Home U.S. Coin Forum

Possible 1922P Sandblasted, high relief peace dollar discovered

2»

Comments

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    By no means an expert on these issues, but with only a handful known, would I be wrong to assume only one pair of dies used? If so, wouldn't these die lines/marks be attributable to the die pair used and be needed? Just asking. Photo from CoinFacts.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • mon1ckmon1ck Posts: 27
    edited March 11, 2025 5:59PM

    I think this is the one finally, you don’t know how many different guys and different combinations. It took to find this, but I think this is finally the proof.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,540 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:

    I think this is the one finally, you don’t know how many different guys and different combinations. It took to find this, but I think this is finally the proof.

    Too many guys, too many combinations.

    It’s not special.

    Coin Photographer.

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Note the difference in the bust point in the pair the op just provided.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,745 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    As I’m sure you see from the title, I believe I found one of the few that are said to be in the wild. I was actually looking at another 22P because it looked oddly smooth and then I remembered that I had bought this one from a common bin and I bought it because it looked “my chemical romancy” and I had never seen one like that before, then I stored it and forgot about it until the other 22 that was previously mentioned. I examined MCR for like four hours that night, weighed it, and just examined every fine line because I had read that the high relief was the reverse of 21P and luckily I have one for comparison. The next day I took it to my trusted coin dealer to examine it, his initial thought was like everyone else’s, that it looked fake, but it read perfect on his machine and loupe exam and then he was very careful about what he said and told me the only way to know for sure is to get it graded, but before I left, I asked if he agreed with me and he confirmed he did.

    I’ll post some pictures and I would love to know your thoughts.

    Thanks guys!

    .

    This coin is a genuine 1922 Peace Silver Dollar. It happens to have a nice dark & light "circ-cam" (circulated cameo) look that some people like.

    Beyond that, it is not anything special. It was struck by the same dies as millions of other 1922 Peace Silver Dollars.
    It is not in any way a "high relief" strike. It is also lacking the 4th ray below "ONE" that the rare version would have.

    .

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good eye Dan, so much with the obverse, I never spent time on the reverse.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 8,102 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:

    I think this is the one finally, you don’t know how many different guys and different combinations. It took to find this, but I think this is finally the proof.

    They do not look remotely like the same coin. 0% chance it is a proof. So many differences that are very obvious.

  • I mean, not really if you take the time to look at the actual lines like front the dies themselves, the structures urea match up, so please I know the color of the coin does not appear to be the same. I’m asking you to go beneath surface level.

  • BANNEDBANNED Posts: 7,428 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    I mean, not really if you take the time to look at the actual lines like front the dies themselves, the structures urea match up, so please I know the color of the coin does not appear to be the same. I’m asking you to go beneath surface level.

  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 991 ✭✭✭✭✭

    When will this end

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    I mean, not really if you take the time to look at the actual lines like front the dies themselves, the structures urea match up, so please I know the color of the coin does not appear to be the same. I’m asking you to go beneath surface level.

    Come on, mate. No one likes to have their parade rained on but now you’re just being silly. Or a troll.

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • BANNEDBANNED Posts: 7,428 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RobertScotLover said:
    When will this end

  • Sandman70gtSandman70gt Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    I mean, not really if you take the time to look at the actual lines like front the dies themselves, the structures urea match up, so please I know the color of the coin does not appear to be the same. I’m asking you to go beneath surface level.

    If you don't believe anyone else's opinion, look up @dcarr. He knows the peace dollar like no one else. He knows more history of the design of this coin than anyone that's still alive. He has designed coins, made dies, struck coins, etc.

    Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    Don’t worry I’ll let you guys know the results of my low relief proof.

    What happened to sandblasted high relief?

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,540 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 11, 2025 7:40PM

    .

    Coin Photographer.

  • BANNEDBANNED Posts: 7,428 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This was a good effort, but not as much fun as the gold war nickel thread.

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,547 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not exactly sure what enjoyment there is in trying litigate the classification and grade outcome of this coin here… just send it to our host… post the result and be prepared to accept the verdict.

    In the meantime, we can look forward to the old war nickel thread followed by the cold war nickel thread.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,504 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinkat said:
    Not exactly sure what enjoyment there is in trying litigate the classification and grade outcome of this coin here… just send it to our host… post the result and be prepared to accept the verdict.

    In the meantime, we can look forward to the old war nickel thread followed by the cold war nickel thread.

