Home U.S. Coin Forum

Is the Mint repricing way out of line? (Poll)

cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited January 16, 2026 4:54PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Is the Mint repricing way out of line?

Many happy BST transactions

Is the Mint repricing way out of line? (Poll)

Sign in to vote!
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
«1

Comments

  • MtW124MtW124 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    Insanity

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 11,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They won't have to sell as many.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Old_CollectorOld_Collector Posts: 724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    I think that they will figure out that they screwed up with the sets that do not contain precious metals and will correct it downward, who knows perhaps $45 with 95% copper cents. They will sell very few over $100, and the same is true for the huge increase in AI proof and reverse proof sets.

    Silver and gold products will be far more expensive depending on the spot market movement and may really have a negative effect on mintage levels for ASEs and gold products.

  • TrampTramp Posts: 929 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No

    Not really considering the jump in silver prices. Always felt that collecting silver eagles from the mint that were never meant to enter circulation, at any time, was simply investing in bullion that happened to have a date on it; always at risk of future melt.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 38,368 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    @Tramp said:
    Not really considering the jump in silver prices. Always felt that collecting silver eagles from the mint that were never meant to enter circulation, at any time, was simply investing in bullion that happened to have a date on it; always at risk of future melt.

    Uncirculated Coin Set 2026
    Annual Sets
    Multi (D)(P)
    Current Product
    Subscription
    $124.50

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,651 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    Always....

  • TrampTramp Posts: 929 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No

    @MsMorrisine said:

    @Tramp said:
    Not really considering the jump in silver prices. Always felt that collecting silver eagles from the mint that were never meant to enter circulation, at any time, was simply investing in bullion that happened to have a date on it; always at risk of future melt.

    Uncirculated Coin Set 2026
    Annual Sets
    Multi (D)(P)
    Current Product
    Subscription
    $124.50

    Then the subject of this poll needs to be more defined!

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,912 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @EXOJUNKIE said:
    I didn’t vote because there wasn’t an option that said “I don’t care because I’ve never bought any mint products anyway.” 😈

    Not never, but not for a long time.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 30,974 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    Its almost to bad that there's gotta be such a BIG money grab like that

  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    And I don't think they're done raising prices yet...

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 39,802 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No

    @Onastone said:
    And I don't think they're done raising prices yet...

    I think they are for now.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • olympicsosolympicsos Posts: 967 ✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    The non precious metal prices are ridiculous. At this point, I would rather discontinue the clad proof set in favor of the silver proof set. If they are raising prices on uncirculated sets, might as well make it a silver uncirculated set. Either way, the hobby has collectively let go of clad coins and the hobby will may be better off if the only way to get current examples of clad coins is out of circulation.

  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    Yes, with one caveat. We are the buyers. If you feel like they are trying to rip you off don't buy, especially when it comes to non-PM items.

    I'm still fuzzy on the idea that I have to sell based on the cost to replace the item versus the cost incurred to make the item being sold. There may be some legitimacy for items containing PMs but for non-PM items it doesn't fly.

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,373 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    $100 is a lot for a clad set that will see a large percentage of its total production forgotten about in someone’s garage.

  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,240 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 17, 2026 9:14AM
    No

    Last mint product I bought was a 1968 mint set. It was $3.50 I think. Still have it.

  • rte592rte592 Posts: 2,142 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Remember that saying ;) whatever the market will bear :D
    Did the mint get a new CEO/Money manager?

    Confucius Says
    At the current time there may be a glut of fish in the pond...some hungry.

  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 6,971 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    I voted yes, but to me it’s not really so much the pricing that keeps me from wanting to order mint products, it’s more that they are manufactured collectables and not real coins. Too many offerings and too easy for them to produce nothing but 69’s and 70’s with modern minting techniques. Why buy manufactured collectables when they can simply mint as many as they choose to?

    Mr_Spud

  • mach19mach19 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭
    edited January 18, 2026 9:52AM
    Yes

    **EXCLUDING the ( 2 ) Lincolns .... The face value is $5.80 in the uncirculated set.

    UNREAL !!

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,373 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    @Mr_Spud said:
    I voted yes, but to me it’s not really so much the pricing that keeps me from wanting to order mint products, it’s more that they are manufactured collectables and not real coins. Too many offerings and too easy for them to produce nothing but 69’s and 70’s with modern minting techniques. Why buy manufactured collectables when they can simply mint as many as they choose to?

