Home U.S. Coin Forum

$2, $5 and $10 value circulating coins

HalfDimeHalfDime Posts: 706 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited December 11, 2025 8:48AM in U.S. Coin Forum

$2, $5 and $10 value circulating coins—

"the CCAC recommends seeking authorization for the issuance of higher value circulating coins available for spending to renew the relevancy and role of coinage in the American economy as a cost-effective medium of exchange. This approach has been adopted by many other countries."

This was in the CCAC meetings a few months ago (July 28th).

Another interesting recommendation is for the mint to use up old planchets:

"One Cent Coins in Mint and Proof Annual Sets—with the planned cessation of one cent production, the CCAC recommends that the Mint use the remaining existing supply of planchets, and possibly using the older type of bronze planchets, to include one cent coins in Mint sets and Proof sets sold to the public in future years until the supply of planchets is exhausted."

They did make a recommendation that I think many would want:

"CCAC recommends the production of gold coins reminiscent of the $2 1/2 gold Indian Head Quarter Eagle, $5 Indian Head Half Eagle, the $10 gold Indian Head Eagle and the $20 gold Saint-Gaudens Double Eagle, all of
which were introduced for circulation in 1907 and 1908. This recommendation includes new wording on the edge of the coins and producing them on the same 22K (.9167 fine) planchets as the American Gold Eagle bullion coins."

Comments

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Because people want to carry more weight

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • HalfDimeHalfDime Posts: 706 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Because people want to carry more weight

    You mean like gold coins too?

  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Because people want to carry more weight

    Very true. It's really about convenience people. It's about a quick transaction, it's about technology and the ease of use.

    Coins and Bill's lose on this issue. I'm not saying cash is dead or even dying, but more coins at higher denoms are an answer to a question nobody is asking.

  • jacrispiesjacrispies Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @HalfDime said:
    "CCAC recommends the production of gold coins reminiscent of the $2 1/2 gold Indian Head Quarter Eagle, $5 Indian Head Half Eagle, the $10 gold Indian Head Eagle and the $20 gold Saint-Gaudens Double Eagle, all of
    which were introduced for circulation in 1907 and 1908. This recommendation includes new wording on the edge of the coins and producing them on the same 22K (.9167 fine) planchets as the American Gold Eagle bullion coins."

    How creative........ :|

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
    BHNC #AN-10
    JRCS #1606

  • olympicsosolympicsos Posts: 934 ✭✭✭✭

    I disagree, when you have transit agency vending machines such as OMNY in NYC not dispensing dollar coins due to consumer preference, when you have the GAO saying that replacing the dollar bills with coins will cost more than keeping the bills, there is no need for higher denomination coins. What I would do is since the penny is not being made for circulation, have congress pass a law giving broad authority to mint half cent, large cent and two cent coins with a minimum copper content of 95%, just like the broad authority they have with the gold and platinum coins. This way there's no need to have a new dollar coin program, there's no need to have constant new designs on circulating coins every year, there's no need for the comic art coins to be made in gold, you can reissue old cent designs, there is no need for an American Liberty gold coin program as it could be made more accessible to all in copper. Gold and silver prices are through the roof and since the dollar coins are made in mostly copper anyway and made only for collectors, might as well revive a historical denomination. Mind you the gold dollars have their place like how they did a gold Sacagawea dollar this year, but there's a real opportunity to revive old denominations and stick to the KISS principle with circulating coins.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    We've been sold the same line about high value coins since the Ike dollar and none of the issues were widely used.

    As I understand it, high value coins (one dollar and above) were never particularly popular in the US.

    Add to that the fact that coins and currency are supposedly in decline, with credit/debit cards and various electronic payments predominating.

  • WCCWCC Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Because people want to carry more weight

    This is why I don't want to eliminate $1 FRNs.

  • The_Dinosaur_ManThe_Dinosaur_Man Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A $10 coin might be a stretch right now, but perhaps the Mint could produce the new types for sets, rolls, and bags, maybe another Cheerios promotion.

    Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
    Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
    https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.

  • Alpha2814Alpha2814 Posts: 224 ✭✭✭

    @HalfDime said:
    They did make a recommendation that I think many would want:

    "CCAC recommends the production of gold coins ... on the same 22K (.9167 fine) planchets as the American Gold Eagle bullion coins."

    24K/999 or nothing.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,072 ✭✭✭✭✭

    High value coins is a bad idea people don't like the current $1 coins and they will not like or use higher value coins either.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Same complaint by people about half dollars, yet one half dollar weighs the same as two quarters. Yet people have no complaint about the weight of two quarters in their pocket.

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • epcepc Posts: 337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    22K gold coins in any reasonable denomination would be pretty small at this point.

