Interestingly, the Superman coin is coming in at $2670 at $3300 gold. If true, that should certainly stifle demand.
It does, however, seem out of line with everything else in the grid. Because everything else starts at a base, and then increases proportionally with the price of gold. Dollar for dollar.
Superman starts out lower, but then increases $80 for every $50 increase in gold. By the time you get to $3300, starting from $500, it's insane. Maybe it's a mistake. Maybe it's the licensing agreement.
If it is not a mistake, selling gold at $5340 per ounce when the mintage is 10K is outrageous. I wanted that coin, but don't see how I can possibly justify that price.
@MsMorrisine said:
that's a killer licensing fee on those comic arts ones
Yup. I'm still hoping it's a mistake. Because, if not, "regular" Mint products have an insane base premium to spot that does not vary based on spot, while DC is getting a fee based on a $360 premium to $500 spot, PLUS a $30 premium to every $50 increase in spot above $500.
The reason the Mint has a hard time selling regular issues like proof and burnished buffaloes and AGEs is that the market actually requires a reduced premium to spot as spot increases, while the Mint's premium is static. With the comic coins, they are actually INCREASING it, which is insane.
A $360 premium to $500 spot, $1260 premium to $2000 spot, and $2160 premium to $3500 spot. Literally defying the laws of economics by charging a higher premium on top of a higher base. I'm not sure what market would actually support such a pricing scheme, but modern NCLT precious metal coins is not among them.
It's a beautiful coin with a popular pop culture subject and an attractive mintage. But asking $500 more than what I would have thought would be an already elevated $2K for it should serve to suck all the juice out of it.
I'll be surprised if it sells out at that price. Whether or not it does, it's almost certain buyers will be buried in it until gold approaches $5K per ounce.
@HalfDime said:
The mint has nine comic gold coins to sell. Like I said earlier, the sales will crash by the time they get to the ninth coin of less popular figures.
PS If they do a HHL of 1 on these, they are crazy.
Honestly, at $2670 for a half ounce of gold, sales might crash right out of the gate. TBD, but it's hard to see an upside at that price.
And, without an upside, it's not going to be easy to get people excited. Particularly when there are two far lower cost options if people just want to get in on the action.
If I'm right, the HHL is going to be irrelevant, because people will be able to get whatever they want. And they won't want any.
@Weather11am said:
Unpopular opinion, but I think this is pretty cool
I agree. So many non collectors wondered if these were gold when they were release, now we will have one that is!
Great! Now that they are here, let's see how many people are interested in putting their money where their curiosity was.
I happen to agree with @fathom 1,000,000% on this, and am puzzled as to why a 25 year old coin that never gained any traction with the public in the first place needs a gold tribute coin. I doubt there would be widespread interest in it as bullion, and really doubt there will be interest at the premium they will be seeking as a proof numismatic item.
At likely a very similar price and mintage, one week apart, between this and the Superman coin, which one do you think is going to sell and which is going to sit, assuming the market isn't deep enough to absorb both of them? Especially with the bi-annual High Relief Liberty coin a few weeks behind.
I'm sure you will post about 450 times between now and then to let us know
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
@Weather11am said:
Unpopular opinion, but I think this is pretty cool
I agree. So many non collectors wondered if these were gold when they were release, now we will have one that is!
Great! Now that they are here, let's see how many people are interested in putting their money where their curiosity was.
I happen to agree with @fathom 1,000,000% on this, and am puzzled as to why a 25 year old coin that never gained any traction with the public in the first place needs a gold tribute coin. I doubt there would be widespread interest in it as bullion, and really doubt there will be interest at the premium they will be seeking as a proof numismatic item.
At likely a very similar price and mintage, one week apart, between this and the Superman coin, which one do you think is going to sell and which is going to sit, assuming the market isn't deep enough to absorb both of them? Especially with the bi-annual High Relief Liberty coin a few weeks behind.
I'm sure you will post about 450 times between now and then to let us know
Probably. But, now that I have seen the very extremely extraordinarily obnoxious pricing for the Comic Arts gold coins, I am backing off of my prediction of them being a slam dunk winner.
