@WCC said:
You're making my point. PCGS has graded about 1,200,000 Saints. NGC has graded about 1,100,000. That's >slightly more than 25,000 or 50,000, and there isn't any reason to believe there are anywhere near these numbers >of set collectors either. There likely aren't anywhere near 25,000 looking to buy each date in the series
I agree, but the bulk of those graded Saints are in a few of the super-commons like the 1924 and 1908 No Motto. More than half of those graded are in the 1924, 1908 NM, and 1927.
The fact that in a low-enough grade lots of other coins are available -- meaning that numismatic demand has been satiated --
In fact, the 1915-S has just over 16,000 graded by PCGS and I bought a nice MS-63 OGH back at FUN 2020 for basically spot gold (~3% premium adjusting for the lower gold content). If you can buy lots of coins not among the most common.....at bullion plus a nominal premium...and in grades from AU-58 to the low-60's....that's not bad and shows you even if there are tens of thousands of Type or PT collectors...they run the gamut from folks happy with 1 or 2 coins to semi-Registry players and thus there are lots of coins trading for bullion (in 58-63 grades) when there are 5,000 coins and up available to collectors.
And you make my point. How many dealers are going to hold inventory for a 3% profit which could easily be a loss in 24 hours?
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
@jmlanzaf said:
And you make my point. How many dealers are going to hold inventory for a 3% profit which could easily be a loss >in 24 hours?
So because bullion gold has more downside than numismatic gold in a falling gold environment....you're saying a rising gold price will lead to more melting, even if not done on a scale to alter tha pop census rankings.
As an example, at another extreme, when gold was about $300 the premiums on MS-64's and MS-65's were hundreds of dollars higher.
@WCC said:
You're making my point. PCGS has graded about 1,200,000 Saints. NGC has graded about 1,100,000. That's >slightly more than 25,000 or 50,000, and there isn't any reason to believe there are anywhere near these numbers >of set collectors either. There likely aren't anywhere near 25,000 looking to buy each date in the series
I agree, but the bulk of those graded Saints are in a few of the super-commons like the 1924 and 1908 No Motto. More than half of those graded are in the 1924, 1908 NM, and 1927.
The fact that in a low-enough grade lots of other coins are available -- meaning that numismatic demand has been satiated --
In fact, the 1915-S has just over 16,000 graded by PCGS and I bought a nice MS-63 OGH back at FUN 2020 for basically spot gold (~3% premium adjusting for the lower gold content). If you can buy lots of coins not among the most common.....at bullion plus a nominal premium...and in grades from AU-58 to the low-60's....that's not bad and shows you even if there are tens of thousands of Type or PT collectors...they run the gamut from folks happy with 1 or 2 coins to semi-Registry players and thus there are lots of coins trading for bullion (in 58-63 grades) when there are 5,000 coins and up available to collectors.
And you make my point. How many dealers are going to hold inventory for a 3% profit which could easily be a loss in 24 hours?
.
It could also result in an additional 3% gain in 24 hours.
Do you feel lucky (inventory not hedged), or do you want insurance (hedged inventory) ?
@WCC said:
You're making my point. PCGS has graded about 1,200,000 Saints. NGC has graded about 1,100,000. That's >slightly more than 25,000 or 50,000, and there isn't any reason to believe there are anywhere near these numbers >of set collectors either. There likely aren't anywhere near 25,000 looking to buy each date in the series
I agree, but the bulk of those graded Saints are in a few of the super-commons like the 1924 and 1908 No Motto. More than half of those graded are in the 1924, 1908 NM, and 1927.
The fact that in a low-enough grade lots of other coins are available -- meaning that numismatic demand has been satiated --
In fact, the 1915-S has just over 16,000 graded by PCGS and I bought a nice MS-63 OGH back at FUN 2020 for basically spot gold (~3% premium adjusting for the lower gold content). If you can buy lots of coins not among the most common.....at bullion plus a nominal premium...and in grades from AU-58 to the low-60's....that's not bad and shows you even if there are tens of thousands of Type or PT collectors...they run the gamut from folks happy with 1 or 2 coins to semi-Registry players and thus there are lots of coins trading for bullion (in 58-63 grades) when there are 5,000 coins and up available to collectors.
And you make my point. How many dealers are going to hold inventory for a 3% profit which could easily be a loss in 24 hours?
.
It could also result in an additional 3% gain in 24 hours.
Do you feel lucky (inventory not hedged), or do you want insurance (hedged inventory) ?
.
