@PickinndGrinnin said:
So I should be able to say MS62 and take @marcmoish guess? Or, is that only for proofs? Just a rule check?
I think the OP has to answer that. I would assume it was meant to be “MS” but not specified. If it were my coin/post, though, I would want the guess to say either “MS” or “PR” (“PF” too).
@PickinndGrinnin said:
So I should be able to say MS62 and take @marcmoish guess? Or, is that only for proofs? Just a rule check?
I would think to be correct in your answer, you need to specify MS, PF, DMPL, etc.You wouldn’t be correct if you said 67 without designating unc. or proof IMO.
@pcgsregistrycollector: scroll up about 1/2 dozen posts or so. This very issue was being discussed. By calling it 67, you’re not correct. It needs MS, PR or PF along with the number. That’s why @jfriedm56 moved on & posted another coin.
I still think the OP @Torey needs to make a ruling on this so it doesn’t come up again.
@Copperindian said: @pcgsregistrycollector: scroll up about 1/2 dozen posts or so. This very issue was being discussed. By calling it 67, you’re not correct. It needs MS, PR or PF along with the number. That’s why @jfriedm56 moved on & posted another coin.
I still think the OP @Torey needs to make a ruling on this so it doesn’t come up again.
I see. Thank you for the correction. I neglected to read the previous posts.
@PickinndGrinnin said:
This is a fun thread, thanks for having me.
In the mean time I want to share a coin from pocket change.
Any guess's on a grade?
I am at Au58+
This 1887 is borderline DMPL with the reverse luster keeping it at PL. Since Coinbert got the correct grade and everyone is seeing DMPL I will go ahead and reveal.
Comments
PF64
Well I guess I’ll call this one done since no one correctly graded this a PR-67.
So how about this one.
67+
MS64
62
So I should be able to say MS62 and take @marcmoish guess? Or, is that only for proofs? Just a rule check?
MS 63
I think the OP has to answer that. I would assume it was meant to be “MS” but not specified. If it were my coin/post, though, I would want the guess to say either “MS” or “PR” (“PF” too).
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
Nickelodeon
I would think to be correct in your answer, you need to specify MS, PF, DMPL, etc.You wouldn’t be correct if you said 67 without designating unc. or proof IMO.
Anyway, @Coinbert is correct. You’re up.
This is a fun thread, thanks for having me.
In the mean time I want to share a coin from pocket change.
Any guess's on a grade?
I am at Au58+
I said it was a 67. Look back at the previous comments. No worries though.
I'd say Au-58 or Au-55+. For the cents.
@pcgsregistrycollector: scroll up about 1/2 dozen posts or so. This very issue was being discussed. By calling it 67, you’re not correct. It needs MS, PR or PF along with the number. That’s why @jfriedm56 moved on & posted another coin.
I still think the OP @Torey needs to make a ruling on this so it doesn’t come up again.
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
Nickelodeon
I see. Thank you for the correction. I neglected to read the previous posts.
Agree and a plus is in order.
@Coinbert , you were correct on the $5. Indian. You’re up.
Sorry for the delay.
That's an interesting looking $20.
MS63
AU58
AU-53
AU50
AU 50. HighRelief you are up!
MS 65 DMPL
MS64 DMPL
MS65+ DMPL
This 1887 is borderline DMPL with the reverse luster keeping it at PL. Since Coinbert got the correct grade and everyone is seeing DMPL I will go ahead and reveal.
XF45
All I have to say is very nice. AU 50.
XF-40
30
PTC got it. Coin is under graded for sure.
I believe it is a Kellogg.
Hi Coinscratch, the $20 is a pioneer/private issue from Kellog. You can look it up on CoinFacts or in your Red book.
PTC is up.
Anyone else want to post a coin, since @PTC is AWOL?
How about a 1909-D Saint
MS63
AU-58
60
62
AU 55
You nailed it, Coinbert.
Sorry Guys, it was easter.
AU-55
MS-62
AU53