@NJCoin
"The reason the Mint has a hard time selling regular issues like proof and burnished buffaloes and AGEs is that the market actually requires a reduced premium to spot as spot increases, while the Mint's premium is static. With the comic coins, they are actually INCREASING it, which is insane."
It is rumored that the Mint's premium isn't so 'static' when it comes to pricing on the Comic coins...
"The United States Mint has always used static grid pricing vs. dynamic grid pricing for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
Static grid pricing in the past. Always for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
The Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold will be the first time the Mint has used dynamic grid pricing.
Dynamic grid pricing. First time.
The dynamic grid pricing for the Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold changes pricing by $40.00 per $50.00 increment.
The old static grid pricing for ½ oz. would be $25.00 per $50.00 increment.
The premium on $3250.00 is $1005.00
The premium on $3300.00 is $1020.00
The premium on $3350.00 is $1035.00
The premium on $3400.00 is $1050.00
The premium on $3450.00 is $1065.00
The premium on $3500.00 is $1080.00
The premium on $3550.00 is $1095.00
The premium on $3600.00 is $1100.00"
@Rc5280 said: @NJCoin
"The reason the Mint has a hard time selling regular issues like proof and burnished buffaloes and AGEs is that the market actually requires a reduced premium to spot as spot increases, while the Mint's premium is static. With the comic coins, they are actually INCREASING it, which is insane."
It is rumored that the Mint's premium isn't so 'static' when it comes to pricing on the Comic coins...
"The United States Mint has always used static grid pricing vs. dynamic grid pricing for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
Static grid pricing in the past. Always for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
The Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold will be the first time the Mint has used dynamic grid pricing.
Dynamic grid pricing. First time.
The dynamic grid pricing for the Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold changes pricing by $40.00 per $50.00 increment.
The old static grid pricing for ½ oz. would be $25.00 per $50.00 increment.
The premium on $3250.00 is $1005.00
The premium on $3300.00 is $1020.00
The premium on $3350.00 is $1035.00
The premium on $3400.00 is $1050.00
The premium on $3450.00 is $1065.00
The premium on $3500.00 is $1080.00
The premium on $3550.00 is $1095.00
The premium on $3600.00 is $1100.00"
Um, in your example pricing, is it supposed to go up $25 per increment or just $15 but only $5 from $3550 to $3600?
@Rc5280 said: @NJCoin
"The reason the Mint has a hard time selling regular issues like proof and burnished buffaloes and AGEs is that the market actually requires a reduced premium to spot as spot increases, while the Mint's premium is static. With the comic coins, they are actually INCREASING it, which is insane."
It is rumored that the Mint's premium isn't so 'static' when it comes to pricing on the Comic coins...
"The United States Mint has always used static grid pricing vs. dynamic grid pricing for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
Static grid pricing in the past. Always for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
The Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold will be the first time the Mint has used dynamic grid pricing.
Dynamic grid pricing. First time.
The dynamic grid pricing for the Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold changes pricing by $40.00 per $50.00 increment.
The old static grid pricing for ½ oz. would be $25.00 per $50.00 increment.
The premium on $3250.00 is $1005.00
The premium on $3300.00 is $1020.00
The premium on $3350.00 is $1035.00
The premium on $3400.00 is $1050.00
The premium on $3450.00 is $1065.00
The premium on $3500.00 is $1080.00
The premium on $3550.00 is $1095.00
The premium on $3600.00 is $1100.00"
Yup. Dynamic. Not static.
But they are misreading the market for these things. The premium should go down, not up, as the value of the precious metal content increases. I believe they will see this on July 24th, when the market rejects a $2040 premium to $3300 gold on an issue with a mintage of 10K.
A Golden Legacy: Celebrating 25 Years of the Sacagawea Dollar
Honoring a Numismatic Icon
In 2025, the United States Mint commemorates the 25th anniversary of the Sacagawea Dollar with a groundbreaking release: the first-ever 24-karat gold version of this iconic coin. This milestone not only celebrates a quarter-century of the coin's history but also pays tribute to the rich cultural heritage it represents. Collectors and investors alike are eagerly anticipating this limited-edition release, which promises to be a highlight in modern numismatics.
