Home World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

PCGS Ancients starting

This is great to see! The more interesting thing here is the 10 point grading scale… I personally am all for it…
The downside, it seems to only be for Chinese cash coins to date.

To quote
“PCGS is thrilled to announce our expansion into grading ancient coins. Starting today, we are authenticating and encapsulating select Chinese cash coins from the Qing Dynasty era,
available exclusively at our Shanghai office. We are also offering something no other
third-party grading service has done: A comprehensive guarantee on ancient coins,
covering both the grade and authenticity.
With the addition of this service line, we are also introducing a new 10-point grading scale for
ancient cash coinage. Explore qualifying coins, the PCGS Ancients Guarantee, and this new grading scale.“

Comments

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,187 ✭✭✭✭✭

    10 point grading scale ... why?

    Authenticity guarantee ... I hope the "experts" really are experts.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    WCCWCC Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    10 point grading scale ... why?

    Authenticity guarantee ... I hope the "experts" really are experts.

    I haven't read the announcement, but hopefully not the same 10-point scale as cards and comics. That's not actually a 10-point scale.

    Why? Probably to use one different from NGC.

  • Options
    John ConduittJohn Conduitt Posts: 462 ✭✭✭✭

    As usual with ancients and hammered coins in general, grading is irrelevant. 5, 10, 100 points, it isn't useful. Guaranteeing authenticity, on the other hand, is useful. If only the coins were actually ancient and not modern, as these Chinese coins are.

  • Options
    ExbritExbrit Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭✭

    The ten point system sank like a rock at NGC. Authenticity is useful, if they have the ability experts to authenticate them.

  • Options
    AbueloAbuelo Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Qing dynasty is XVII century, is not? Not sure these are ancients.

  • Options
    jt88jt88 Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Abuelo said:
    Qing dynasty is XVII century, is not? Not sure these are ancients.

    Qing dynasty is 1644–1912

  • Options
    AbueloAbuelo Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jt88 said:

    @Abuelo said:
    Qing dynasty is XVII century, is not? Not sure these are ancients.

    Qing dynasty is 1644–1912

    My point exactly, these are not ancient coins.

  • Options
    SapyxSapyx Posts: 2,557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PCGS posted in their official thread on the subject that they are effectively re-defining the word "ancients" so as to include Chinese cash coins.

    Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one.
    Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"

    Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice. B)
  • Options
    AbueloAbuelo Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Sapyx said:
    PCGS posted in their official thread on the subject that they are effectively re-defining the word "ancients" so as to include Chinese cash coins.

    I saw that. Yet I have Mexican coins that are a century older and nobody would think they are "ancient".

  • Options
    MrMonkeySwag96MrMonkeySwag96 Posts: 143 ✭✭✭

    NGC doesn't guarantee the authenticity of ancient coins, they only holder coins they think are "authentic" in their opinion. NGC isn't liable if they slab a fake ancient coin. I wonder if PCGS would offer a true guarantee of authenticity for ancients.

Sign In or Register to comment.