    It reminds me of collectible stamps and the U.S. Postal Service.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,373 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 17, 2026 1:10PM
    Yes

    @mach19 said:
    **EXCLUDING the ( 2 ) Lincolns .... The face value is $3.80 in the uncirculated set.

    UNREAL !!

    Original issue price was $2.50, but he wasn’t off by much. Face value was $1.33. Not $3.80. There was a single half dollar that year with two quarters, two dimes, two nickels, and three cents (third was S mint).

  • mach19mach19 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭
    Yes

    @cameonut2011 said:

    @mach19 said:
    **EXCLUDING the ( 2 ) Lincolns .... The face value is $3.80 in the uncirculated set.

    UNREAL !!

    Original issue price was $2.50, but he wasn’t off by much. Face value was $1.33. Not $3.80. There was a single half dollar that year with two quarters, two dimes, two nickels, and three cents (third was S mint).

    I'm sorry my friend , I was talking about the 2026 mint set

  • mach19mach19 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭
    Yes

    @NJCoin said:
    I'm guessing this is what we get when you have a Mint Director coming from the world of TV numismatic telemarketing. Based on this pricing, the whole Mint numismatic operation is now being run as though it was being run by HSN or The Coin Vault.

    And to think my biggest fear going in was just that more of everything would be directed away from retail and towards the Big Boys. It turns out everything is now going to be a "special limited edition" at prices that are not really justifiable to an average collector. 190K for a clad uncirculated set at $124.50, when they barely sold that many at $33.25 before last year.

    The timing sucks, given that I was pretty excited about the coming semiquincentennial offerings. But if $125 for a clad uncirculated set is not a mistake, everything is going to priced like a special limited edition Trump watch or Trump phone being sold on TV, and I might finally be cured of my addiction to collecting this stuff.

    Amen...... I'm with you my friend !!!

  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    Just noticed the American Innovation RP set nearly doubled. Was $32.25 now $60. My only set I keep up to date in a Dansco.

    Many happy BST transactions
  • bsshog40bsshog40 Posts: 4,031 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    I quit in 2020. They raised prices then that I decided were never worth the price. Most definitely are not now.

  • 124Spider124Spider Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No

    The retail side of the US Mint is a for-profit enterprise. They're entitled to price their products as they wish, and we're entitled to pass on buying them if we wish.

  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 5,209 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    I expected an increase on the silver items. But an $80 increase for an ASE seems a little steep at the moment. Do they really need a $90 premium to make a silver dollar? It's not like they can't reprice as needed.

    The Clad increases are ridiculous. The P&D quarter rolls just increased from what... $42 to $56? Almost $30/roll for average circulation strike quarters in a pretty wrapper.

    The $125 for a standard circulation quality "Mint Set". That is insane. There is not even $6 face of average strike coins here. Some of these sets look like they scoop the coins out of a ballistic bag with a shovel before putting them in the blister packs. How can they justify $119 over face for fancy packed pocket change?

  • PapiNEPapiNE Posts: 434 ✭✭✭✭
    No

    Demand is strong and pockets are deep.

    USAF veteran 1984-2005

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @124Spider said:
    The retail side of the US Mint is a for-profit enterprise. They're entitled to price their products as they wish, and we're entitled to pass on buying them if we wish.

    Correct. But it's also a government agency that is supposed to be providing a service to the public and the hobby.

    The Coin Vault, HSN and RCTV already exist as retailers ready, willing and able to provide overpriced numismatic product to the uninformed masses via an expensive distribution platform.

    The Mint, OTOH, is the single largest manufacturer of coinage in the world. There is absolutely no excuse for it to be testing the limits of what the market will bear for, now, everything it sells, just because its new director comes from the world of numismatic telemarketing.

    They are entitled to do whatever they want, including destroying the hobby by collapsing margins for their retail partners, pricing out collectors with limited means, and making even the occasional flip not worth chasing for would-be flippers. All that will be left will be people hoarding "limited edition" zinc cents at $50 each.

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 18, 2026 2:29PM

    @Batman23 said:
    I expected an increase on the silver items. But an $80 increase for an ASE seems a little steep at the moment. Do they really need a $90 premium to make a silver dollar? It's not like they can't reprice as needed.