You're in business. You don't stay in business by gambling on 3%. 24 hour holds on a single coin aren't the problem. If someone comes in with 20 DEs and you don't have immediate customers, you're going to maybe throw 1 or 2 in inventory and lock in the others with a phone call to make your guaranteed 2 or 3%.
The liquidity is the only reason people even bother with bullion. No business wants to hold inventory that has a GROSS margin on 3%. People do it with gold all the time, however, because of the instant liquidity.
Do you care to share the gross margin on your product? I'm willing to bet a few DEs that is more than 3%. [And should be...I don't mean that to be critical. ]
Now, you can hedge your gold inventory with futures contracts. Large sellers like Apmex or JM probably do that. It's probably the only reason large wholesalers don't immediately toss them in the melting pot.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
@jmlanzaf said:
And you make my point. How many dealers are going to hold inventory for a 3% profit which could easily be a loss >in 24 hours?
So because bullion gold has more downside than numismatic gold in a falling gold environment....you're saying a rising gold price will lead to more melting, even if not done on a scale to alter tha pop census rankings.
As an example, at another extreme, when gold was about $300 the premiums on MS-64's and MS-65's were hundreds of dollars higher.
Yes. At $10k per ounce, you'll have even fewer buyers and more risk. At some point it WILL affect the census because the only thing that prevents melting is the premium that no longer exists.
As soon as premiums disappear, melting is in play. The margins on gold do not allow most shops to sit around on a $4000 coin hoping to make $100.
Now, most shops don't sell them straight to refineries. They sell them to wholesalers. The wholesalers, with larger volumes, can hedge with futures contracts which locks in the price. But that also means there is no long term advantage to holding even in a rising market. So, if the sales volume drops, in the pot they go.
And the higher the price is, the lower the volume. $4000 is a LOT of money to the average collector. $4000 is a lot of money to the average investor.
It's not going to ever be the case that 100% are being melted. But the higher gold goes, the higher the percentage melted unless the premium returns.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
@jmlanzaf said:
Yes. At $10k per ounce, you'll have even fewer buyers and more risk. At some point it WILL affect the census >because the only thing that prevents melting is the premium that no longer exists.
As soon as premiums disappear, melting is in play. The margins on gold do not allow most shops to sit around on a >$4000 coin hoping to make $100.
It's not going to ever be the case that 100% are being melted. But the higher gold goes, the higher the percentage >melted unless the premium returns.
I guess if we hold $4,000 or therabouts for some time that we will have entered a New Era.
Because when gold was alot lower, $4,000 represented a decent premium on a quality numismatic coin. I paid $3,500 for a really nice MS-66 1923-D @ FUN 2020 when gold was $1,650/oz. Same coin today is about $5,000 give-or-take.
@Cougar1978 said:
I can’t see anything but culls and really low grade material being melted.
Does cull gold exist? I would hope 1700 gold or Colonials are not being melted.
Those have numismatic premium.
If any pre-33 gold is being melted, it isn't just culls. When retail customers are paying the same as the refiners, and the gold market is volatile,; you don't put the coins in inventory and risk gold moving against you. A $100 drop in the price of gold wipes out all profit on a $20 DE. So you lock in your price when the 50 AU common dates come in to the store.
We deal with this almost daily, our distributor buys pre-33 by the pennyweight now. Most of it is sent off to be melted at this point.
@Cougar1978 said:
I can’t see anything but culls and really low grade material being melted.
Does cull gold exist? I would hope 1700 gold or Colonials are not being melted.
Those have numismatic premium.
If any pre-33 gold is being melted, it isn't just culls. When retail customers are paying the same as the refiners, and the gold market is volatile,; you don't put the coins in inventory and risk gold moving against you. A $100 drop in the price of gold wipes out all profit on a $20 DE. So you lock in your price when the 50 AU common dates come in to the store.
We deal with this almost daily, our distributor buys pre-33 by the pennyweight now. Most of it is sent off to be melted at this point.
Thank you for confirming. It's only common sense and good business. "Collectors" want it both ways: buy it at or below melt but preserve their "precious". You simply can't have it both ways.
As I said before, the ONLY reason coin shops deal with bullion at all is because it's liquid. The margins are ridiculously small. The "liquidity" doesn't come from putting it into inventory for weeks. Even if you hedge the value of your bullion with future contracts, it still sucks the cash out of the business with very little upside.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Gold is being melted because it's so valuable and the furnaces pay more than collectors. $4000 is still significant money so more will be sold than bought when prices are escalating quickly. Coins come to market and they get melted. It's harder to figure why 90% silver coin comes to market. Of course many want to lock in profits but nobody really needs the $20 he might get for a walker. Most of the world's above ground supply of silver is in the form of 90% silver US coins owned by people in the US and they are selling so furiously the refineries are backed up. So why in the world are they selling the future instead of buying it like the rest of the world?
