New Purchase: 1886 PCGS PR66 CAC (Green) Seated Half
I got a call from a local seller about a large lot of proof coins. I purchased 3, this one is the proof seated half. I am posting the Heritage pics of the coin since is was in one of their auctions a bit back. What do you think? Opinions welcome.

Brian
26
Comments
Nice!
Those pics won't show hairlines that might be present. Otherwise, it sure looks nice!
"She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
running like a water color in the rain...."
Nice coin!
Looks good.
Me like!
It looks very nice but HA glamour shots leave quite a bit to be desired.
That’s awesome!
My YouTube Channel
Beauty.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Very nice pickup!
Fantastic coin!!
HA probably doing that coin no good. I suspect tilted properly, it is a beauty. As Catbert points out, hairlines are critical for grades of such proofs and these images won't show them.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
I will wait to see what it looks like under a bright light, and not Heritages edited images.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Hairlines on a 66 CAC should be extremely minimal. The HA photos are not good. I'm sure the coin looks much better in-hand.
Nothing is as expensive as free money.
Wow, nice
Looks good from here!
Congratulations!!!🎈🎉
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Would like to see a zoomed out shot to see the awesome contrast in the old green holder.
Now that is a WOW coin for sure
While everyone’s comments about hairlines on proof coins is true, including they typically don’t show up in photos of proof coins, I would think CHANCES are, you’re ok, since BOTH PCGS AND CAC take the quantity of hairlines into account in determining if the coin is solid as a PR66 before applying their grade and their sticker. Sure, they err at times, but as noted, in my opinion, chances are they both did not.
Steve
My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
Oy vey. That's lovely, and way beyond my caliber.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.