    The Clad increases are ridiculous. The P&D quarter rolls just increased from what... $42 to $56? Almost $30/roll for average circulation strike quarters in a pretty wrapper.

    The $125 for a standard circulation quality "Mint Set". That is insane. There is not even $6 face of average strike coins here. Some of these sets look like they scoop the coins out of a ballistic bag with a shovel before putting them in the blister packs. How can they justify $119 over face for fancy packed pocket change?

    They are justifying it because they contain cents unavailable elsewhere, and because 2025 sets shot up in value in the expectation that they contained the last cents. But now that people know cents are going to be annual thing, I really can't see people putting a $50 premium on 200K of them going forward.

    Many items with far lower mintages don't have that kind of premium over intrinsic value. People collected cents because they were an inexpensive entry point into the hobby. And because they circulated. Now you can't say either is still true. An ounce of silver costs $80 while two new pennies cost $120.

    I can't see people chasing 200K zinc NCLT at these prices going forward. TBD, but they are limiting the mintage to the same 190K as last year. I bet they don't come close to selling out at $124.50 each, no matter how the 2025s are doing. And, I bet they also come back down to earth, once people see that cents are going to be included in all sets going forward.

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    Of course YES. I’ve been a loyal Mint purchaser since the early 80’s and as of 2023, have cut back to maybe 2 or 3 coins since then due to their greed. Last silver proof set I purchased was in 2020 for $63. 95 which essentially has the same configuration of coins for which the Mint is now charging $245.00. Come on! No one in their right mind is going to pay that much, unless you’re an idiot. I see their numbers dropping dramatically. The mint is done!

  • mach19mach19 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭
    Yes

    @NJCoin said:

    @Batman23 said:
    I expected an increase on the silver items. But an $80 increase for an ASE seems a little steep at the moment. Do they really need a $90 premium to make a silver dollar? It's not like they can't reprice as needed.

    The Clad increases are ridiculous. The P&D quarter rolls just increased from what... $42 to $56? Almost $30/roll for average circulation strike quarters in a pretty wrapper.

    The $125 for a standard circulation quality "Mint Set". That is insane. There is not even $6 face of average strike coins here. Some of these sets look like they scoop the coins out of a ballistic bag with a shovel before putting them in the blister packs. How can they justify $119 over face for fancy packed pocket change?

    They are justifying it because they contain cents unavailable elsewhere, and because 2025 sets shot up in value in the expectation that they contained the last cents. But now that people know cents are going to be annual thing, I really can't see people putting a $50 premium on 200K of them going forward.

    Many items with far lower mintages don't have that kind of premium over intrinsic value. People collected cents because they were an inexpensive entry point into the hobby. And because they circulated. Now you can't say either is still true. An ounce of silver costs $80 while two new pennies cost $120.

    I can't see people chasing 200K zinc NCLT at these prices going forward. TBD, but they are limiting the mintage to the same 190K as last year. I bet they don't come close to selling out at $124.50 each, no matter how the 2025s are doing. And, I bet they also come back down to earth, once people see that cents are going to be included in all sets going forward.

    I couldn't agree with you more !!!

    When do you see them coming back to earth ?

    It won't be today...... Tomorrow isn't looking good either !

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mach19 said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @Batman23 said:
    I expected an increase on the silver items. But an $80 increase for an ASE seems a little steep at the moment. Do they really need a $90 premium to make a silver dollar? It's not like they can't reprice as needed.

    The Clad increases are ridiculous. The P&D quarter rolls just increased from what... $42 to $56? Almost $30/roll for average circulation strike quarters in a pretty wrapper.

    The $125 for a standard circulation quality "Mint Set". That is insane. There is not even $6 face of average strike coins here. Some of these sets look like they scoop the coins out of a ballistic bag with a shovel before putting them in the blister packs. How can they justify $119 over face for fancy packed pocket change?

    They are justifying it because they contain cents unavailable elsewhere, and because 2025 sets shot up in value in the expectation that they contained the last cents. But now that people know cents are going to be annual thing, I really can't see people putting a $50 premium on 200K of them going forward.

    Many items with far lower mintages don't have that kind of premium over intrinsic value. People collected cents because they were an inexpensive entry point into the hobby. And because they circulated. Now you can't say either is still true. An ounce of silver costs $80 while two new pennies cost $120.