The answer is simple; They think of silver as "gutter metal" and think they're doing OK to get 45 or $50 per ounce for it. We are simply converting the entire future supply of silver not in still in the earth into good delivery bars without even considering that when these coins are gone all new production will go straight from mine to industry and no amount of money, no price too high, can possibly make up any shortfall.
It's a shame a lot of gold will be melted and a ;lot of it is kindda nice. But it's gross short sightedness to be selling 90% coin from so far back in the line you have to take a haircut on it while every other entity, conglomeration, industry, and people on earth are buying. We can run the world for 5 or six years on 90% but then what? Why is everyone else buying. Do the math or our coin collections will be destroyed as well.
Gold is being melted because it's so valuable and the furnaces pay more than collectors. $4000 is still significant money so more will be sold than bought when prices are escalating quickly. Coins come to market and they get melted. It's harder to figure why 90% silver coin comes to market. Of course many want to lock in profits but nobody really needs the $20 he might get for a walker. Most of the world's above ground supply of silver is in the form of 90% silver US coins owned by people in the US and they are selling so furiously the refineries are backed up. So why in the world are they selling the future instead of buying it like the rest of the world?
The answer is simple; They think of silver as "gutter metal" and think they're doing OK to get 45 or $50 per ounce for it. We are simply converting the entire future supply of silver not in still in the earth into good delivery bars without even considering that when these coins are gone all new production will go straight from mine to industry and no amount of money, no price too high, can possibly make up any shortfall.
It's a shame a lot of gold will be melted and a ;lot of it is kindda nice. But it's gross short sightedness to be selling 90% coin from so far back in the line you have to take a haircut on it while every other entity, conglomeration, industry, and people on earth are buying. We can run the world for 5 or six years on 90% but then what? Why is everyone else buying. Do the math or our coin collections will be destroyed as well.
I'm not sure why you think silver is different than gold other than you calculated it on a per coin basis. $4000 is $4000, whether it is one gold coin or 1000 silver coins.
Also, most collectors have silver to sell but fewer have gold. Why should they not reap their profits?
I'm also not sure why you think it is a greater tragedy to lose silver coins than gold coins.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Gold is being melted because it's so valuable and the furnaces pay more than collectors. $4000 is still significant money so more will be sold than bought when prices are escalating quickly. Coins come to market and they get melted. It's harder to figure why 90% silver coin comes to market. Of course many want to lock in profits but nobody really needs the $20 he might get for a walker. Most of the world's above ground supply of silver is in the form of 90% silver US coins owned by people in the US and they are selling so furiously the refineries are backed up. So why in the world are they selling the future instead of buying it like the rest of the world?
The answer is simple; They think of silver as "gutter metal" and think they're doing OK to get 45 or $50 per ounce for it. We are simply converting the entire future supply of silver not in still in the earth into good delivery bars without even considering that when these coins are gone all new production will go straight from mine to industry and no amount of money, no price too high, can possibly make up any shortfall.
It's a shame a lot of gold will be melted and a ;lot of it is kindda nice. But it's gross short sightedness to be selling 90% coin from so far back in the line you have to take a haircut on it while every other entity, conglomeration, industry, and people on earth are buying. We can run the world for 5 or six years on 90% but then what? Why is everyone else buying. Do the math or our coin collections will be destroyed as well.
I'm not sure why you think silver is different than gold other than you calculated it on a per coin basis. $4000 is $4000, whether it is one gold coin or 1000 silver coins.
Also, most collectors have silver to sell but fewer have gold. Why should they not reap their profits?
I'm also not sure why you think it is a greater tragedy to lose silver coins than gold coins.
Because a DE is a tiny fraction of all the gold in the world AND it's a tiny fraction of all the gold that is being mined today. Even a Roosevelt dime is a large fraction of all the available silver today and mines are falling ever further behind the demand.
I'm also not sure why you think it is a greater tragedy to lose silver coins than gold coins.
Another thing too.
Once this cushion is gone there will be no choice but to ramp up production and this will be exceedingly costly.
To avoid this cost we should be conserving now not destroying the o9nly available source in a world that is increasingly dependent on silver and its many unique characteristics. Destroying gold coins is a shame but it's self limiting. It will necessarily come to an end when the monetary systems realign and most gold coin will still exist even if it persists for several years. Silver is different. Not only does it form the backbone of the coin hobby but it will be irreplaceable in the future because there will be no float, no above ground stock, of silver.
