Guess the Grades - REVEALED
coastaljerseyguy
Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭✭✭
Pretty easy but lets see what folks say.
0
coastaljerseyguy
Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
1892-0 MS64
1882-0 MS65
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
Too high?
1892: hard to tell 65/65
1882-O: 64/67
I'll go 63 for both
Successful BST transactions- Bfjohnson, Collectorcoins, 1peter223, Shrub68, Byers, Greencopper, Coinlieutenant, Coinhunter4, SurfinxHI, ProfLiz
Lighting makes it a bit tough for both, especially the 82-O since it could wash out a lot of light chatter.
1892-O: 64
1882-O: 65
92-O - 63
82-O - 64
Around MS64.
92-O 65 (assuming chatter on cheek is as minor as it appears in photo)
82-O 65
Casual collector: Morgans & Peace Dollars & 20th Century Type Set. Successful BST transactions with Morgan13, CoinFinder, CoinHunter4, Bretsan.
Both 65.
92-O…64
82-O….65
The lighting can be too deceptive, I'm not going to try.
http://ProofCollection.Net
Thanks for all the guesses, assumed most would be higher then actual grade. Personally believe both coins under- graded by 1 by today's standards. Wasn't trying to be deceptive but get both coins in 1 pic which doesn't get direct light on either.
The 82-O does have some very slight scrape on cheek by nose probably from some bag friction or else I'd say it was easily a 65. Luster is a little subdued but that is common for the 82-O coins. The 92-O has a nice strike and luster. Always liked the ANACS rim toning, esp on the 82-O.
Use to have many of these older soap bar holders but sold most over the years, keeping these 2.
Wow those appear under graded indeed (from photos)!
Casual collector: Morgans & Peace Dollars & 20th Century Type Set. Successful BST transactions with Morgan13, CoinFinder, CoinHunter4, Bretsan.