    I can't see people chasing 200K zinc NCLT at these prices going forward. TBD, but they are limiting the mintage to the same 190K as last year. I bet they don't come close to selling out at $124.50 each, no matter how the 2025s are doing. And, I bet they also come back down to earth, once people see that cents are going to be included in all sets going forward.

    I couldn't agree with you more !!!

    When do you see them coming back to earth ?

    It won't be today...... Tomorrow isn't looking good either !

    I don't. In my lifetime, they only rolled back prices once - in 2023 on the Morgan and Peace Dollars.

    All kidding aside, if the new guy wants to run it more like a retail enterprise than as a service to the collector community, @jmlanzaf is right about future pricing. They will take advantage of their monopoly position to squeeze every last cent out of everything, driving out people who don't want to play, and making mint off everyone else.

    No reason to roll anything back when there is no competition. Just demand destruction, which they might not care about, since the whole numismatic program is nothing more than a side hustle for them at the end of the day.

    They make gazillions from seigniorage, in spite of the relatively small sums they lost on cents and still lose on nickels, and also make a lot from the bullion program. If they want to squeeze numismatics for as much as they can, nothing will stop them, and they might or might not react to lower demand.

    My crystal ball honestly does not see out that far. And my fear is that they are going to squeeze me out of all the semiquincentennial goodies I have spent the better part of a year looking forward to. What I have learned, however, is that no amount of lobbying or whining here is going to change anything, because they have clearly already set a course that is going to last at least through 2026.

  • mach19mach19 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭
    Yes

    @NJCoin said:

    @mach19 said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @Batman23 said:
    I expected an increase on the silver items. But an $80 increase for an ASE seems a little steep at the moment. Do they really need a $90 premium to make a silver dollar? It's not like they can't reprice as needed.

    The Clad increases are ridiculous. The P&D quarter rolls just increased from what... $42 to $56? Almost $30/roll for average circulation strike quarters in a pretty wrapper.

    The $125 for a standard circulation quality "Mint Set". That is insane. There is not even $6 face of average strike coins here. Some of these sets look like they scoop the coins out of a ballistic bag with a shovel before putting them in the blister packs. How can they justify $119 over face for fancy packed pocket change?

    They are justifying it because they contain cents unavailable elsewhere, and because 2025 sets shot up in value in the expectation that they contained the last cents. But now that people know cents are going to be annual thing, I really can't see people putting a $50 premium on 200K of them going forward.

    Many items with far lower mintages don't have that kind of premium over intrinsic value. People collected cents because they were an inexpensive entry point into the hobby. And because they circulated. Now you can't say either is still true. An ounce of silver costs $80 while two new pennies cost $120.

    I can't see people chasing 200K zinc NCLT at these prices going forward. TBD, but they are limiting the mintage to the same 190K as last year. I bet they don't come close to selling out at $124.50 each, no matter how the 2025s are doing. And, I bet they also come back down to earth, once people see that cents are going to be included in all sets going forward.

    I couldn't agree with you more !!!

    When do you see them coming back to earth ?

    It won't be today...... Tomorrow isn't looking good either !

    I don't. In my lifetime, they only rolled back prices once - in 2023 on the Morgan and Peace Dollars.

    All kidding aside, if the new guy wants to run it more like a retail enterprise than as a service to the collector community, @jmlanzaf is right about future pricing. They will take advantage of their monopoly position to squeeze every last cent out of everything, driving out people who don't want to play, and making mint off everyone else.

    No reason to roll anything back when there is no competition. Just demand destruction, which they might not care about, since the whole numismatic program is nothing more than a side hustle for them at the end of the day.

    They make gazillions from seigniorage, in spite of the relatively small sums they lost on cents and still lose on nickels, and also make a lot from the bullion program. If they want to squeeze numismatics for as much as they can, nothing will stop them, and they might or might not react to lower demand.

    My crystal ball honestly does not see out that far. And my fear is that they are going to squeeze me out of all the semiquincentennial goodies I have spent the better part of a year looking forward to. What I have learned, however, is that no amount of lobbying or whining here is going to change anything, because they have clearly already set a course that is going to last at least through 2026.

    CORRECT !!!

  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,083 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It doesn't matter what the public thinks.
    If you want mint products, you have mint prices.

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    @PTVETTER said:
    It doesn't matter what the public thinks.
    If you want mint products, you have mint prices.

