Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Help date this badly corroded V nickel

erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,420 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 7, 2025 5:19AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I WANT to think it is an 1886, but I know that the chances of it are slim.


Comments

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,605 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1883

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    TypekatTypekat Posts: 668 ✭✭✭✭✭

    SWAG: 1888

    30+ years coin shop experience (ret.) Coins, bullion, currency, scrap & interesting folks. Loved every minute!

  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,091 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Typekat said:
    SWAG: 1888

    This, or 1898.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,922 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What does the other side look like? It might help to determine if 1883. I am leaning 1888.

  • Options
    lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 9,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ...my first thought was 1888... but pareidolia may be setting in!

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,420 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 7, 2025 9:34AM

    Decided to add some nic-a-date; pretty sure its 1896 now. Loops of the questionable number are different sizes, not the same as an 8 should be.

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,475 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Based on the partial shape of the last digit I think it is relatively safe to rule out a 1913.

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 32,270 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll go with an 86 as well

  • Options
    World67World67 Posts: 13,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m in at 1898

  • Options
    BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I vote 1888.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Options
    pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 2,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 8, 2025 1:06PM

    Definitely 1888. For the ppl saying 1886, the last serif doesn't shape like a 6.

    Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • Options
    mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 7,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not much to jump up and down about even if an '86.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file