Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Can someone please identify this?

Hello, I just acquired some coins. About 40 Kennedy half dollars, a can of 1976-77 pennies, a few other coins, but one is so worn I can't see a year or anything that identifies it, I'll try to load a couple of pics. Anyone know what it is, year, and possible guestimation of value? Thanks.

Comments

  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Howdy and welcome.

    If it's a genuine US Mint product it is a Morgan dollar and appears to have the date 1881. It has also been heavily polished and/or cleaned and might have been in jewelry or a belt buckle at some point. It currently has about $28 in silver value.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Toadman455Toadman455 Posts: 26
    edited June 25, 2025 10:54AM

    Wow, thanks for the fast reply and the cool info. These were my Grandfathers and my Dad had them in a box since 1978 so no telling what happened to it before.

  • dipset512dipset512 Posts: 22 ✭✭
    edited June 25, 2025 11:12AM

    I could be wrong, but that looks like a 9 instead of an 8.

  • It does. My Grandfather passed in 1978 and these coins have been in a box and unopened since. The newest coins in the box are 1977.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,739 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dipset512 said:
    I could be wrong, but that looks like a 9 instead of an 8.

    The last year of production for Morgan Dollars of that era was 1921. The second digit in the date is an 8, even if the heavy wear on the coin might lead you to speculate otherwise.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • OnBendedKneeOnBendedKnee Posts: 308 ✭✭✭

    Look at the rims. Definitely a 1921.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,739 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OnBendedKnee said:
    Look at the rims. Definitely a 1921.

    I sure don’t see the third digit of the date being a 2

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Any suggestions to what I can clean/wipe it with that may reveal more detail?

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    don't clean or wipe it. keep it as is

    trying to bring up the date will only make that area an ugly mess and damage it further

    what won't hurt to try, in this case, is a putting a sheet of paper over the area and use a angled pencil side to side over the date to see what that shows

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,731 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @OnBendedKnee said:
    Look at the rims. Definitely a 1921.

    I sure don’t see the third digit of the date being a 2

    My initial read on it was 1921. On that third digit, the curvature through the center coming from the upper right to lower left is wrong for an 8, and it does not look like the lower right curve comes all the way back to the center.

    For coins this worn, I actually find it helps to hold the coin further away, zooming in on the picture creates too much noise and prevents patterns in the image from being recognized.

    Sean Reynolds

    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The date is definitely 1921. The way they were made that year gave them a distinctly different wear pattern in low grades - as @OnBendedKnee mentions, much of the design mushes together while the rims can remain nearly full. It is a good lowball example, and if the mintmark, or lack of one, can be determined, it could be worth $35 to the right person.

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,660 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The Silver Dollar, regardless of date, has an odd wear pattern that suggests that the rims were somewhat protected while the devices were subject to very heavy wear. As TomB wrote, it was probably in some sort of item like a belt buckle. Some collectors like heavily worn coins like that but I don't know how they would view that particular coin. (I'm not one of those collectors. To me it is strictly a bullion item at this point.)

    All glory is fleeting.
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cleveland 117, San Antonio 109

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • jacrispiesjacrispies Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can make out the 1921 date fairly well.

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
    BHNC #AN-10
    JRCS #1606

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 8,395 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OnBendedKnee said:
    Look at the rims. Definitely a 1921.

    Agreed, it's a 1921.

  • @MsMorrisine said:
    don't clean or wipe it. keep it as is

    trying to bring up the date will only make that area an ugly mess and damage it further

    what won't hurt to try, in this case, is a putting a sheet of paper over the area and use a angled pencil side to side over the date to see what that shows

    I will try that, thank you.

  • @seanq said:

    @MFeld said:

    @OnBendedKnee said:
    Look at the rims. Definitely a 1921.

    I sure don’t see the third digit of the date being a 2

    My initial read on it was 1921. On that third digit, the curvature through the center coming from the upper right to lower left is wrong for an 8, and it does not look like the lower right curve comes all the way back to the center.

    For coins this worn, I actually find it helps to hold the coin further away, zooming in on the picture creates too much noise and prevents patterns in the image from being recognized.

    Sean Reynolds

    Thank you, I will try and create some better pics.

  • @Barberian said:
    Nice thread. Toadman is getting some top numismatic analysis on his low-grade Morgan dollar, and I learned something new as well.

    Yes, thank you all for all your help and info. I have to say this is my first coin experience and something tells me it won't be the last, ha.

  • GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭✭

    @Barberian said:
    Nice thread. Toadman is getting some top numismatic analysis on his low-grade Morgan dollar, and I learned something new as well.

    This is the stuff that makes these boards do great.

    imageimage

  • Well, glad I could help, ha. This is VERY interesting stuff...

  • I took two more pics using a lighted magnifier and it's clear you can see 1921. I just thought everyone may want to see what it actually turned out to be. Thanks again to all.

  • Here's the second, not sure why it didn't post along with the first one:

  • AngryTurtleAngryTurtle Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭

    Nice job on the pics! They are definitive.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    good job on the second set of pics

    1921 morgan dollars are wildly common to the point that dealers- looking at much better condition ones- will pay "less base value than other earlier dates

    yours is so bad off it won't have any premium over silver value (some better coins like morgan dollars have allure and bring a bit more than a bunch of worn 1964 quarters)

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26, 2025 6:44PM

    1921 melt value

    God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️

  • Thanks again everyone! It was an experience that I enjoyed. This may have got me started on something else to take up more of my time, lol. I got some magnifying glasses and one on a stand with a light ring around it yesterday.

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,624 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Toadman455 said:
    I took two more pics using a lighted magnifier and it's clear you can see 1921. I just thought everyone may want to see what it actually turned out to be. Thanks again to all.

    Good picture.

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file