Home U.S. Coin Forum

Seated Liberty Half Dollars - which date is the best to own?

Now I know this is a loaded question with many many opinions and circumstances, but was just curious to the answers and reasons why?

So…. My question:

(Other than the 53-O NA and the 78-S) If you could only own/ keep/ purchase 1 date/ MM SLHD coin, which date would you choose to keep/ acquire? …and Why? Rarity? Survival rate? Scarcity? Condition rarity? Other?

Look forward to your feedback and answers to the question!!

Comments

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 4,173 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1853 Arrows and Rays is a popular classic.

    The 1839 No Drapery in VF-XF is a strong performer. So are the 1864 and 1865.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • seatedlib3991seatedlib3991 Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm a small letters guy. Plus I'm a New Orleans guy. My pick is any variety of the 1840-O New Orleans Half. James

  • seatedlib3991seatedlib3991 Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Leeroybrown . Your question does not mention grade but amend my pick with this condition. The true beauty of the Sully inspired design details shine best if the coin is at least an XF-45. I only collect circulated coins but my one and only would be an AU-50 or so. James

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 10,387 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1840(o) large eagle

  • semikeycollectorsemikeycollector Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cheating answer-The 1866 No-Motto Philadelphia piece is believed to be unique (as is its companion quarter).
    1855-S or 1871-CC in BU with PCGS pop of only 3.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "Seated Liberty Half Dollars - which date is the best to own?"

    The one that (for whatecer reason) I covet the most and can comfortably afford.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,424 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m biased towards anything Carson City so for me it would be an 1870-CC.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 10,387 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @skier07 said:
    I’m biased towards anything Carson City so for me it would be an 1870-CC.

    +1, I almost picked that one. Not sure why I was limiting myself to one choice anyway.

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,652 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting question... and equally interesting responses!

    I'd have initially deferred to the one-year type piece... 1853 A&R. It's a beautiful coin, especially when toned and in higher grade.

    The "higher grade " comments got me to thinking that if I only could have one, I'd want the highest grade possible regardless of date. I'd pick a price point you're comfortable with and find the best already certified coin I could find.

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Eldorado9Eldorado9 Posts: 2,576 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These are a couple good one's:


  • LeeroybrownLeeroybrown Posts: 499 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Beauty Catbert !!

    Here is mine of the same date:


  • MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,373 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with the 1853 A&R, but another one to consider is the 1861-O CSA Obverse.

  • goldengolden Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the 1839 No Drapery Half Dollar.

  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My solitary Seated half is an attractive VF 1853 A&R, holed, that resides on my key chain.

    If I were to collect the series, the first coins on my wish list would be the high-survival but low-mintage 1879-1890 subset.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,727 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LJenkins11 said:

    Key to each branch mint?
    52-O, 70-CC, 78-S

    The condition of this piece is outside of your target range. Therefore you ought to sell it to me please. 😘

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,571 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good question and I don't think I can limit my choices to one coin. I've always liked the 1847/46 (early die state only), the 1851, 1852, 1855-S, and 1887. All of these coins in any grade are desirable, at least to me.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • CoinbertCoinbert Posts: 624 ✭✭✭✭✭


    My favorite seated look. Ditto Catbert and Ljnkins11.

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,727 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gorgeous @Coinbert !

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 4,173 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RichieURich said:
    Good question and I don't think I can limit my choices to one coin. I've always liked the 1847/46 (early die state only), the 1851, 1852, 1855-S, and 1887. All of these coins in any grade are desirable, at least to me.

    Yet the 1851, 1852, and 1855-S haven't increased in value much over the last 18 years from what I see. The 1887 appears to be going through a surge at the moment, with XF and AU CAC coins going for $2000-$2500 now. They always seem to be hot coins to buy, particularly CAC stickered examples.

    I have ignored most of the rare varieties. The standard set is difficult enough. I may go after them later.

    The 1839 No Drapery, 1876-CC, 1864, and 1865 - all they do is go up in price, year after year.

    I used to think the 1857-S was the hottest SLH on the planet. A coin I purchased and returned for $500 (for reverse graffiti), appeared on your site a few months later for $900 and sold in two weeks. Prices were soaring; I couldn't win an auction no matter what I bid. I remain the underbidder record holder for XF40. Yet 1857-Ss haven't shown any price growth in the last 6 years. I suspect hoarding explains the weird price fluctuations.

    3 rim nicks away from Good

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file