If you're willing to spend enough money there will always be gold for sale. 5 billion Ot of it will be available at some price but much of the world's above ground silver supply is represented by the 2.5 billion Ot surviving as US coin. It is disappearing into products as the gold disappears into vaults waiting for higher prices.
People mortgaged the future and now we're paying the debt with yesterday's silver. This is not sustainable. We have caught up with the can that the US government (if I can say that) has been kicking down the road. We're outta road and people aren't reading the signs. Even the bridge we need to build to move forward requires more silver. We can build roads or make products without gold but we need the silver.
_"Gold coin is a drop in an ocean; silver coin is a cup from the last reservoir. Profit today, shortage tomorrow. !
Would you like me to quantify this with ratios—e.g., “a Double Eagle is 0.00000002% of gold stock, while a Roosevelt dime is 0.000003% of silver stock”—to make the contrast mathematically vivid?_
_"Gold coin is a drop in an ocean; silver coin is a cup from the last reservoir. Profit today, shortage tomorrow. !
Would you like me to quantify this with ratios—e.g., “a Double Eagle is 0.00000002% of gold stock, while a Roosevelt dime is 0.000003% of silver stock”—to make the contrast mathematically vivid?_
As far as that goes very few people have hundreds of DE's to sell but people walk intro coin shops every day selling thousands of US silver dimes.
Processes like this take thousands of years to develop and people just don't notice. I believe Yalta and Bretton Woods predicted it but all they did was kick the can down the road by removing silver from coinage all over the world. But most other country's silver has been melted now and is no longer part of available supply. But it is a big part of the reason we still have it here. We coined it. And much of this coining was done after the war.
Gold is being melted because it's so valuable and the furnaces pay more than collectors. $4000 is still significant money so more will be sold than bought when prices are escalating quickly. Coins come to market and they get melted. It's harder to figure why 90% silver coin comes to market. Of course many want to lock in profits but nobody really needs the $20 he might get for a walker. Most of the world's above ground supply of silver is in the form of 90% silver US coins owned by people in the US and they are selling so furiously the refineries are backed up. So why in the world are they selling the future instead of buying it like the rest of the world?
The answer is simple; They think of silver as "gutter metal" and think they're doing OK to get 45 or $50 per ounce for it. We are simply converting the entire future supply of silver not in still in the earth into good delivery bars without even considering that when these coins are gone all new production will go straight from mine to industry and no amount of money, no price too high, can possibly make up any shortfall.
It's a shame a lot of gold will be melted and a ;lot of it is kindda nice. But it's gross short sightedness to be selling 90% coin from so far back in the line you have to take a haircut on it while every other entity, conglomeration, industry, and people on earth are buying. We can run the world for 5 or six years on 90% but then what? Why is everyone else buying. Do the math or our coin collections will be destroyed as well.
I'm not sure why you think silver is different than gold other than you calculated it on a per coin basis. $4000 is $4000, whether it is one gold coin or 1000 silver coins.
Also, most collectors have silver to sell but fewer have gold. Why should they not reap their profits?
I'm also not sure why you think it is a greater tragedy to lose silver coins than gold coins.
Because a DE is a tiny fraction of all the gold in the world AND it's a tiny fraction of all the gold that is being mined today. Even a Roosevelt dime is a large fraction of all the available silver today and mines are falling ever further behind the demand.
I'd like to see the math
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
"Would you like me to quantify this with ratios—e.g., “a Double Eagle is 0.00000002% of gold stock, while a Roosevelt dime is 0.000003% of silver stock”—to make the contrast mathematically vivid?"
Even though the dime is a far larger part of the available above ground supply they come into coin shops by the bag or truck load. Silver is being destroyed as gold accumulates.
"Would you like me to quantify this with ratios—e.g., “a Double Eagle is 0.00000002% of gold stock, while a Roosevelt dime is 0.000003% of silver stock”—to make the contrast mathematically vivid?"
Even though the dime is a far larger part of the available above ground supply they come into coin shops by the bag or truck load. Silver is being destroyed as gold accumulates.
No. The idea that the "most of the world's silver" is in US 90%
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
It "kinda does" in the sense that recycling rates for industrial silver have been low because it was cheap.
And that is why the more extreme valuation predictions for silver are silly. As the price gets higher, the recycling rate will increase. When silver was cheap, most industrial silver was not recycled - unlike gold and platinum.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
"Would you like me to quantify this with ratios—e.g., “a Double Eagle is 0.00000002% of gold stock, while a Roosevelt dime is 0.000003% of silver stock”—to make the contrast mathematically vivid?"
