Guess the Grades - REVEALED
coastaljerseyguy
Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
Pretty easy but lets see what folks say.
0
coastaljerseyguy
Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
1892-0 MS64
1882-0 MS65
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
Too high?
1892: hard to tell 65/65
1882-O: 64/67
I'll go 63 for both
Successful BST transactions- Bfjohnson, Collectorcoins, 1peter223, Shrub68, Byers, Greencopper, Coinlieutenant
Lighting makes it a bit tough for both, especially the 82-O since it could wash out a lot of light chatter.
1892-O: 64
1882-O: 65
92-O - 63
82-O - 64
Around MS64.
92-O 65 (assuming chatter on cheek is as minor as it appears in photo)
82-O 65
Casual collector, mostly Morgans & Peace Dollars. Successful BST transactions with Morgan13, CoinFinder, CoinHunter, Bretsan.
Both 65.
92-O…64
82-O….65
The lighting can be too deceptive, I'm not going to try.
http://ProofCollection.Net
Thanks for all the guesses, assumed most would be higher then actual grade. Personally believe both coins under- graded by 1 by today's standards. Wasn't trying to be deceptive but get both coins in 1 pic which doesn't get direct light on either.
The 82-O does have some very slight scrape on cheek by nose probably from some bag friction or else I'd say it was easily a 65. Luster is a little subdued but that is common for the 82-O coins. The 92-O has a nice strike and luster. Always liked the ANACS rim toning, esp on the 82-O.
Use to have many of these older soap bar holders but sold most over the years, keeping these 2.
Wow those appear under graded indeed (from photos)!
Casual collector, mostly Morgans & Peace Dollars. Successful BST transactions with Morgan13, CoinFinder, CoinHunter, Bretsan.