So the dime weighs 2.5 and under scope has mecury dime markings the Kennedy half is a 90 percent silver 1966 and the 1993 is the reverse pics and a cool toned Wheatie
If you don't like the answers you get on that site or the answers you get here, then the only remaining choices are to pay for slabbing... which is also apparently the answer you've already gotten several times in email.
Isn't it nice when you get the same answers every time?
@Rarefinder2313 said:
Well byers said even if there foreign planchets they're still worth around 11 to 1400 so I found that pretty cool
You found that US coins on foreign planchets are worth $1100-1400?
That information may be cool.
If by that you mean "that you found US coins on foreign planchets worth $1100-1400", no, sorry, you didn't.
Anything else you'd like to be proven wrong on please inquire with me to show you.
I am absolutely delighted to be proven wrong on everything that I've ever said. Seriously. I have no ego tied up in whatever coin knowledge I've accumulated.. I learned it all from other people and reading.
However what you view as proof and what the rest of the coin collecting community views as proof are probably very very different.
Get whatever coin graded by a legitimate organization like PCGS, NGC, CACG, or ANACS and you will have proved me wrong. Just like every single email that you showed above said to do. Otherwise, you're just p***ing in the wind.
@MsMorrisine said:
extreme heat damage like from a fire
So I thought the same till.o overplayed it and pilloried it like 20 degrees clockwise that protruding aspect is the exact same fit as on the mecury dime
Its the top part of the wings on the obverse of the mecury dime
@Rarefinder2313 said:
So I thought the same till.o overplayed it and pilloried it like 20 degrees clockwise that protruding aspect is the exact same fit as on the mecury dime
So I thought the same till.o overplayed it and pilloried it like 20 degrees clockwise that protruding aspect is the exact same fit as on the mecury dime
there is no mercury dime in any of the photos above
the 1981-d dime is overweight if the scale is calibrated correctly
this applies for all the clad coins: just because you can't see the core on edge doesn't mean it's not clad. tis comes as years as a coin roll hunter
if you are convinced it is an error coin, the send it in under a grading teir plus the fee for error service. keep in mind it's your dime (double entendre pun intended)
@Rarefinder2313 said:
The quater is one of the few sms 64s I inherited
just because it is nice doesn't make it an sms quarter. some "really nice and different looking" coins were found from a former mint director at the time. they were examined and deemed "sms" despite no such set being issued to the public. you'd need to prove these are from the former mint director to say it is sms
@Rarefinder2313 said:
The quater is one of the few sms 64s I inherited
just because it is nice doesn't make it an sms quarter. some "really nice and different looking" coins were found from a former mint director at the time. they were examined and deemed "sms" despite no such set being issued to the public. you'd need to prove these are from the former mint director to say it is sms
My grandfather got em from his friend that worked for the us mint idk who the guy was im srry idk how I could prove that. Theres alot of coins in this box i wasngiven some are pretty weird lol to say the least.
Comments
So the dime weighs 2.5 and under scope has mecury dime markings the Kennedy half is a 90 percent silver 1966 and the 1993 is the reverse pics and a cool toned Wheatie
Also tested the dime it is also 90 percent silver
The quater is one of the few sms 64s I inherited
Got no idea of the 75 wht the error is or why it was cased trying to fegiure that out.
Smh...
No comment.
Send it in. You'll find out what it's worth.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Talked to a few people just trying to get a better idea as to wht to do with them
Like would they be worth grading im guessing the dime and 66 would be but the other's idnt think so
@Byers OP seems to respect your opinion, do you want to tell him the bad news?
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
I'll take em if u pay me
Proud follower of Christ!
Well byers said even if there foreign planchets they're still worth around 11 to 1400 so I found that pretty cool
https://www.coinflation.com/silver_coin_values.html
If you don't like the answers you get on that site or the answers you get here, then the only remaining choices are to pay for slabbing... which is also apparently the answer you've already gotten several times in email.
Isn't it nice when you get the same answers every time?
https://www.pcgs.com/servicesandfees
https://www.ngccoin.com/submit/services-fees/ngc/
Don't forget that you'll need to pay your membership fees, and postage and insurance both ways.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
mechanical doubling - no premium - value 1 cent
not a doubled die
not a doubled die
not a doubled die
not a doubled die
You found that US coins on foreign planchets are worth $1100-1400?
That information may be cool.
If by that you mean "that you found US coins on foreign planchets worth $1100-1400", no, sorry, you didn't.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
extreme heat damage like from a fire
you mean the above dime?
both those pictures of the same dime, right?
that pretty cool
Actually I did ill show you the email from pretty much one the best collectors ive come accross
Anything else you'd like to be proven wrong on please inquire with me to show you.
Points to the original poster for most ironic member name.
Yes the front and backs are the same dime and it came back 90 percent weighs 2.5 grams
it's hard to tell from the photo because it is pixelated and blurry
sometimes people put them in an air-tite because there is value, or perceived value, or sentimental value
I am absolutely delighted to be proven wrong on everything that I've ever said. Seriously. I have no ego tied up in whatever coin knowledge I've accumulated.. I learned it all from other people and reading.
However what you view as proof and what the rest of the coin collecting community views as proof are probably very very different.
Get whatever coin graded by a legitimate organization like PCGS, NGC, CACG, or ANACS and you will have proved me wrong. Just like every single email that you showed above said to do. Otherwise, you're just p***ing in the wind.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
So I thought the same till.o overplayed it and moved it like 20 degrees clockwise that protruding aspect is the exact same fit as on the mecury dime
Its the top part of the wings on the obverse of the mecury dime
All of your coins are about to get pilloried.
there is no mercury dime in any of the photos above
And? @Byers posts here often. I'm sure he'll pop by at some point.
What do your NGC inserts say???
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
the 1981-d dime is overweight if the scale is calibrated correctly
this applies for all the clad coins: just because you can't see the core on edge doesn't mean it's not clad. tis comes as years as a coin roll hunter
if you are convinced it is an error coin, the send it in under a grading teir plus the fee for error service. keep in mind it's your dime (double entendre pun intended)
Waste of time and effort OP.
Even seasoned roll searchers have a plan and knowledge.
Grab a Cherrypicker Guide and hit Ebay.
The deluded OP is the reason NGC and PCGS were created.
BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out
just because it is nice doesn't make it an sms quarter. some "really nice and different looking" coins were found from a former mint director at the time. they were examined and deemed "sms" despite no such set being issued to the public. you'd need to prove these are from the former mint director to say it is sms
are these for the same coin?
neither photo is good enough to give an opinion
I don't have a sigma
I would hope its rectangular indicator would show it's not pre-1900 90% silver
however, you won't convince me about it being 90%(not pre-1900 too) by not measuring it as 40% silver(if available)
i'd like to see a picture of that
the rest of the pictures, i can't tell what goes with what
Sure the photos are good enough to give an opinion. At the very least, the coin’s color looks questionable and it’s not worth getting graded.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
You've come to the right place. Some here will probably tell you what to do with them.
Reminds me of the old phrase" don't just sit there like a bump on a log". Now we have "a bump on a nose".
Will you tell us when the 1966 error half dollar comes across your desk in a shiny new slab? Pretty please!
Yess of course I'm sending them out very soon. Thank you to everyone who's commented on this post I really appreciate it.
My grandfather got em from his friend that worked for the us mint idk who the guy was im srry idk how I could prove that. Theres alot of coins in this box i wasngiven some are pretty weird lol to say the least.
Out where?