Will it CAC? Seated Dime edition PCGS MS66 1868-S **Update - Did not CAC.
Clackamas1
Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭✭✭
PCGS MS66 I have owned this since 2014 and in my notes I had it as having a Green bean so I never thought of sending it in. I guess I never did. It arrived yesterday. It was, before I owned it an NGC 67 and NGC still lists it in the POP.
Will it CAC? Seated Dime edition PCGS MS66 1868-S **Update - Did not CAC.
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
1
Comments
what year was that photo taken?
The photo was from 2014. Sorry for the quality it is a Heritage photo.
https://coins.ha.com/itm/seated-dimes/1868-s-10c-ms66-pcgs-fortin-101-pcgs-4648-/a/1214-98269.s?ic4=ListView-ShortDescription-071515
Don't really care if it bean's or not, it's a great coin. Congratulations.
Can't comment. What I see on my monitor shows a pic at least one stop overexposed.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
I'm not seeing the luster. Otherwise looks like a beautiful piece.
Nice coin but a C level MS-66 dime. JA is tough on these dimes.
yes it will bean
Mike
My Indians
Danco Set
No earlier than 1868
The photo does not have the Matthew Brady pedigree
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I cannot see why it would not. Beautiful coin.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
As a 66 it should, nice piece!
the ngc auction is in there too, but with worse pictures. for the few SD in that auction i looked at, the ones with color seem lusterless. there was one beaned that was a little less lifeless. then i thought of the old question: did they try it and it failed?
i'm going out on a limb and say yes
Good surface preservation, sharp strike, and lovely original toning.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
It did not CAC. It is a POP3/0 coin that was an NGC 67. One of the other 66's is a Eliasberg coin and not as nice. I guess JA thinks GEM and not 66.
I still think it's sweet.
not trying to insult, but i'm wondering what the poor auction images are hiding
No insult, it is clean as a whistle. The die state is mid to late so the fields are not flat but it has a better overall strike than other is MS. I want to get it truviewed so I may send it in but the holder is early 2000's upper 99 so I am hesitant to ruin that part.
ew-viewed (own it pcgs)?
send it to a forum prof photog and get it shot through the holder