    Collector of Liberty Seated Half Dimes, including die pairs and die states

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @fathom said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Because people want to carry more weight

    Very true. It's really about convenience people. It's about a quick transaction, it's about technology and the ease of use.

    Coins and Bill's lose on this issue. I'm not saying cash is dead or even dying, but more coins at higher denoms are an answer to a question nobody is asking.

    It's definitely dying. The statistics show that.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @privatecoin said:
    Same complaint by people about half dollars, yet one half dollar weighs the same as two quarters. Yet people have no complaint about the weight of two quarters in their pocket.

    Actually, they do. Most people don't carry any change

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Do we really need a $2 coin when we barely use $2 bills? I mean, I do, but the majority of people don't.

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,536 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lots of folks use a credit or debit card to pay for everything. This will only make the problem worse.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This would just create confusion. A guy yesterday called me about a "John Adams" coin that he found in change at work. He saw some dates from the 18th century that he thought made it worth something beyond face value. The US mint has created unending fragmentation with all their based metal modern issues, we don't need more of this with people who seldom read books nor do real research.

  • johnnybjohnnyb Posts: 72 ✭✭✭

    I’d love to see more circulation of a $50 instrument (coin or note). With inflation, you need $50 to fill a tank of gas or cover most purchases. Honestly, we probably need a government study (agh!) on what denominations are appropriate. A $100 bill today isn’t what it was in 1971. We probably could use a $200 bill, but would a $500 or $1,000 bill work? As for coins, would a $2, $5, $10, $20 coin reduce the cost of paper bills? We need the government to do some work and tell us what denominations would help us, then get to work and make them happen!

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,398 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @fathom said:
    Very true. It's really about convenience people. It's about a quick transaction, it's about technology and the ease of use.

    Coins and Bill's lose on this issue...

    Are you sure? I stop at the mini-mart for a soft drink now and then and pay with cash. Often, I pay while the customer ahead of me at the counter is still fussing with their credit/debit card. There's no way anyone paying with plastic can be that quick. :)

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:

    @fathom said:
    Very true. It's really about convenience people. It's about a quick transaction, it's about technology and the ease of use.

    Coins and Bill's lose on this issue...

    Are you sure? I stop at the mini-mart for a soft drink now and then and pay with cash. Often, I pay while the customer ahead of me at the counter is still fussing with their credit/debit card. There's no way anyone paying with plastic can be that quick. :)

    Operator error. Lol

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnnyb said:
    I’d love to see more circulation of a $50 instrument (coin or note). With inflation, you need $50 to fill a tank of gas or cover most purchases. Honestly, we probably need a government study (agh!) on what denominations are appropriate. A $100 bill today isn’t what it was in 1971. We probably could use a $200 bill, but would a $500 or $1,000 bill work? As for coins, would a $2, $5, $10, $20 coin reduce the cost of paper bills? We need the government to do some work and tell us what denominations would help us, then get to work and make them happen!

    The lifetime of paper is quite long since they don't circulate as much. The most recent Treasury study didn't show any savings for $1 bills.

    Cashless is coming.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,398 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Most people understand cash, so "operator error" is not as likely (you just hand it to the clerk) as it is with plastic where depending on the store, there may be several different inputs needed on the card reader before the transaction is completed.

    This is, of course, ignoring the "McDonalds" scenario where the kid at the register is confused by half dollars and doesn't know how to make change. ;)

  • ShaunBC5ShaunBC5 Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just took the kids on a trip that 9hrs away by car and we did all the things (gas stations, restaurants, entertainment, doctors offices, grocery stores). I don’t use cash or coins once.
    Tomorrow we’ll go to a basketball tournament and I’ll use cash to get us in, buy some concessions, and one kid will leave a cash tip at a restaurant (required by coach).
    I don’t know of anyone looking for ways or reasons to use more cash or coin. I’m not ready for a cashless society, yet, but needing a coin purse on top of my phone/wallet/keys/sunglasses doesn’t sound appealing. My belt is already earning its keep and struggling mightily.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:
    Most people understand cash, so "operator error" is not as likely (you just hand it to the clerk) as it is with plastic where depending on the store, there may be several different inputs needed on the card reader before the transaction is completed.

    This is, of course, ignoring the "McDonalds" scenario where the kid at the register is confused by half dollars and doesn't know how to make change.

    I've seen more than my share of customers and clerks struggling to count change. LOL. Give me plastic any day, although I've also seen my share of people struggling to swipe a card or find a card with an available balance.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • olympicsosolympicsos Posts: 934 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 12, 2025 5:01AM

    The future of coins is commemoratives and bullion. Circulating coins, you revive old designs as a hook to get people into it as people like old coins

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Because people want to carry more weight

    This is why I don't want to eliminate $1 FRNs.