Even though the dime is a far larger part of the available above ground supply they come into coin shops by the bag or truck load. Silver is being destroyed as gold accumulates.
No. The idea that the "most of the world's silver" is in US 90%
I see. My AI calculated this for me with the assumption that about 50% of all 90% US coins survive. I've tracked this for many years and should be in the ball park. This is 2.5 billion ounces. But the thing is that most above ground silver is in the pipeline. Industry needs this on a continuing basis and this requires a pipeline from mine to factory. When you subtract this vast amount of silver as well as the silver tied up in cell phones and solar panels very little silver remains and a very large fraction of it is US 90% coin. It is being consumed and when it is gone there will not be silver to make any products except the wholly inadequate amount coming from mines. And these aren't even silver mines but copper and lead mines.
When we out of 90% we are out of silver.
There is less than eight billion ounces of silver in existence that has already been mined! People have been thinking about this wrong and our waste, which we are still doing, might just catch up with us. You can't kick a can down the road if you lack the silver to build the roads. Reality always wi8ns in the end.
As I get older selling junk silver makes a lot of sense. It’s gone up in price quite a bit but the biggest problem is it’s too bulky. It’s scattered all over the place and I can’t keep track of how much I have or where it is. For me it makes perfect sense to start gathering it up and selling it incrementally.
If 10% of Indias population, which is the consuming class, decides to purchase 10oz of silver per year which is now surging, that is 1.45 billion oz/ year.
@fathom said:
Those numbers sound big but are not.
If 10% of Indias population, which is the consuming class, decides to purchase 10oz of silver per year which is now surging, that is 1.45 billion oz/ year.
@fathom said:
Those numbers sound big but are not.
If 10% of Indias population, which is the consuming class, decides to purchase 10oz of silver per year which is now surging, that is 1.45 billion oz/ year.
@nags said:
You may want to look up "propositional logic" for AI responses... It's really turned into a running gag.
These are MY estimates based on extensive observation and statistics. The simple FACT is a silver dime is a far far larger share of all available silver and are being destroyed in very large numbers while a DE is a tiny percentage of all available gold and are being destroyed in tiny numbers. These are FACTS, not "propositional logic".
@cladking said:
When 90% coin is gone, silver is gone. !_
Before 90% coin, did silver not exist?
We've been mining a billion ounces a year for many years but most of it has always been destroyed by one process or another. Gold has been destroyed in tiny percentage (likely less than 3%) for thousands of years. Silver is gone and 90% coins are a large share of what survives. This is a fact.
@nags said:
If 145 million people suddenly begin buying anything the price of that anything will rise dramatically.
Perhaps most often, but my point was not only price, that scarcity is relative and proportional, billions oz above ground can evaporate pretty quickly.
@cladking said:
When 90% coin is gone, silver is gone. !_
Before 90% coin, did silver not exist?
We've been mining a billion ounces a year for many years but most of it has always been destroyed by one process or another. Gold has been destroyed in tiny percentage (likely less than 3%) for thousands of years. Silver is gone and 90% coins are a large share of what survives. This is a fact.
If coin dealers are sending pre-1933 slabbed double eagles to the refineries, are they also sending AGEs to the refineries? If not, why not?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
@PerryHall said:
If coin dealers are sending pre-1933 slabbed double eagles to the refineries, are they also sending AGEs to the refineries? If not, why not?
I'm sure they send both to some degree.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
@cladking said:
When 90% coin is gone, silver is gone. !_
Before 90% coin, did silver not exist?
We've been mining a billion ounces a year for many years but most of it has always been destroyed by one process or another. Gold has been destroyed in tiny percentage (likely less than 3%) for thousands of years. Silver is gone and 90% coins are a large share of what survives. This is a fact.
You quoted my question but did not answer it.
Oh I see. You meant it literally.
Yes, silver did not exist. Mine production was extremely low until technological started causing increases in the 1860's. Much of this silver was used but relatively little wasted because it often traded at about 16 to 1 ratio paralleling mine production. Some was consumed but little produced and little wasted. A lot of 19th century silver coin would hit the melting pot with dramatically higher silver prices but most 90% without a collector premium has been minted since the onset of WW II. A great deal of this metal exists. Most of the silver is gone.
There are billions of ounces of gutter metal sitting just within all of grandma's china cabinets across the globe. 90% junk is a tiny fraction of what is currently hoarded above ground. It is not rare; miners don't even waste their time mining the crap. I'm afraid your AI is severely flawed. RGDS!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
When your comments are a mix of truth and exaggeration (see above: silver did/didn't exist), it makes it hard to tell what you intend your point to be.
