Mystery SLQ

Options
Numismaphile
Numismaphile Posts: 70 ✭✭
edited September 21, 2025 3:50PM in U.S. Coin Forum



Trying to nail down this quarter. Obverse looks like type 1 1917-s 25 cents but reverse is type 2. It came in a collection with obvious fakes but this one looks more authentic to me. Curious what those of you with more experience think. Thank you.

Best Answer

Answers

  • TomB
    TomB Posts: 23,192 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    It doesn't look like a Type I obverse to me. Why do you think it looks like a Type I?

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • World67
    World67 Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Looks like a type 2. Why do you think it looks like a type 1.

  • Walkerfan
    Walkerfan Posts: 10,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    It looks like a type two obverse and reverse.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,052 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Morgan White said:
    Looks like a type 2. Why do you think it looks like a type 1.

    Pareidolia. Everything looks like a breast

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • pcgsregistrycollector
    pcgsregistrycollector Posts: 2,325 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    ty2

    Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • Russell12
    Russell12 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:
    Looks like a type 2. Why do you think it looks like a type 1.

    Pareidolia. Everything looks like a breast

    Are we still talking about coins?

  • JeffersonFrog
    JeffersonFrog Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Numismaphile As stated above, the coin is a T2. Perhaps because the chain mail is worn and the breast looks exposed, you thought it was a T1. There are other indicators, the branch leaf through L in Liberty, and the number of dots on the shield that clearly show it to be a T1. Hope this helps. I'm not an expert by any means, but your coin has some hints of luster remaining and looks authentic to me. Hope this helps.

    If we were all the same, the world would be an incredibly boring place.

    Tommy

  • 124Spider
    124Spider Posts: 1,270 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:
    Looks like a type 2. Why do you think it looks like a type 1.

    Pareidolia. Everything looks like a breast

    Best post of the decade!

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,052 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Morgan White said:

    @124Spider said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:
    Looks like a type 2. Why do you think it looks like a type 1.

    Pareidolia. Everything looks like a breast

    Best post of the decade!

    The decade being the 1980s...

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Numismaphile
    Options

    I guess I was imagining more breast than the rest of the world sees. Nothing new in that. Thank you for all your responses!

  • Coins3675
    Coins3675 Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Type 2

    Successful Transactions With: JWP, DBSTrader2, greencopper, bretsan, ajaan, Ted1, Desert Coin, olah_in_MA

  • Numismaphile
    Options

    Really, all I thought was that she was showing more cleavage than a 1918 girl would reveal. What else can I say, except that when I turned the coin around to get a good look from behind all I saw was this eagle.

  • 124Spider
    124Spider Posts: 1,270 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 18, 2026 10:48AM
    Options

    She's just having a wardrobe malfunction. :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file