The Origins of the Sacagawea Dollar
Introduced in 2000, the Sacagawea Dollar was designed to replace the unpopular Susan B. Anthony dollar. The obverse features a portrait of Sacagawea, the Shoshone guide who played a crucial role in the Lewis and Clark Expedition, carrying her infant son, Jean Baptiste. This design, created by artist Glenna Goodacre, was selected for its cultural significance and artistic merit. The reverse, designed by Thomas D. Rogers, depicts a soaring eagle encircled by 17 stars, representing the states in the Union at the time of the expedition.
The Golden Appearance - Clearing Misconceptions
Despite its golden hue, the Sacagawea Dollar contains no actual gold. The coin's distinctive color comes from its composition: a core of pure copper clad by manganese brass, consisting of 77% copper, 12% zinc, 7% manganese, and 4% nickel. This alloy was chosen to give the coin a unique appearance and to ensure compatibility with vending machines. The golden color has led to the common misconception that the coin is made of gold, but it is, in fact, a base-metal coin.
The 1999 22K Gold Sacagawea Dollars - A Journey into Space
In June 1999, the U.S. Mint struck 39 experimental 22-karat gold Sacagawea Dollars, each bearing the date 2000 and a "W" mint mark, despite being produced at the Philadelphia Mint. These proof coins were struck on planchets typically used for half-ounce American Gold Eagles. Although there were early discussions about releasing them to the public, the plan was ultimately canceled. The Mint selected the 12 finest examples for preservation and melted the remaining 27.
To honor Colonel Eileen Collins - the first woman to command a U.S. spaceflight - these 12 selected coins were flown aboard Space Shuttle Columbia during mission STS-93 in July 1999. After logging more than 1.8 million miles in orbit, the coins were returned to Earth and placed in secure storage at the United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox, where they remain today. They were publicly exhibited for the first and only time in August 2007 at the American Numismatic Association World's Fair of Money in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Transition to the Native American Dollar Series
In 2009, the Sacagawea Dollar series transitioned to the Native American Dollar series, featuring annually changing reverse designs that honor the contributions of Native American individuals and tribes to the history and development of the United States. Despite these changes, the obverse has consistently retained Glenna Goodacre's portrait of Sacagawea and her son. This ongoing series serves as a tribute to the rich and diverse heritage of Native American cultures.
The 2025-W 25th Anniversary Sacagawea Gold Coin
To commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Sacagawea Dollar, the U.S. Mint plans to release a special edition 24-karat gold proof coin in 2025. Struck at the West Point Mint, this half-ounce coin will feature the original 2000 design. As of now, no additional inscriptions denoting weight or fineness are expected to appear on the coin. This release marks the first time the Sacagawea Dollar will be available in .9999 fine gold, making it a significant addition to any collection.
A Tribute to Legacy and Innovation
The Sacagawea Dollar has journeyed from its inception as a replacement for the Susan B. Anthony dollar to becoming a symbol of cultural recognition and innovation in U.S. coinage. The upcoming 25th-anniversary gold release encapsulates this legacy, offering collectors a unique opportunity to own a piece of history. This release not only honors the past but also sets a precedent for future numismatic endeavors.
As one of the nation’s leading precious metals retailers, Bullion Exchanges is closely monitoring the U.S. Mint’s announcements regarding the 25th Anniversary Sacagawea Gold Proof Coin. As soon as official details - including mintage limits, release date, and product specifications - are confirmed, we’ll post updates right here, so our customers can stay ahead of the market and secure this historic coin upon release. Stay tuned!
not really. printed materials are easier to forge than metal
imagine taking a credit suisse gold bar that has no metal content on it the removing it from the assay card. what do you have? gold? gold plate? sure, all of it can be counterfeited, but it is just harder for someone to accept if it doesn't try to say metal content
It's an interesting mintage, but, as with everything else from the Mint lately, it's going to be very expensive for what it is. I'm far more interested in homages to classic coins from 100-230 years ago than tributes to coins from 25 years ago that never actually caught on.
As a result, while 7500 might make these winners, I'll save my $2200 for something else.
@1madman said:
I like the fact the mint didn’t use .9999 or gold or 1/2 ounce, etc on the coin itself. Really beautiful coin with that elusive W mintmark.