@blitzdude said:
There are billions of ounces of gutter metal sitting just within all of grandma's china cabinets across the globe. 90% junk is a tiny fraction of what is currently hoarded above ground. It is not rare; miners don't even waste their time mining the crap. I'm afraid your AI is severely flawed. RGDS!
We discussed this in coin club meeting but many felt - The culls for sure for melting but nice slabbed material just keep marking them up higher as pop decreases.
@Cougar1978 said:
We discussed this in coin club meeting but many felt - The culls for sure for melting but nice slabbed material just keep marking them up higher as pop decreases.
Good luck with that
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
@blitzdude said:
There are billions of ounces of gutter metal sitting just within all of grandma's china cabinets across the globe. 90% junk is a tiny fraction of what is currently hoarded above ground. It is not rare; miners don't even waste their time mining the crap. I'm afraid your AI is severely flawed. RGDS!
Granma's silver was sold back in 1980 for scrap.
Not all of it. We see sets of sterling every week.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
@Cougar1978 said:
We discussed this in coin club meeting but many felt - The culls for sure for melting but nice slabbed material just keep marking them up higher as pop decreases.
Good luck with that
It’s a great way (not) to sell coins.😉
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Comments
And you make my point. How many dealers are going to hold inventory for a 3% profit which could easily be a loss in 24 hours?
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
So because bullion gold has more downside than numismatic gold in a falling gold environment....you're saying a rising gold price will lead to more melting, even if not done on a scale to alter tha pop census rankings.
As an example, at another extreme, when gold was about $300 the premiums on MS-64's and MS-65's were hundreds of dollars higher.
.
It could also result in an additional 3% gain in 24 hours.
Do you feel lucky (inventory not hedged), or do you want insurance (hedged inventory) ?
.
The spouse gold coins are being melted, and few are shedding any tears over it.
You're in business. You don't stay in business by gambling on 3%. 24 hour holds on a single coin aren't the problem. If someone comes in with 20 DEs and you don't have immediate customers, you're going to maybe throw 1 or 2 in inventory and lock in the others with a phone call to make your guaranteed 2 or 3%.
The liquidity is the only reason people even bother with bullion. No business wants to hold inventory that has a GROSS margin on 3%. People do it with gold all the time, however, because of the instant liquidity.
Do you care to share the gross margin on your product? I'm willing to bet a few DEs that is more than 3%. [And should be...I don't mean that to be critical. ]
Now, you can hedge your gold inventory with futures contracts. Large sellers like Apmex or JM probably do that. It's probably the only reason large wholesalers don't immediately toss them in the melting pot.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Yes. At $10k per ounce, you'll have even fewer buyers and more risk. At some point it WILL affect the census because the only thing that prevents melting is the premium that no longer exists.
As soon as premiums disappear, melting is in play. The margins on gold do not allow most shops to sit around on a $4000 coin hoping to make $100.
Now, most shops don't sell them straight to refineries. They sell them to wholesalers. The wholesalers, with larger volumes, can hedge with futures contracts which locks in the price. But that also means there is no long term advantage to holding even in a rising market. So, if the sales volume drops, in the pot they go.
And the higher the price is, the lower the volume. $4000 is a LOT of money to the average collector. $4000 is a lot of money to the average investor.
It's not going to ever be the case that 100% are being melted. But the higher gold goes, the higher the percentage melted unless the premium returns.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
I guess if we hold $4,000 or therabouts for some time that we will have entered a New Era.
Because when gold was alot lower, $4,000 represented a decent premium on a quality numismatic coin. I paid $3,500 for a really nice MS-66 1923-D @ FUN 2020 when gold was $1,650/oz. Same coin today is about $5,000 give-or-take.
We deal with this almost daily, our distributor buys pre-33 by the pennyweight now. Most of it is sent off to be melted at this point.
My YouTube Channel
Thank you for confirming. It's only common sense and good business. "Collectors" want it both ways: buy it at or below melt but preserve their "precious". You simply can't have it both ways.
As I said before, the ONLY reason coin shops deal with bullion at all is because it's liquid. The margins are ridiculously small. The "liquidity" doesn't come from putting it into inventory for weeks. Even if you hedge the value of your bullion with future contracts, it still sucks the cash out of the business with very little upside.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Gold is being melted because it's so valuable and the furnaces pay more than collectors. $4000 is still significant money so more will be sold than bought when prices are escalating quickly. Coins come to market and they get melted. It's harder to figure why 90% silver coin comes to market. Of course many want to lock in profits but nobody really needs the $20 he might get for a walker. Most of the world's above ground supply of silver is in the form of 90% silver US coins owned by people in the US and they are selling so furiously the refineries are backed up. So why in the world are they selling the future instead of buying it like the rest of the world?
