Home U.S. Coin Forum

1885-O Morgan DMPL?

I am wondering if anyone would hazard a guess from these photo's as to whether this is DMPL or not. Not sure about SEGS grading.

Comments

  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,190 ✭✭✭✭

    Obverse looks like it's probably DMPL, but I don't think the reverse has enough contrast for DMPL. It's tough to tell from your photos.

    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reverse does not do it for me for sure.

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BustHalfBrian said:
    Obverse looks like it's probably DMPL, but I don't think the reverse has enough contrast for DMPL. It's tough to tell from your photos.

    The degree of contrast isn’t a requirement for PL and DMPL/DPL dollars.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If I'm being honest it doesn't even look very PL from those photos.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,698 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No

    Coins & Currency
  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 9,792 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not seeing any if at all, reflectivity - so no

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,190 ✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @BustHalfBrian said:
    Obverse looks like it's probably DMPL, but I don't think the reverse has enough contrast for DMPL. It's tough to tell from your photos.

    The degree of contrast isn’t a requirement for PL and DMPL/DPL dollars.

    Thanks. I meant the depth of the mirrors.

    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am sure about SEGS

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,965 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would vote no.

  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I question when coins of that caliber are in non top TPG holders, I'm sure it's for a reason. Your best bet is to find a CAC stickered DMPL Morgan and compare the quality of the mirrors. We cannot guess from photos although generally a very dark field like in your first photo is promising, it cannot be relied upon.

  • I agree with you.

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    We need much better pics to give you reliable opinions, but honestly I wouldn't even rule out the possibility that the obverse of that coin is polished. The obv surfaces just look weird to me, some of the halos around the stars specifically. And the fact that it's not even close to the reverse surfaces.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1885-0 is a pretty common date to buy some nice DMPL Morgan's especially in ms64.
    The images don't help make the coin appear to be DMPL and SEGS has been know to be a little loose with their grading unfortunately.
    Good luck

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7

  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,074 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeakRarities said:
    We need much better pics to give you reliable opinions, but honestly I wouldn't even rule out the possibility that the obverse of that coin is polished. The obv surfaces just look weird to me, some of the halos around the stars specifically. And the fact that it's not even close to the reverse surfaces.

    Agreed. In my experience, that TPG has slabbed problem coins with non-problem grades, as well as typical 3rd world overgrading. Coins in those holders need to be evaluated as raw coins IMO.

  • It doesn't look remotely close to a DMPL or even PL. I wouldn't grade it a 65 either, I would go a 64 or 63.

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have some limited experience with SEGS when I was putting my 7070 together... of the SEGS-graded coins I've owned, most appear to have been at least one or two grades "generous"... and their holders were about the most difficult to crack coins out of! lol! Seriously though, to the OP... if you've not already purchased that coin... don't.

    Imaging PL and DMPL surfaces is really difficult. I tried... and gave up getting that TrueView "glamour shot" after a few weeks. It was a little disconcerting to have spent as much money as I did on camera equipment only to realize that there's actual skill involved! whodathunkit?! ;-)

    I wanted a DMPL Morgan for my Box of 20... I completely understand the draw. They're beautiful coins! Works of Art! I ultimately settled on a PCGS MS64DMPL with as clean a cheek as I could find... Looking back on this journey, I probably would have saved a bunch of time, effort, and MONEY, if I'd just bought the coin I wanted in the holder I wanted...

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file