    Let them eat cake.

    Many happy BST transactions
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,644 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    Sales will drop, then there'll be FOMO-driven purchases to raise them, especially with the sets being the only way to get the cent. Then come assorted well-managed promotions involving special labels and such to get the coins into the hands of "end users" who will be the ones holding the bag, as everyone else has finished making their money on them.

    Will they be more profitable as a result? Maybe. I'm happy continuing to spend my money elsewhere.

  • ELVIS1ELVIS1 Posts: 410 ✭✭✭✭
    Shut up and take my money!

    It is what it is.
    Where else you going to get it?

  • lsicalsica Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭✭
    No

    I think the increase may be to avoid getting way too many orders than they can handle. Mint set sales haven't broken a million in decades, and if they mint doesn't sell them in rolls the only way you'll be able to get the 26 P & D Lincolns is in a Mint Set. if they were still only $33 sales figures would easily be in the multiple millions, and that might be more than they can handle. The $124 price will limit sales quite a bit. We might even see the lowest mintage for a non-proof cent in over 100 years. IMHO if you can sit on it for a while (after the usual peak/crash mint products always seem to go through in the secondary market) I think the mint set even at $124 is going to be a good deal.

    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ELVIS1 said:
    It is what it is.
    Where else you going to get it?

    Nowhere. I'll live without it. Demand is not inelastic, and they cannot just get whatever they want for anything they want to sell.

    At least not from me. The 2026 cents are zinc NCLT. You do you. I'm not spending around $50 each for two of them, embedded in a $124.50 set that includes around another $5-6 in pocket change.

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lsica said:
    I think the increase may be to avoid getting way too many orders than they can handle. Mint set sales haven't broken a million in decades, and if they mint doesn't sell them in rolls the only way you'll be able to get the 26 P & D Lincolns is in a Mint Set. if they were still only $33 sales figures would easily be in the multiple millions, and that might be more than they can handle. The $124 price will limit sales quite a bit. We might even see the lowest mintage for a non-proof cent in over 100 years. IMHO if you can sit on it for a while (after the usual peak/crash mint products always seem to go through in the secondary market) I think the mint set even at $124 is going to be a good deal.

    No. The increase is because they are being pigs, and want to monetize the fact that the sets will be the only place to get uncirculated 2026 cents. Not because they lack the capacity to make as many sets as people want, and to sell them all at $33 each.

    After all, at the end of the day, they are the US Mint. They will be making and distributing hundreds of billions of other coins this year. Don't sell them short.

  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 2,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes

    @cheezhed said:
    Is the Mint repricing way out of line?

    ATP don't buy from the mint. Boycott.

    Proud follower of Christ!

  • lsicalsica Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭✭
    No

    @NJCoin said:

    After all, at the end of the day, they are the US Mint. They will be making and distributing hundreds of billions of other coins this year. Don't sell them short.

    Sure they can make billions of coins, but do they still have the capacity/packaging to put together millions of sets?

    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lsica said:

    @NJCoin said:

    After all, at the end of the day, they are the US Mint. They will be making and distributing hundreds of billions of other coins this year. Don't sell them short.

    Sure they can make billions of coins, but do they still have the capacity/packaging to put together millions of sets?

    Yes, if they wanted to.

    And, don't kid yourself. The number would be hundreds of thousands. Not millions.

    Hasn't been for many, many years. Millions was 50 years ago. And, they did it then, they can certainly do it now.

    Making artificial rarities to sell at auction, and limiting mintages on special coins like privy ASEs and FH gold coins is one thing. Restricting the public's ability to collect annual circulating coin sets is quite another. And then pricing the public out is really inexcusable for a public agency. Shame on them!

  • ELVIS1ELVIS1 Posts: 410 ✭✭✭✭
    Shut up and take my money!

    @NJCoin said:

    @ELVIS1 said:
    It is what it is.
    Where else you going to get it?

    Nowhere. I'll live without it. Demand is not inelastic, and they cannot just get whatever they want for anything they want to sell.

    At least not from me. The 2026 cents are zinc NCLT. You do you. I'm not spending around $50 each for two of them, embedded in a $124.50 set that includes around another $5-6 in pocket change.

    As do I. I have only bought one thing from the mint in the last 15 years and that was the ASE with the Marine corps privy and truthfully I would have paid whatever for it, hence my vote.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file