The answer is simple; They think of silver as "gutter metal" and think they're doing OK to get 45 or $50 per ounce for it. We are simply converting the entire future supply of silver not in still in the earth into good delivery bars without even considering that when these coins are gone all new production will go straight from mine to industry and no amount of money, no price too high, can possibly make up any shortfall.
It's a shame a lot of gold will be melted and a ;lot of it is kindda nice. But it's gross short sightedness to be selling 90% coin from so far back in the line you have to take a haircut on it while every other entity, conglomeration, industry, and people on earth are buying. We can run the world for 5 or six years on 90% but then what? Why is everyone else buying. Do the math or our coin collections will be destroyed as well.
I'm not sure why you think silver is different than gold other than you calculated it on a per coin basis. $4000 is $4000, whether it is one gold coin or 1000 silver coins.
Also, most collectors have silver to sell but fewer have gold. Why should they not reap their profits?
I'm also not sure why you think it is a greater tragedy to lose silver coins than gold coins.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Because a DE is a tiny fraction of all the gold in the world AND it's a tiny fraction of all the gold that is being mined today. Even a Roosevelt dime is a large fraction of all the available silver today and mines are falling ever further behind the demand.
I'm also not sure why you think it is a greater tragedy to lose silver coins than gold coins.
Another thing too.
Once this cushion is gone there will be no choice but to ramp up production and this will be exceedingly costly.
To avoid this cost we should be conserving now not destroying the o9nly available source in a world that is increasingly dependent on silver and its many unique characteristics. Destroying gold coins is a shame but it's self limiting. It will necessarily come to an end when the monetary systems realign and most gold coin will still exist even if it persists for several years. Silver is different. Not only does it form the backbone of the coin hobby but it will be irreplaceable in the future because there will be no float, no above ground stock, of silver.
If you're willing to spend enough money there will always be gold for sale. 5 billion Ot of it will be available at some price but much of the world's above ground silver supply is represented by the 2.5 billion Ot surviving as US coin. It is disappearing into products as the gold disappears into vaults waiting for higher prices.
People mortgaged the future and now we're paying the debt with yesterday's silver. This is not sustainable. We have caught up with the can that the US government (if I can say that) has been kicking down the road. We're outta road and people aren't reading the signs. Even the bridge we need to build to move forward requires more silver. We can build roads or make products without gold but we need the silver.
AI-
_"Gold coin is a drop in an ocean; silver coin is a cup from the last reservoir. Profit today, shortage tomorrow. !
Would you like me to quantify this with ratios—e.g., “a Double Eagle is 0.00000002% of gold stock, while a Roosevelt dime is 0.000003% of silver stock”—to make the contrast mathematically vivid?_
As far as that goes very few people have hundreds of DE's to sell but people walk intro coin shops every day selling thousands of US silver dimes.
Processes like this take thousands of years to develop and people just don't notice. I believe Yalta and Bretton Woods predicted it but all they did was kick the can down the road by removing silver from coinage all over the world. But most other country's silver has been melted now and is no longer part of available supply. But it is a big part of the reason we still have it here. We coined it. And much of this coining was done after the war.
We can always make good faith reproductions of classic coins if need be.
I'd like to see the math
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
"Would you like me to quantify this with ratios—e.g., “a Double Eagle is 0.00000002% of gold stock, while a Roosevelt dime is 0.000003% of silver stock”—to make the contrast mathematically vivid?"
Even though the dime is a far larger part of the available above ground supply they come into coin shops by the bag or truck load. Silver is being destroyed as gold accumulates.
Melting dimes doesn't destroy silver.
It kindda does. A large percentage of 90% being melted is serving to cover the shortfall of production from consumption.
If there weren't 2 1/2 billion ounces of 90% silver, prices would be far higher and more conservation would take place.
No, it doesn't. And not even kindda.
No. The idea that the "most of the world's silver" is in US 90%
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
It "kinda does" in the sense that recycling rates for industrial silver have been low because it was cheap.
