Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

A Repeating 3-Day GTG Experiment - 1st Coin Completes 7-21

FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 18, 2025 7:28PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I thought it would be interesting to run a sort of experiment here with GTGs. Oftentimes posters will use GTGs to get an idea of if to resubmit a coin, or not to.

Here's my question - how accurate is the forum, grading from images alone? Over the years, I've built up a good chunk of coins with my own images that we can use for this purpose, given the consistent images and vast array of grades/services.

Here's how I plan to do it - one coin a week, after which the grades will be tallied and scored. Each correct answer will be 0 points, 1 point off is 1 point, 2 points off 2 points, etc. Missing designations counts as a point. Essentially, the fewer points at the end of the grade session the better. All coins for the moment will be CAC certified, so as to add another degree of accuracy in the actual grade. I will also choose coins I feel are properly graded.

I will upload the guesses into the below publicly accessible Google Sheet, so you all can view the data for yourselves.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UYJAbLnHMsDWuv72Rj7AjlTbFLkctDOiw7rHwDq45ZU/edit?gid=0#gid=0

I'll let each coin run for roughly three days.

We'll start simple - this 1881-S $1.

«1

Comments

  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 483 ✭✭✭✭

    MS66+

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 285 ✭✭✭✭

    MS 65

  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS67+

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 260 ✭✭✭

    MS66

  • U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,487 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS 67

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,758 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll guess MS67+ and if it weren't stickered by CAC I very well might have guessed MS68.
    Said another way, I'll be shocked it the coin grades less than 67.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 260 ✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    I'll guess MS67+ and if it weren't stickered by CAC I very well might have guessed MS68.
    Said another way, I'll be shocked it the coin grades less than 67.

    Like any GTG, I wonder how comments and grade guesses alike affect the downstream guesses. If you had posted your grade and comment 7/31 vs 7/18 would the average guess be different? Either way, I think it's a fun experiment and look forward to seeing the results.

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 9,044 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,758 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @MFeld said:
    I'll guess MS67+ and if it weren't stickered by CAC I very well might have guessed MS68.
    Said another way, I'll be shocked it the coin grades less than 67.

    Like any GTG, I wonder how comments and grade guesses alike affect the downstream guesses. If you had posted your grade and comment 7/31 vs 7/18 would the average guess be different? Either way, I think it's a fun experiment and look forward to seeing the results.

    I’ve also wondered if or how much some guesses affect others that follow. I can tell you that there have been plenty of occasions in which it seemed clear that some guesses clearly weren’t influenced by mine (or my comments).😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,895 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS67. Very clean cheek with only about 3 minor blemishes on primary focal points.

    God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,624 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66+

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • bigmountainlionbigmountainlion Posts: 257 ✭✭✭

    Since it’s from flyingAl. MS68. Otherwise MS 67

  • KliaoKliao Posts: 5,670 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS-67

    Collector
    91 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 56 members and counting!
    instagram.com/klnumismatics

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A great start to this experiment!

    So far I'm calculating the average, standard deviation of the guesses, and the how far off the average guess is from the actual grade. If anyone else would like to see some other calculations, please let me know!

    Additionally, is a week just right, not long enough, or too long?

  • WinLoseWinWinLoseWin Posts: 1,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

    "To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl said:
    A great start to this experiment!

    So far I'm calculating the average, standard deviation of the guesses, and the how far off the average guess is from the actual grade. If anyone else would like to see some other calculations, please let me know!

    Additionally, is a week just right, not long enough, or too long?

    I would prefer 3 days but others might differ. Thanks for the thread!

    God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pcgsregistrycollector said:

    @FlyingAl said:
    A great start to this experiment!

    So far I'm calculating the average, standard deviation of the guesses, and the how far off the average guess is from the actual grade. If anyone else would like to see some other calculations, please let me know!

    Additionally, is a week just right, not long enough, or too long?

    I would prefer 3 days but others might differ. Thanks for the thread!

    I think this may be preferable. I'll switch to that.

  • Davidk7Davidk7 Posts: 523 ✭✭✭✭

    67

    Collector of Capped Bust Halves, SLQ's, Commems, and random cool stuff! @davidv_numismatics on Instagram

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • OnBendedKneeOnBendedKnee Posts: 309 ✭✭✭

    Would it be against your rules if I waited for Cougar to proper his guess and then (add a point or two) offer then mine?

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,541 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67+ very nice
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • winestevenwinesteven Posts: 4,866 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Throwing a dart, I’ll say 67+.

    Steve

    A day without fine wine and working on your coin collection is like a day without sunshine!!!

    My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
  • CoinbertCoinbert Posts: 494 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS 67

  • shishshish Posts: 1,176 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS-67

    Liberty Seated and Trade Dollar Specialist
  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66+

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7

  • JBNJBN Posts: 1,898 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

  • seatedlib3991seatedlib3991 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I started out at 67 because of how clean the coin is both fields and cheek. Then I remembered the person posting this is suppose to be a photo guru. To me the 1881-S is a coin that must have knock you off your chair luster to get high grades. this coin does not appear that way to me so I will guess 66. James

  • 66

  • jp84jp84 Posts: 222 ✭✭✭

    66

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll grade this a 67+.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Right now, we're sitting at an average of a 67 grade, plus or minus a half a point in deviation over 29 guesses. Very tight grading on this one!

