I got as a kid before I got myself into modern proofs. I may submit them at some point, a few may pay for the overall grading - dunno. It sentimental, I suppose.
    Heck, I'm sure many of the moderns I get graded are not worth it - today. But when my nieces get them, it'll help them sell 'em off.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goob dont take it to hard. Mfeld does his best to teach us, always.
    If you listen to him, he won't steer you wrong.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,476 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stawick said:

    @Goob said:
    The US world coin submission FINALLY passed encapsulation! Thankfully grades aren't posted yet so I can still be surprised when the package arrives, BUT Trueviews are posted!
    Once again, probably not the wisest decisions (aside for MAYBE the 1878 7/8TF), but I really love the coins
    Guesses:
    1885 $1: MS64
    1886 $1: MS63
    1890: MS62-63 (mainly hoping it doesn't get details)
    1957 50C: I honestly don't know but I'm HOPING it gets CAM
    1878 7/8TF: AU55, AU58, or MS62 (mainly hoping it doesn't get details)
    I'll update this with better images (as I could only download from the submission page, NOT the TrueView page so the images are bound to be blurry)




    Nice. B)
    I like Franklin halves. Kinda wish we'd go back to that ... maybe swap JFK on the Hundy / cnote, and Franky on the 50c. I know the reverse dont cut it as it needs a bigger eagle - but I like the bell.

    Also, I have about 20 various coins pre-1925 - many 19th century, and I KNOW many of them are NOT worth getting slabbed. But these were old coins I got as a kid before I got myself into modern proofs. I may submit them at some point, a few may pay for the overall grading - dunno. It sentimental, I suppose.
    Heck, I'm sure many of the moderns I get graded are not worth it - today. But when my nieces get them, it'll help them sell 'em off.

    Ok, he got the TVs but not the grades? In my experience the grades pop then the TVs a week or two later.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,476 ✭✭✭✭✭

    TV images:





  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    crossover PCGS vs NGC images:



    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 933 ✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:
    crossover PCGS vs NGC images:



    Next assignment, if you're up for it:
    See if all those coins will now cross to ICG.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    @RedRocket said:

    @Goob said:
    crossover PCGS vs NGC images:



    Next assignment, if you're up for it:
    See if all those coins will now cross to ICG.

    they’d prob grade 1-2 higher lol

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,886 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:

    @RedRocket said:

    @Goob said:
    crossover PCGS vs NGC images:

    Next assignment, if you're up for it:
    See if all those coins will now cross to ICG.

    they’d prob grade 1-2 higher lol

    Don't be so sure.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Don't be so sure.

    Is ICG strict on Morgans and Walkers?

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,253 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Don't be so sure.

    Is ICG strict on Morgans and Walkers?

    Not about being strict, about getting it right. ICG might get the grade correct on that 1878 which should be AU.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,757 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goob said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Don't be so sure.

    Is ICG strict on Morgans and Walkers?

    Strict or lenient or whatever, the point that the vast majority of collectors don't understand is that each TPG (or whatever level of respect you want to accord a company) has its own proprietary grading standards. What one must hope for is that the TPG adheres to those standards in a consistent manner. Very few collectors, and this includes many, many collectors you will read on this board, understand that fact. How the market accepts and reacts to those standards is key. Currently, the market values PCGS and CACG the most, in my opinion and experience and over the most broadly defined term of "accepts", while it gives significant weight to NGC as well. CAC is a different entity from a TPG in this discussion, in my opinion.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • GoobGoob Posts: 260 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 7, 2026 8:04PM

    @coinbuf said:

    @Goob said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Don't be so sure.

    Is ICG strict on Morgans and Walkers?

    Not about being strict, about getting it right. ICG might get the grade correct on that 1878 which should be AU.

    I mean looking at other 1878 7/8TFs, it looks like it’s most likely comparable to the others

    Not that it adds more but Microsoft Copilot agrees lol

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 933 ✭✭✭✭

    Goob spitt'in truth bombs.
    Red approves.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file