    I agree totally. Sending the coin in for encapsulation will end all of this.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I know I am adding to it, but why is this any kind of issue after @dcarr noticed the lack of 4 rays below the E, which all high relief matte finish coins have, at least I have never read of another. End of discussion. When attributing a coin it takes many like features to prove it, but only one unalike to disprove it. Again, JMO
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,606 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manorcourtman said:

    @mon1ck said:

    I think this is the one finally, you don’t know how many different guys and different combinations. It took to find this, but I think this is finally the proof.

    They do not look remotely like the same coin. 0% chance it is a proof. So many differences that are very obvious.



    There is an unfortunate amount of non-productive back and forth here.

    Your coin is from a different reverse die than the low-relief proof you are comparing it to. In 1922 there were reverses with 3 distant mountains and reverses with two.


    Collector, occasional seller

  • KiwiNumiKiwiNumi Posts: 185 ✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:

    @Manorcourtman said:

    @mon1ck said:

    I think this is the one finally, you don’t know how many different guys and different combinations. It took to find this, but I think this is finally the proof.

    They do not look remotely like the same coin. 0% chance it is a proof. So many differences that are very obvious.



    There is an unfortunate amount of non-productive back and forth here.

    Your coin is from a different reverse die than the low-relief proof you are comparing it to. In 1922 there were reverses with 3 distant mountains and reverses with two.


    I was about to point that out as well. The thickness of the rim is completely off too, even accounting for wear. I've had some very stubborn moments in life but even I know better than to argue with @dcarr about something like this.

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,745 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:

    @Manorcourtman said:

    @mon1ck said:

    I think this is the one finally, you don’t know how many different guys and different combinations. It took to find this, but I think this is finally the proof.

    They do not look remotely like the same coin. 0% chance it is a proof. So many differences that are very obvious.



    There is an unfortunate amount of non-productive back and forth here.

    Your coin is from a different reverse die than the low-relief proof you are comparing it to. In 1922 there were reverses with 3 distant mountains and reverses with two.


    Yes, the 1922 low-relief proof is a 2-mountain type. Many 1922 non-proofs are also the 2-mountain. Many 1922 non-proofs are also 3-mountain, but no genuine proofs are 3-mountain.

    Also look at the sharpness of the strike on the tips of the rays. Non-proof commercial strikes generally have flat (not fully struck) tips on those rays. Proofs have sharp fully-struck rays. Compare these:

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,735 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very rarely do super rare coins surface by accident. Probably the only way that would happen would be if a major collectors coins by accident ended up getting foolishly dumped by surviving relatives.

  • Now that I have your guys attention, are these two peace dollars different?


  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    Don’t worry I’ll let you guys know the results of my low relief proof.

    CONGRATS on your awesome find. Did you happen to count the rays between the legs and tail feathers?

    Could you give us a weight and see if you can lift it with a magnet?

  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,901 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 12, 2025 6:26PM

    Show us a few closeups of the reeding please. (Edge on) .

  • Sure thing man.


  • Weighted it as well came out at 26.76g, magnet checked out too, sorry making dinner rn now too

  • Can I have your guys opinions now, please? :)

  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,901 ✭✭✭✭✭

    We think you should submit it to PCGS. Then we will all know.

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Since you asked, my opinion is that it is definitely not what you think it is.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • acsbacsb Posts: 159 ✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    Honestly, I’m just upset with everyone telling me it’s a fake because how can you fake 26.7 and 90/10?

    Ask the Canton mint.

  • CregCreg Posts: 686 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:

    @mon1ck said:
    this isn’t just some average schmuck that I had it verified by,

    Above average, eh?

    and it’s so funny how everyone
    doesn’t give a crap about anyone
    else’s coins, but their own,

    No fair, I like most coins that I see here more than my own.

    so yeah keep being miserable with
    your own coins/opinions because
    trust me, your coins are probably
    fake too.

    I am, but you ought not rub it in.


  • JBKJBK Posts: 15,946 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mon1ck said:
    Don’t worry I’ll let you guys know the results of my low relief proof.

    Amazing find. I had no idea they are worth so much. Do you have to use the walkthrough or rarities service level?

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=WYIUFsrNF2I

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dcarr said:

    @braddick said:
    I have one identical to the OP.
    How cool there are now two sand blasted 1922 Peace dollars now known.

    This is a known modern Chinese make. The same reverse die has been paired with various obverse dates including "1919". Note the smushed out "ON" of ONE.

    Also a die gouge below the hair above the "V" of TRVST.

    .

    Well, that is disappointing. I was going to treat my wife to a fabulous dinner at a local authentic Italian restaurant, The Olive Garden, but now it has to be hotdogs and Big Gulps from our local Seven/Eleven.
    :neutral:

    peacockcoins

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file