  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ms-67

    Easton Collection
  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67 cac at least; a couple luster grazes etc.; not sure how many they'd permit for a 68.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @logger7 said:
    67 cac at least; a couple luster grazes etc.; not sure how many they'd permit for a 68.

    I'll count this as a 67+.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,758 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 19, 2025 7:43AM

    @FlyingAl said:

    @logger7 said:
    67 cac at least; a couple luster grazes etc.; not sure how many they'd permit for a 68.

    I'll count this as a 67+.

    Instead of doing that, why not ask him to specify his grade guess? A guess of “67 at least” is too vague, as it covers numerous grade possibilities.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @FlyingAl said:

    @logger7 said:
    67 cac at least; a couple luster grazes etc.; not sure how many they'd permit for a 68.

    I'll count this as a 67+.

    Instead of doing that, why not ask him to specify his grade guess? A guess of “67 at least” is too vague, as it covers numerous grade possibilities.

    This is a good idea, but there's also always a few guesses in a GTG where the poster has to interpret the grade somewhat. It may be good for the experiment's sake to keep that factor in the data. Just a thought.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,758 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 19, 2025 8:03AM

    @FlyingAl said:

    @MFeld said:

    @FlyingAl said:

    @logger7 said:
    67 cac at least; a couple luster grazes etc.; not sure how many they'd permit for a 68.

    I'll count this as a 67+.

    Instead of doing that, why not ask him to specify his grade guess? A guess of “67 at least” is too vague, as it covers numerous grade possibilities.

    This is a good idea, but there's also always a few guesses in a GTG where the poster has to interpret the grade somewhat. It may be good for the experiment's sake to keep that factor in the data. Just a thought.

    For purposes of this exercise, if the guessed grade isn’t specific/needs interpretation, it shouldn’t count. You can always give someone a chance to get off the fence and redo their guess so that it’s clear. I’ll butt out now, as it’s your thread, not mine.😬

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭✭✭

    For now, we'll keep it as is unless @logger7 wants to add extra clarification.

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,264 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl This looks like an interesting challenge indeed.

    I'm really torn on this one. I am waffling between two grades, but I am really leaning towards the upper one. Is it enough? Not really sure. Not my series and not my grade range, but it has to be close. But, probably like many here, I'll pick the plus grade for the in-between.

    Put me down for MS67+


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • mattnissmattniss Posts: 761 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Waffling back and forth whether or not it's a plus, but going to make it official and say this coin is an MS67+. I've seen 8's that had a mark or two more than this one, but the minor blemishes on the obverse hold it back from a full 8 IMO.

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rattler: 66
    Regular holder or raw: 67

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,758 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnny010 said:
    Rattler: 66
    Regular holder or raw: 67

    The initial post indicated that the coin’s been stickered, so “raw” isn’t an option.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @johnny010 said:
    Rattler: 66
    Regular holder or raw: 67

    The initial post indicated that the coin’s been stickered, so “raw” isn’t an option.

    Correct but I guess I’m saying if this coin or any coin like this was raw, it would be a 67 and it lines up with today’s grading standard. 90% irrelevant I suppose.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,550 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am not dialed into Morgan dollars. An 1881 S is a common coin. I do not know how TPGs view the 1881 S Morgan for grading. The pictured coin does have some marks on the fields and devices on both sides. The appearance of the surface of the chin, jaw, cheek, mouth and neck of Ms. Liberty looks off to me.

    I looked at Coin Facts photos of MS 1881 S Morgans and note that in coins graded 67 and above bust of Ms. Liberty is mostly uniform and smooth in appearance (thus different than the appearance of chin, jaw, cheek, mouth and neck of Ms. Liberty in the pictured coin). For coins graded less than MS67, some of them show Ms. Liberty with various flaws.

    My guess as to the grade of the pictured coin is MS66 at best.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,758 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    I am not dialed into Morgan dollars. An 1881 S is a common coin. I do not know how TPGs view the 1881 S Morgan for grading. The pictured coin does have some marks on the fields and devices on both sides. The appearance of the surface of the chin, jaw, cheek, mouth and neck of Ms. Liberty looks off to me.

    I looked at Coin Facts photos of MS 1881 S Morgans and note that in coins graded 67 and above bust of Ms. Liberty is mostly uniform and smooth in appearance (thus different than the appearance of chin, jaw, cheek, mouth and neck of Ms. Liberty in the pictured coin). For coins graded less than MS67, some of them show Ms. Liberty with various flaws.

    My guess as to the grade of the pictured coin is MS66 at best.

    Having viewed an extremely large quantity of images of MS67-68 Morgan dollars and more than my fair share in hand, I can’t even fathom the subject coin grading as low as MS66, much less, MS66 at best. I’d love to see pictures of a couple examples of that grade that you saw and thought looked superior to the one being assessed here.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,581 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file