    Honestly they should not be eliminated. Given the cost of the nickel, I would reintroduce the half dime and also allow Thomas Jefferson to be fully ensconced on the $2 bill with a $2 Federal Reserve Note as it is now and a $2 United States Note with the Monticello reverse given that Virginia elected officials wanted Monticello to remain on the nickel but would be too small on half dime.

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @privatecoin said:
    Same complaint by people about half dollars, yet one half dollar weighs the same as two quarters. Yet people have no complaint about the weight of two quarters in their pocket.

    Actually, they do. Most people don't carry any change

    No they don't.

    5.67 grams x 2 =11.34. You act like those that don't carry them would be forced to. That is not the case. Sure, most don't carry change today, but there are those that do. The weight of a half dollar is not more than two quarters.


    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @fathom said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Because people want to carry more weight

    Very true. It's really about convenience people. It's about a quick transaction, it's about technology and the ease of use.

    Coins and Bill's lose on this issue. I'm not saying cash is dead or even dying, but more coins at higher denoms are an answer to a question nobody is asking.

    It's definitely dying. The statistics show that.

    Dying meaning foreseeable future. Our society is still facing hurdles including but not limited to the poor and unbanked, privacy issues, tech ssues or failures etc.

    Maybe down the road ...

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 12,224 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @fathom said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @fathom said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Because people want to carry more weight

    Very true. It's really about convenience people. It's about a quick transaction, it's about technology and the ease of use.

    Coins and Bill's lose on this issue. I'm not saying cash is dead or even dying, but more coins at higher denoms are an answer to a question nobody is asking.

    It's definitely dying. The statistics show that.

    Dying meaning foreseeable future. Our society is still facing hurdles including but not limited to the poor and unbanked, privacy issues, tech ssues or failures etc.

    Maybe down the road ...

    That's why I think ultimately they'll do a hybrid system where cash transactions will be limited to $20 or so, and anything over will be CBDC transactions that they can record.

  • GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,819 ✭✭✭✭

    @epc said:
    22K gold coins in any reasonable denomination would be pretty small at this point.

    Just for fun, I ran a thought through ChatGPT and it says a coin containing $1 worth of pure gold, at current spot prices, would have a diameter of approximately 0.594mm.

    I kinda get the push for coins in place of bills for longevity, but realistically, I see everything moving to all electronic at some point.

    imageimage

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,470 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Back to circulating coins and currency.

    Haven't been to Canada in a while, so not sure if they're doing it like New Zealand, but I suspect so.

    In NZ coins are 10c, 20c, 50c, $1 and $2

    As a side note, the currency I saw was $5, $10, $20 and $50's

    Everything is rounded up or down below 10c.

    I found it very easy for cash. I usually had a few coins (maybe up to $3 to $5 in 5 or 6 coins), and some bills. And although I used my card for anything of significance (gas, groceries, larger events, trips, lodging), I enjoyed using cash for everything else (eating out, coffees, snacks, small purchases). Very similar to how I am here in the States, but the coin side made a LOT more sense.

    It didn't feel like I was carrying any weight (less than I would here), and I didn't find it cumbersome at all.

    Getting away from quarters is always going to be a challenge for us as they are so ingrained in our not fully decimalized system, but going to a 10c, 25c, $1 and $2 coin system is doable. Drop the $1. and $2. bills.

    my 2c ... which ironically may not make sense in the next decade or two.


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,072 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @privatecoin said:
    Same complaint by people about half dollars, yet one half dollar weighs the same as two quarters. Yet people have no complaint about the weight of two quarters in their pocket.

    Except that vending machines and most automated coin acceptance systems will not accept half dollars. They are truly worthless for a great deal of commerce.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • 124Spider124Spider Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like having one- and two-dollar coins when visiting Canada, and one- and two-Euro coins in Europe. It matters less now than in the past (because credit cards are now generally taken even for small purchases.

  • RedStormRedStorm Posts: 257 ✭✭✭

    If there were coins of higher value I would use them as I think coins are a little easier to grab and pay with than having to pull out and sort through a wallet. Like many people though, I use a credit card for a lot of transactions. The big exception is small, locally owned businesses. They prefer cash to avoid paying cc transaction fees. Several local businesses in my area have signs requesting patrons pay with cash to help with their margins and I try to do that when I have enough cash on hand.