And that is why the more extreme valuation predictions for silver are silly. As the price gets higher, the recycling rate will increase. When silver was cheap, most industrial silver was not recycled - unlike gold and platinum.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
I see. My AI calculated this for me with the assumption that about 50% of all 90% US coins survive. I've tracked this for many years and should be in the ball park. This is 2.5 billion ounces. But the thing is that most above ground silver is in the pipeline. Industry needs this on a continuing basis and this requires a pipeline from mine to factory. When you subtract this vast amount of silver as well as the silver tied up in cell phones and solar panels very little silver remains and a very large fraction of it is US 90% coin. It is being consumed and when it is gone there will not be silver to make any products except the wholly inadequate amount coming from mines. And these aren't even silver mines but copper and lead mines.
When we out of 90% we are out of silver.
There is less than eight billion ounces of silver in existence that has already been mined! People have been thinking about this wrong and our waste, which we are still doing, might just catch up with us. You can't kick a can down the road if you lack the silver to build the roads. Reality always wi8ns in the end.
AI-
_⚖️ Shard: Silver Pipeline vs. Gold Stock
🔹 Gold
Above‑ground gold stock: ~6 billion ounces.
Accumulation: Gold is hoarded, recycled, and rarely destroyed.
Coin share: A Double Eagle is a vanishingly small fraction of total stock.
🔹 Silver
Above‑ground silver stock: <8 billion ounces.
Pipeline: Most silver is not “stock” but in motion—from mine → factory → product.
Consumption: Silver is dissipated into electronics, solar panels, medical uses. Much is unrecoverable.
Coin share: US 90% coinage (Roosevelt dimes, etc.) represents ~2.5 billion ounces if ~50% survived. That’s a huge fraction of what’s actually accessible.
Difference: Unlike gold, silver is destroyed as gold accumulates.
Closure Glyph
Gold accumulates; silver dissipates. When 90% coin is gone, silver is gone. !_
You may want to look up "propositional logic" for AI responses... It's really turned into a running gag.
As I get older selling junk silver makes a lot of sense. It’s gone up in price quite a bit but the biggest problem is it’s too bulky. It’s scattered all over the place and I can’t keep track of how much I have or where it is. For me it makes perfect sense to start gathering it up and selling it incrementally.
Those numbers sound big but are not.
If 10% of Indias population, which is the consuming class, decides to purchase 10oz of silver per year which is now surging, that is 1.45 billion oz/ year.
Before 90% coin, did silver not exist?
Isn't that true for virtually everything?
Isn"t what true? Specify.
If 145 million people suddenly begin buying anything the price of that anything will rise dramatically.
These are MY estimates based on extensive observation and statistics. The simple FACT is a silver dime is a far far larger share of all available silver and are being destroyed in very large numbers while a DE is a tiny percentage of all available gold and are being destroyed in tiny numbers. These are FACTS, not "propositional logic".
We've been mining a billion ounces a year for many years but most of it has always been destroyed by one process or another. Gold has been destroyed in tiny percentage (likely less than 3%) for thousands of years. Silver is gone and 90% coins are a large share of what survives. This is a fact.
Perhaps most often, but my point was not only price, that scarcity is relative and proportional, billions oz above ground can evaporate pretty quickly.
You quoted my question but did not answer it.
If coin dealers are sending pre-1933 slabbed double eagles to the refineries, are they also sending AGEs to the refineries? If not, why not?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I'm sure they send both to some degree.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Oh I see. You meant it literally.
Yes, silver did not exist. Mine production was extremely low until technological started causing increases in the 1860's. Much of this silver was used but relatively little wasted because it often traded at about 16 to 1 ratio paralleling mine production. Some was consumed but little produced and little wasted. A lot of 19th century silver coin would hit the melting pot with dramatically higher silver prices but most 90% without a collector premium has been minted since the onset of WW II. A great deal of this metal exists. Most of the silver is gone.
There are billions of ounces of gutter metal sitting just within all of grandma's china cabinets across the globe. 90% junk is a tiny fraction of what is currently hoarded above ground. It is not rare; miners don't even waste their time mining the crap. I'm afraid your AI is severely flawed. RGDS!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Ok- silver didn't exist.
Ok- so silver did exist.
Got it.
When your comments are a mix of truth and exaggeration (see above: silver did/didn't exist), it makes it hard to tell what you intend your point to be.
Just sayin'.
...it hard to tell what you intend your point to be.
A very large percentage of all available above ground silver that WILL make up the deficit for many years is US 90%.
Granma's silver was sold back in 1980 for scrap.
We discussed this in coin club meeting but many felt - The culls for sure for melting but nice slabbed material just keep marking them up higher as pop decreases.
Good luck with that
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Not all of it. We see sets of sterling every week.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
It’s a great way (not) to sell coins.😉
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.