I hate it. It's just going to reinforce the confusion that all NA $s are made of gold.
@Goldbully said:
Coin World article...................
During the tenure of former U.S. Mint Director Philip N. Diehl, in June 1999, 39 Proof 2000-W gold examples were struck at the West Point Mint, using the W Mint mark, but in the same 22-karat, .9167 fine gold composition as the American Eagle half-ounce gold $25 coins.
>
The 2000-W gold Sacagaweas were actually struck at the Philadelphia Mint.
I'd like one of these. I don't know if I can afford to throw down that much money with gold so elevated right now, but I think they're cool. It's a great design, and although unmarked, gold should be very obvious to differentiate from "golden dollars." Especially with a W mark right under the date
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
@DCW said:
I'd like one of these. I don't know if I can afford to throw down that much money with gold so elevated right now, but I think they're cool. It's a great design, and although unmarked, gold should be very obvious to differentiate from "golden dollars." Especially with a W mark right under the date
It is also the only SACAGAWEA to have a date on the obverse in years.
@Goldbully said:
Coin World article...................
During the tenure of former U.S. Mint Director Philip N. Diehl, in June 1999, 39 Proof 2000-W gold examples were struck at the West Point Mint, using the W Mint mark, but in the same 22-karat, .9167 fine gold composition as the American Eagle half-ounce gold $25 coins.
>
The 2000-W gold Sacagaweas were actually struck at the Philadelphia Mint.
@DCW said:
I'd like one of these. I don't know if I can afford to throw down that much money with gold so elevated right now, but I think they're cool. It's a great design, and although unmarked, gold should be very obvious to differentiate from "golden dollars." Especially with a W mark right under the date
To us. To the non- collector, they are going to use a photo search, find the gold coin and think theirs is also gold.
Comments
I think you read it wrong. I'm reading $2175.
Interestingly, the Superman coin is coming in at $2670 at $3300 gold. If true, that should certainly stifle demand.
It does, however, seem out of line with everything else in the grid. Because everything else starts at a base, and then increases proportionally with the price of gold. Dollar for dollar.
Superman starts out lower, but then increases $80 for every $50 increase in gold. By the time you get to $3300, starting from $500, it's insane. Maybe it's a mistake. Maybe it's the licensing agreement.
If it is not a mistake, selling gold at $5340 per ounce when the mintage is 10K is outrageous. I wanted that coin, but don't see how I can possibly justify that price.
let me correct both numbers
that's a killer licensing fee on those comic arts ones
Yup. I'm still hoping it's a mistake. Because, if not, "regular" Mint products have an insane base premium to spot that does not vary based on spot, while DC is getting a fee based on a $360 premium to $500 spot, PLUS a $30 premium to every $50 increase in spot above $500.
The reason the Mint has a hard time selling regular issues like proof and burnished buffaloes and AGEs is that the market actually requires a reduced premium to spot as spot increases, while the Mint's premium is static. With the comic coins, they are actually INCREASING it, which is insane.
A $360 premium to $500 spot, $1260 premium to $2000 spot, and $2160 premium to $3500 spot. Literally defying the laws of economics by charging a higher premium on top of a higher base. I'm not sure what market would actually support such a pricing scheme, but modern NCLT precious metal coins is not among them.
It's a beautiful coin with a popular pop culture subject and an attractive mintage. But asking $500 more than what I would have thought would be an already elevated $2K for it should serve to suck all the juice out of it.
I'll be surprised if it sells out at that price. Whether or not it does, it's almost certain buyers will be buried in it until gold approaches $5K per ounce.
The mint has nine comic gold coins to sell. Like I said earlier, the sales will crash by the time they get to the ninth coin of less popular figures.
PS If they do a HHL of 1 on these, they are crazy.
what should the hhl be
Honestly, at $2670 for a half ounce of gold, sales might crash right out of the gate. TBD, but it's hard to see an upside at that price.
And, without an upside, it's not going to be easy to get people excited. Particularly when there are two far lower cost options if people just want to get in on the action.
If I'm right, the HHL is going to be irrelevant, because people will be able to get whatever they want. And they won't want any.
but the superman has an S privy
I'm sure you will post about 450 times between now and then to let us know
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Probably. But, now that I have seen the very extremely extraordinarily obnoxious pricing for the Comic Arts gold coins, I am backing off of my prediction of them being a slam dunk winner.