  • OnlyGoldIsMoneyOnlyGoldIsMoney Posts: 3,474 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 12, 2025 2:36PM
  • AcarrollAcarroll Posts: 54 ✭✭✭

    @johnnyb said:
    I’d love to see more circulation of a $50 instrument (coin or note). With inflation, you need $50 to fill a tank of gas or cover most purchases. Honestly, we probably need a government study (agh!) on what denominations are appropriate. A $100 bill today isn’t what it was in 1971. We probably could use a $200 bill, but would a $500 or $1,000 bill work? As for coins, would a $2, $5, $10, $20 coin reduce the cost of paper bills? We need the government to do some work and tell us what denominations would help us, then get to work and make them happen!

    A $500 bill would have close to the same purchasing power as a $100 bill had in 1971, so we could probably use one.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @privatecoin said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @privatecoin said:
    Same complaint by people about half dollars, yet one half dollar weighs the same as two quarters. Yet people have no complaint about the weight of two quarters in their pocket.

    Actually, they do. Most people don't carry any change

    No they don't.

    5.67 grams x 2 =11.34. You act like those that don't carry them would be forced to. That is not the case. Sure, most don't carry change today, but there are those that do. The weight of a half dollar is not more than two quarters.


    When did I suggest that some would be forced to carry change or that 2 quarters are different than a half dollar? I simply pointed out, and you agree, that most people don't carry change because of the weight.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,107 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow I remember back in the early 70s I had a 500$ bill folded up in my wallet.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ambro51 said:
    Wow I remember back in the early 70s I had a 500$ bill folded up in my wallet.

    Back around 1990, I had a lightly circulated $1000 bill which I thought was really neat. After the novelty wore off, I traded it to a coin dealer for two nice MS PCGS slabbed G$20 Saints. I think I made the right decision.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • RedStormRedStorm Posts: 257 ✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @privatecoin said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @privatecoin said:
    Same complaint by people about half dollars, yet one half dollar weighs the same as two quarters. Yet people have no complaint about the weight of two quarters in their pocket.

    Actually, they do. Most people don't carry any change

    No they don't.

    5.67 grams x 2 =11.34. You act like those that don't carry them would be forced to. That is not the case. Sure, most don't carry change today, but there are those that do. The weight of a half dollar is not more than two quarters.


    When did I suggest that some would be forced to carry change or that 2 quarters are different than a half dollar? I simply pointed out, and you agree, that most people don't carry change because of the weight.

    Not disagreeing with you because I’ve heard people say the same thing, “oh the weight!” Most of those same people however carry a bulky mobile phone in their pocket with no issues about the weight. A typical iPhone weighs about 200 grams or so which is about the same weight as 25 dollar coins!

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Assuming they actually circulated which is very doubtful, a $5 or $10 coin would be heavily counterfeited and put into circulation. They wouldn't fool an advanced coin collector but they would be plenty good enough to fool merchants and the general public. Think about the Henning counterfeit nickels.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • RedStormRedStorm Posts: 257 ✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    Assuming they actually circulated which is very doubtful, a $5 or $10 coin would be heavily counterfeited and put into circulation. They wouldn't fool an advanced coin collector but they would be plenty good enough to fool merchants and the general public. Think about the Henning counterfeit nickels.

    I was assuming for this fantasy discussion that $5 and $10 issues would mean their paper counterparts would be withdrawn, so these coins would widely circulate. I think these higher value US coins would have counterfeiting deterrents, like having bi-metallic rings, similar to the higher value coins like Canada’s $2 coin and EU’s 1 and 2 Euro.

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is simple. Paper notes and pushing credit cards on the populous by making cash customers pay more have caused a massive decrease in cash transactions. Obviously too deficit spending and high inflation have made existing circulating coinage irrelevant. The dollar coin would be relevant but banks won't issue them and the FED allows it.

    If we issue a $20 coin we'd be able to buy a few groceries or even a weeks supply with a few coins. Coins, copper or silver, do not carry germs and could make a massive difference in total number of fatalities in a real fast moving contagion.

    But all these points are likely to be ignored so long as the government wants reduced cash transactions. This isn't about politics it's current events and if you can't tell the difference then maybe YOU are too close to politics.

    I strongly support CCAC in this instance but less strongly support reissuance of old designs. The only reason people support reusing old designs is that we know in advance any design will be designed and administered by committee and it will satisfy no one, especially the artist. We got good designs in 1916 and lightning could strike again. Art has always been a thankless pursuit as everyone just ignores you until you're deceased. The best artists are lucky if they can even earn a living. This reflects poorly on culture. It's unfair to those who record the advance of civilization in media that people find relevant and beautiful.

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭✭

    500's and 1000's were common back in the old days. Not that I had many but people actually bought things like stoves, refrigerators, or even cars with cash. It wasn't so terribly unusual for houses to be settled with a few thousand dollar bills. Now if you try to buy small appliances with cash they treat you like a leper.

    We need cash to settle debts between real people but it doesn't seem to work in commerce any longer. Perhaps this will change.

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file