Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Help date this badly corroded V nickel

erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 7, 2025 5:19AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I WANT to think it is an 1886, but I know that the chances of it are slim.


Comments

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,856 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1883

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • TypekatTypekat Posts: 534 ✭✭✭✭✭

    SWAG: 1888

    30+ years coin shop experience (ret.) Coins, bullion, currency, scrap & interesting folks. Loved every minute!

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,696 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Typekat said:
    SWAG: 1888

    This, or 1898.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,660 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What does the other side look like? It might help to determine if 1883. I am leaning 1888.

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,562 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ...my first thought was 1888... but pareidolia may be setting in!

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 7, 2025 9:34AM

    Decided to add some nic-a-date; pretty sure its 1896 now. Loops of the questionable number are different sizes, not the same as an 8 should be.

  • OnBendedKneeOnBendedKnee Posts: 332 ✭✭✭

    Based on the partial shape of the last digit I think it is relatively safe to rule out a 1913.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,212 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll go with an 86 as well

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 8,778 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m in at 1898

  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 10,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I vote 1888.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 1,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 8, 2025 1:06PM

    Definitely 1888. For the ppl saying 1886, the last serif doesn't shape like a 6.

    God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,411 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not much to jump up and down about even if an '86.

    Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file