@NJCoin
"The reason the Mint has a hard time selling regular issues like proof and burnished buffaloes and AGEs is that the market actually requires a reduced premium to spot as spot increases, while the Mint's premium is static. With the comic coins, they are actually INCREASING it, which is insane."
It is rumored that the Mint's premium isn't so 'static' when it comes to pricing on the Comic coins...
"The United States Mint has always used static grid pricing vs. dynamic grid pricing for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
Static grid pricing in the past. Always for Gold, Platinum and Palladium.
The Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold will be the first time the Mint has used dynamic grid pricing.
Dynamic grid pricing. First time.
The dynamic grid pricing for the Comic Art ½ oz. 24k Gold changes pricing by $40.00 per $50.00 increment.
The old static grid pricing for ½ oz. would be $25.00 per $50.00 increment.
The premium on $3250.00 is $1005.00
The premium on $3300.00 is $1020.00
The premium on $3350.00 is $1035.00
The premium on $3400.00 is $1050.00
The premium on $3450.00 is $1065.00
The premium on $3500.00 is $1080.00
The premium on $3550.00 is $1095.00
The premium on $3600.00 is $1100.00"
Where's the Justice League when you need them?
Um, in your example pricing, is it supposed to go up $25 per increment or just $15 but only $5 from $3550 to $3600?
http://ProofCollection.Net
Yup. Dynamic. Not static.
But they are misreading the market for these things. The premium should go down, not up, as the value of the precious metal content increases. I believe they will see this on July 24th, when the market rejects a $2040 premium to $3300 gold on an issue with a mintage of 10K.
Only superman can afford to collect them.
Googled & found this:
A Golden Legacy: Celebrating 25 Years of the Sacagawea Dollar
Honoring a Numismatic Icon
In 2025, the United States Mint commemorates the 25th anniversary of the Sacagawea Dollar with a groundbreaking release: the first-ever 24-karat gold version of this iconic coin. This milestone not only celebrates a quarter-century of the coin's history but also pays tribute to the rich cultural heritage it represents. Collectors and investors alike are eagerly anticipating this limited-edition release, which promises to be a highlight in modern numismatics.
The Origins of the Sacagawea Dollar
Introduced in 2000, the Sacagawea Dollar was designed to replace the unpopular Susan B. Anthony dollar. The obverse features a portrait of Sacagawea, the Shoshone guide who played a crucial role in the Lewis and Clark Expedition, carrying her infant son, Jean Baptiste. This design, created by artist Glenna Goodacre, was selected for its cultural significance and artistic merit. The reverse, designed by Thomas D. Rogers, depicts a soaring eagle encircled by 17 stars, representing the states in the Union at the time of the expedition.
The Golden Appearance - Clearing Misconceptions
Despite its golden hue, the Sacagawea Dollar contains no actual gold. The coin's distinctive color comes from its composition: a core of pure copper clad by manganese brass, consisting of 77% copper, 12% zinc, 7% manganese, and 4% nickel. This alloy was chosen to give the coin a unique appearance and to ensure compatibility with vending machines. The golden color has led to the common misconception that the coin is made of gold, but it is, in fact, a base-metal coin.
The 1999 22K Gold Sacagawea Dollars - A Journey into Space
In June 1999, the U.S. Mint struck 39 experimental 22-karat gold Sacagawea Dollars, each bearing the date 2000 and a "W" mint mark, despite being produced at the Philadelphia Mint. These proof coins were struck on planchets typically used for half-ounce American Gold Eagles. Although there were early discussions about releasing them to the public, the plan was ultimately canceled. The Mint selected the 12 finest examples for preservation and melted the remaining 27.
