Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
@Rc5280 said:
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
It is legal tender.
DPOTD-3 'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
@Rc5280 said:
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
@Rc5280 said:
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
All US coins are still legal tender.
They are now, but not aways. The Trade Dollar was demonetized in the 19th century. It became legal tender as part of Coinage Act of 1965. Cents have limited legal tender status up to 50 cents.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@Rc5280 said:
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
All US coins are still legal tender.
They are now, but not aways. The Trade Dollar was demonetized in the 19th century. It became legal tender as part of Coinage Act of 1965. Cents have legals tender status up to 50 cents.
I believe gold coins were also demonetized in 1933 when they were removed from circulation.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
@Rc5280 said:
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
All US coins are still legal tender.
They are now, but not aways. The Trade Dollar was demonetized in the 19th century. It became legal tender as part of Coinage Act of 1965. Cents have legals tender status up to 50 cents.
I believe gold coins were also demonetized in 1933 when they were removed from circulation.
As far as I know, the Trade Dollar was the only coin ever demonetized and then inadvertently remonetized in the 1965 coinage act as Bill mentions.
Gold coins were illegal to hold over a certain dollar amount though, like $30 I think.
@Rc5280 said:
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
All US coins are still legal tender.
They are now, but not aways. The Trade Dollar was demonetized in the 19th century. It became legal tender as part of Coinage Act of 1965. Cents have legals tender status up to 50 cents.
I believe gold coins were also demonetized in 1933 when they were removed from circulation.
As far as I know, the Trade Dollar was the only coin ever demonetized and then inadvertently remonetized in the 1965 coinage act as Bill mentions.
Gold coins were illegal to hold over a certain dollar amount though, like $30 I think.
You allowed to set aside $100 in gold, which many people did not realize they could do.
Gold coins were not demonized, but it was illegal to hold them beyond the $100, or if they were rare and collectible. That was slippery. It was clarified in 1954 when the government said any thing dated 1933 and before was “rare” and collectible. The 1933 $20 gold owners ran into trouble because the government said none were issued officially.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@Rc5280 said:
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
All US coins are still legal tender.
Thanks Manifest,
As I said , and especially those early 1900's commems, I've not educated myself enough on those. They are very nice though.
I have over the last 15+ years picked up a few from the Mint when they were 'reasonably' priced, and have since sent them in last year.
Here's a few favorites in sequential order, with no wear...
.
I carried this one around for years, still have it but it's no longer in my pocket on a daily basis.
Sean Reynolds
Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
@Higashiyama said:
Regarding large and worn commemoratives, you should take a look at the amazing Lafayette grading set assembled by @pocketpiececommems:
Funny how you remember coins.
I can't be sure that is the one but I remember bidding on a Missouri commem very similar.
I was outbid.
I like it.
I bought this VF30 with CAC off eBay from DLRC in October, 2012 for $208. At the same time, I recall there was another nice Missouri in a higher grade with nice rich toning, but it was raw. I decided on this coin but considered buying both.
The Iowa may turn out to be either AU58 or mint state. I've purchased 4-5 coins that I thought were AU+ that turned out to be MS63 and MS 64, teaching me a few tuition-free lessons on how to distinguish between AU+ and MS coins. When I botched the grading and purchased the wrong coin by mistake, I'd win! It's one of the peculiarities of being a circulated commemorative collector.
This was a $195 eBay grading "mistake." My best mistake in coin collecting.
PCGS MS63
Sorry for letting MS coins creep into this thread.
I really like how it brings out the relief in those art deco designs. I wonder if the sculptor had a vision for what they would look like circulated and made the design so it would be a plus to be worn and tarnished, it brings out the relief. Here
is a coin that someone painted, I think to get this effect, and it worked. Circ modern quarter but I had to keep it.
Comments
Without looking the coin up, and admittedly ignorant on the subject of Commems, the above doesn't appear to be Legal Tender, or is it?
Why so worn, and if intentionally worn down, why?
It is legal tender.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
Thanks
I agree. I always get a kick out of seeing a nicely worn commem when it crosses my desk. I have a nice California jubilee in my Dansco 7070.
Phil Arnold
Director of Photography, GreatCollections
greatcollections.com
All US coins are still legal tender.
They are now, but not aways. The Trade Dollar was demonetized in the 19th century. It became legal tender as part of Coinage Act of 1965. Cents have limited legal tender status up to 50 cents.
I believe gold coins were also demonetized in 1933 when they were removed from circulation.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
As far as I know, the Trade Dollar was the only coin ever demonetized and then inadvertently remonetized in the 1965 coinage act as Bill mentions.
Gold coins were illegal to hold over a certain dollar amount though, like $30 I think.
You allowed to set aside $100 in gold, which many people did not realize they could do.
Gold coins were not demonized, but it was illegal to hold them beyond the $100, or if they were rare and collectible. That was slippery. It was clarified in 1954 when the government said any thing dated 1933 and before was “rare” and collectible. The 1933 $20 gold owners ran into trouble because the government said none were issued officially.
Thanks Manifest,

As I said , and especially those early 1900's commems, I've not educated myself enough on those. They are very nice though.
I have over the last 15+ years picked up a few from the Mint when they were 'reasonably' priced, and have since sent them in last year.
Here's a few favorites in sequential order, with no wear...
.
.


.
I like worn commemoratives too.
Mr_Spud
I like them holed and a little worn.
Regarding large and worn commemoratives, you should take a look at the amazing Lafayette grading set assembled by @pocketpiececommems:
https://forums.collectors.com/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&target=http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistry/showcase.aspx?sc=1562
I carried this one around for years, still have it but it's no longer in my pocket on a daily basis.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
.
.
This thread could surely use some input from @pocketpiececommems
.
.
.
The following are a few of the ones I used to own.
.
.
.
These were one only slightly worn:
.
.
"To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Out of 43 problem free lowball Commemoratives I own, these are eight of my favorites.
peacockcoins
Funny how you remember coins.
I can't be sure that is the one but I remember bidding on a Missouri commem very similar.
I was outbid.
I like it.
Outstanding! Nice Texas and Oregon. That Hudson is worlds better (more worn and original) than mine.
That Missouri 2X4 looks familiar.
I bought this VF30 with CAC off eBay from DLRC in October, 2012 for $208. At the same time, I recall there was another nice Missouri in a higher grade with nice rich toning, but it was raw. I decided on this coin but considered buying both.
Some extras I found while looking for a couple of other coins:
And just for fun:
peacockcoins
The Iowa may turn out to be either AU58 or mint state. I've purchased 4-5 coins that I thought were AU+ that turned out to be MS63 and MS 64, teaching me a few tuition-free lessons on how to distinguish between AU+ and MS coins. When I botched the grading and purchased the wrong coin by mistake, I'd win! It's one of the peculiarities of being a circulated commemorative collector.
This was a $195 eBay grading "mistake." My best mistake in coin collecting.

PCGS MS63
Sorry for letting MS coins creep into this thread.
Great thread.
You find that coin you were looking for yet?
Not yet. Thank you for asking. Hopefully a $700 bounty will bring about a F15 or lower a Ft. Vancouver.
I really like how it brings out the relief in those art deco designs. I wonder if the sculptor had a vision for what they would look like circulated and made the design so it would be a plus to be worn and tarnished, it brings out the relief. Here

is a coin that someone painted, I think to get this effect, and it worked. Circ modern quarter but I had to keep it.
Current pocket pieces. Roanoke, and 2 2 slick 64 Kennedy’s