Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

FS Error wheat penny?

chrisgrchrisgr Posts: 4 ✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch- official rejection or home workshop? Education needed and greatly appreciated.

Tagged:

Comments

  • Options
    CregCreg Posts: 1,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Welcome, I hope that members can provide the answers, but I’m gonna guess no, and home workshop.

  • Options
    jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 4,055 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @chrisgr You're going to be disappointed in the responses you get without posting pictures

  • Options
    chrisgrchrisgr Posts: 4 ✭


  • Options
    chrisgrchrisgr Posts: 4 ✭

    Thanks! Now where’s the info, o expert ones?

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,627 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Welcome to the forum.
    The coin suffered damage after it was minted.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    CregCreg Posts: 1,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I must be psychic.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @chrisgr said:
    Thanks! Now where’s the info, o expert ones?

    Coin was hit with a punch of some kind which created a depression on the obverse and a corresponding protrusion on the reverse.

    You're welcome,
    Damage Expert

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 17,444 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 27, 2025 1:40PM

    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

  • Options
    World67World67 Posts: 13,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • Options
    jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 4,055 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @chrisgr said:
    Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch- official rejection or home workshop? Education needed and greatly appreciated.

    @chrisgr could you describe what the terms "FS Error" and "mint laminating error" mean to you? There is nothing in your pictures that suggests anything other than damage (and a lot of it). You must be using those terms to mean something other than the way that everyone else uses them?

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,230 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 27, 2025 4:02PM

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer. If you'd like to write a 5000 word essay on all the different damage in that coin, go ahead.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    I get it. You don't like me. That's fine. But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    Hey @IkesT , JBK just found his first protégé. Let's all congratulate him.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,450 ✭✭✭✭✭

    the parallel scratches are from abrasions of some sort

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 17,444 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

  • Options
    gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,901 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cant we all just get along?

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • Options
    coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,453 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @gumby1234 said:
    Cant we all just get along?

    A simple concept that can be challenging to execute.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,230 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 27, 2025 6:44PM

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    World67World67 Posts: 13,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    No it's not.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    No it's not.

    Lol. Then perhaps it just goes UNNOTICED.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    World67World67 Posts: 13,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    No it's not.

    Lol. Then perhaps it just goes UNNOTICED.

    No it doesn't.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    No it's not.

    Lol. Then perhaps it just goes UNNOTICED.

    No it doesn't.

    NOTED.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    No it's not.

    Lol. Then perhaps it just goes UNNOTICED.

    No it doesn't.

    What's with the words? Not a single meme?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,627 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 27, 2025 7:12PM

    @gumby1234 said:
    Cant we all just get along?

    It’s a shame that from time to time, long-standing members > @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    No it's not.

    Lol. Then perhaps it just goes UNNOTICED.

    No it doesn't.

    NOTED.

    Did you mean “NOTICED”? 😀

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,230 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 27, 2025 7:14PM

    @MFeld said:

    @gumby1234 said:
    Cant we all just get along?

    It’s a shame that from time to time, long-standing members > @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:
    The Damage Expert forgot to notice that the coin was flattened prior to being struck with said punch. ;)

    I think you mean forgot to "note", not "notice". In fact, I did neither. He asked about the "date punch". I gave a succinct answer.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. But thanks anyway for trying to tell me what I meant.

    And you are incorrect about what the OP asked about.

    He asked "Might this be a mint laminating error? and why the date punch".

    Note the "and". There were multiple issues he was asking about.

    Further "damage expert" was a poke at the OP (see their prior post), nothing more.

    Yes, I understood that. That's why I capitalized it exactly as you did. It was a poke at your poke at the OP, "nothing more".

    But next time you want to call me a nit picker (or @MFeld ), you might just look in the mirror. And the next time you want to accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, you might just look in the mirror.

    There is no reason for me to look in my mirror to find the nitpickiest person on the forum, or the most argumentative person, or the person most determined to have the last word. ;)

    BTW, I don't recall accusing you of "arguing for the sake of arguing", at least not in a long time, so you are probably confusing me with someone else (or multiple people?).

    That's probably true. I'm sure you recognize yourself without the mirror.

    If you meant nothing by "Coin Expert", then I apologize for that. But given our history, you can understand why I may have jumped to the wrong conclusion.

    Yes, numerous people have chosen arguments with me to convince me that I just like to argue. Irony is, apparently, dead.

    I NOTICED the question about the lamination. However, it is unclear what he meant by that so I chose not to NOTE anything about it. You know how i like to be succinct in all my responses. 😄

    No it's not.

    Lol. Then perhaps it just goes UNNOTICED.

    No it doesn't.

    NOTED.

    Did you mean “NOTICED”? 😀

    I "dis" not. 😉

    Oh, you were too fast for me with the edit. Lol

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,615 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All posts have been duly noted.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...