To honor Colonel Eileen Collins - the first woman to command a U.S. spaceflight - these 12 selected coins were flown aboard Space Shuttle Columbia during mission STS-93 in July 1999. After logging more than 1.8 million miles in orbit, the coins were returned to Earth and placed in secure storage at the United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox, where they remain today. They were publicly exhibited for the first and only time in August 2007 at the American Numismatic Association World's Fair of Money in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Transition to the Native American Dollar Series
In 2009, the Sacagawea Dollar series transitioned to the Native American Dollar series, featuring annually changing reverse designs that honor the contributions of Native American individuals and tribes to the history and development of the United States. Despite these changes, the obverse has consistently retained Glenna Goodacre's portrait of Sacagawea and her son. This ongoing series serves as a tribute to the rich and diverse heritage of Native American cultures.
The 2025-W 25th Anniversary Sacagawea Gold Coin
To commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Sacagawea Dollar, the U.S. Mint plans to release a special edition 24-karat gold proof coin in 2025. Struck at the West Point Mint, this half-ounce coin will feature the original 2000 design. As of now, no additional inscriptions denoting weight or fineness are expected to appear on the coin. This release marks the first time the Sacagawea Dollar will be available in .9999 fine gold, making it a significant addition to any collection.
A Tribute to Legacy and Innovation
The Sacagawea Dollar has journeyed from its inception as a replacement for the Susan B. Anthony dollar to becoming a symbol of cultural recognition and innovation in U.S. coinage. The upcoming 25th-anniversary gold release encapsulates this legacy, offering collectors a unique opportunity to own a piece of history. This release not only honors the past but also sets a precedent for future numismatic endeavors.
As one of the nation’s leading precious metals retailers, Bullion Exchanges is closely monitoring the U.S. Mint’s announcements regarding the 25th Anniversary Sacagawea Gold Proof Coin. As soon as official details - including mintage limits, release date, and product specifications - are confirmed, we’ll post updates right here, so our customers can stay ahead of the market and secure this historic coin upon release. Stay tuned!
The above from https://bullionexchanges.com/blog/a-golden-legacy-celebrating-25-years-of-the-sacagawea-dollar
Mint images just went live
I was hoping to see Cheerios Enhanced Tail Feathers too
https://www.usmint.gov/25th-anniversary-sacagawea-2025-golden-dollar-24k-one-half-ounce-gold-proof-coin-25SG1.html?srsltid=AfmBOooWFaq65g-ynRJmiBJaMA49yRGoTFfALM4UtlgrbDtlQZQR07Wu
I like the fact the mint didn’t use .9999 or gold or 1/2 ounce, etc on the coin itself. Really beautiful coin with that elusive W mintmark.
no info on metal content = low to no premium in a few years
I really do like this design...
if the tpg label has the metal content on it, buy a graded one, even if it's a 69
Putting it on the box isn't good enough?
http://ProofCollection.Net
not really. printed materials are easier to forge than metal
imagine taking a credit suisse gold bar that has no metal content on it the removing it from the assay card. what do you have? gold? gold plate? sure, all of it can be counterfeited, but it is just harder for someone to accept if it doesn't try to say metal content
It does look beautiful w o the metal content, but it makes it a tough sell as MsM notes.
I feel for the dealers having to explain to walk-in non collectors that the coins they brought in are worth a dollar each!
I guarantee you everybody is going to think theirs is the gold version, and that will lead to a lot of angry customers.
I can see it now! Facebook posts asking if the 2025 Sac they found in change is the real gold one!
Well, at least they put the date on the obverse where it belongs and not on the edge.
7,500.....
It's an interesting mintage, but, as with everything else from the Mint lately, it's going to be very expensive for what it is. I'm far more interested in homages to classic coins from 100-230 years ago than tributes to coins from 25 years ago that never actually caught on.
As a result, while 7500 might make these winners, I'll save my $2200 for something else.
somewhat hot
I hate it. It's just going to reinforce the confusion that all NA $s are made of gold.
>
The 2000-W gold Sacagaweas were actually struck at the Philadelphia Mint.
Link
My Adolph A. Weinman signature
I'd like one of these. I don't know if I can afford to throw down that much money with gold so elevated right now, but I think they're cool. It's a great design, and although unmarked, gold should be very obvious to differentiate from "golden dollars." Especially with a W mark right under the date
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
It is also the only SACAGAWEA to have a date on the obverse in years.
So the W is basically a privy mark not a mint mark
To us. To the non- collector, they are going to use a photo search, find the gold coin and think theirs is also gold.