Home U.S. Coin Forum

1959-D Cent - Grading Help

I sent this 1959-D in to get graded and it came back MS-66. Can someone critique this one and help me see where I went wrong thinking it would come back a bit higher.

Comments

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,451 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Marks are apparent in the left obverse field behind Lincoln’s head and on portions of both sides of reverse steps.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,837 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Shoulder marks are pretty rough. Would be glad of the grade.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • dipset512dipset512 Posts: 143 ✭✭✭

    Thanks! This helps me for in the future.

  • Coins3675Coins3675 Posts: 921 ✭✭✭✭

    I wouldn't have gotten that graded.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,835 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Don't waste your money having ultra common date coins graded in the hope you will score a top-pop. You are far more likely to just strike out. Your 1959-D is strike one.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • dipset512dipset512 Posts: 143 ✭✭✭
    edited November 18, 2025 6:58AM

    @291fifth said:
    Don't waste your money having ultra common date coins graded in the hope you will score a top-pop. You are far more likely to just strike out. Your 1959-D is strike one.

    Not the intent. To Learn. I'll throw in a coin with a batch of others that I know is used as a learning tool.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,835 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dipset512 said:

    @291fifth said:
    Don't waste your money having ultra common date coins graded in the hope you will score a top-pop. You are far more likely to just strike out. Your 1959-D is strike one.

    Not the intent. To Learn. I'll throw in a coin with a batch of others that I know is used as a learning tool.

    All you are really learning is that on the day your coin was graded someone thought it was the assigned grade. In the world of ultra-high grade moderns the same coin on another day or with a different grader could easily be graded differently. It really isn't a "learning tool" it is just a waste of money (my opinion, which is free).

    All glory is fleeting.
  • dipset512dipset512 Posts: 143 ✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:

    @dipset512 said:

    @291fifth said:
    Don't waste your money having ultra common date coins graded in the hope you will score a top-pop. You are far more likely to just strike out. Your 1959-D is strike one.

    Not the intent. To Learn. I'll throw in a coin with a batch of others that I know is used as a learning tool.

    All you are really learning is that on the day your coin was graded someone thought it was the assigned grade. In the world of ultra-high grade moderns the same coin on another day or with a different grader could easily be graded differently. It really isn't a "learning tool" it is just a waste of money (my opinion, which is free).

    Sure. Thanks for your response.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd be happey to get the MS-66. At least in the good old days, these coins had to flow on water to make more than MS-66.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Clackamas1Clackamas1 Posts: 1,661 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Its a classic 66RD. That is a tough date and hard to find like that. As others have stated the hits did you in. The chatter on the memorial steps do as well.

  • yspsalesyspsales Posts: 2,636 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What did you expect?

    Are you having fun?

    Your eye is 1.5 points off the grader.

    Keep grinding with that in mind.

    BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out

  • dipset512dipset512 Posts: 143 ✭✭✭
    edited November 18, 2025 3:19PM

    @yspsales said:
    What did you expect?

    Are you having fun?

    Your eye is 1.5 points off the grader.

    Keep grinding with that in mind.

    I was thinking MS-67. This is me looking at a bunch from CoinFacts & Auction results. I haven't seen any in hand though. Fun - Of Course! Thanks for the tip.

  • DRUNNERDRUNNER Posts: 3,921 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Keep enjoying the thrill of submission . . . . your eye is solid but the task of getting a 67 on that era of Lincoln is daunting. There is good, if sometimes abrupt advice above, from solid numismatists. Your attitude seems perfect for the long haul . . .

    Drunner

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dipset512 said:

    @291fifth said:

    @dipset512 said:

    @291fifth said:
    Don't waste your money having ultra common date coins graded in the hope you will score a top-pop. You are far more likely to just strike out. Your 1959-D is strike one.

    Not the intent. To Learn. I'll throw in a coin with a batch of others that I know is used as a learning tool.

    All you are really learning is that on the day your coin was graded someone thought it was the assigned grade. In the world of ultra-high grade moderns the same coin on another day or with a different grader could easily be graded differently. It really isn't a "learning tool" it is just a waste of money (my opinion, which is free).

    Sure. Thanks for your response.

    Well done at not taking the bait. Pretty uncommon around here.

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,022 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is a really nice coin for the year/mint with a nice full strike. The rev is what really held it back imo, the marks in the left obv field are borderline but the rev with the marks (or stains) around the memorial and general busyness of small nicks and ticks is why it didn't grade higher. Another day, another grader/TPG who knows it might get into a 67 holder someday.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,451 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Aotearoa said:

    @dipset512 said:

    @291fifth said:

    @dipset512 said:

    @291fifth said:
    Don't waste your money having ultra common date coins graded in the hope you will score a top-pop. You are far more likely to just strike out. Your 1959-D is strike one.

    Not the intent. To Learn. I'll throw in a coin with a batch of others that I know is used as a learning tool.

    All you are really learning is that on the day your coin was graded someone thought it was the assigned grade. In the world of ultra-high grade moderns the same coin on another day or with a different grader could easily be graded differently. It really isn't a "learning tool" it is just a waste of money (my opinion, which is free).

    Sure. Thanks for your response.

    Well done at not taking the bait. Pretty uncommon around here.

    I don’t think there was any “bait” to take. The post was sensible and a good caution about a “learning tool”.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • dipset512dipset512 Posts: 143 ✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 6:07PM

    .

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 11:02PM

    :|

    Smitten with DBLCs.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file